S Wilson1, J L Bair1, K M Thomas2, W G Iacono1. 1. Department of Psychology,University of Minnesota,75 E River Rd,Minneapolis,MN,USA. 2. Institute of Child Development,51 E River Rd,Minneapolis,MN,USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A number of studies reports reduced hippocampal volume in individuals who engage in problematic alcohol use. However, the magnitude of the difference in hippocampal volume between individuals with v. without problematic alcohol use has varied widely, and there have been null findings. Moreover, the studies comprise diverse alcohol use constructs and samples, including clinically significant alcohol use disorders and subclinical but problematic alcohol use (e.g. binge drinking), adults and adolescents, and males and females. METHODS: We conducted the first quantitative synthesis of the published empirical research on associations between problematic alcohol use and hippocampal volume. In total, 23 studies were identified and selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis; effects sizes were aggregated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Problematic alcohol use was associated with significantly smaller hippocampal volume (d = -0.53). Moderator analyses indicated that effects were stronger for clinically significant v. subclinical alcohol use and among adults relative to adolescents; effects did not differ among males and females. CONCLUSIONS: Problematic alcohol use is associated with reduced hippocampal volume. The moderate overall effect size suggests the need for larger samples than are typically included in studies of alcohol use and hippocampal volume. Because the existing literature is almost entirely cross-sectional, future research using causally informative study designs is needed to determine whether this association reflects premorbid risk for the development of problematic alcohol use and/or whether alcohol has a neurotoxic effect on the hippocampus.
BACKGROUND: A number of studies reports reduced hippocampal volume in individuals who engage in problematic alcohol use. However, the magnitude of the difference in hippocampal volume between individuals with v. without problematic alcohol use has varied widely, and there have been null findings. Moreover, the studies comprise diverse alcohol use constructs and samples, including clinically significant alcohol use disorders and subclinical but problematic alcohol use (e.g. binge drinking), adults and adolescents, and males and females. METHODS: We conducted the first quantitative synthesis of the published empirical research on associations between problematic alcohol use and hippocampal volume. In total, 23 studies were identified and selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis; effects sizes were aggregated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Problematic alcohol use was associated with significantly smaller hippocampal volume (d = -0.53). Moderator analyses indicated that effects were stronger for clinically significant v. subclinical alcohol use and among adults relative to adolescents; effects did not differ among males and females. CONCLUSIONS: Problematic alcohol use is associated with reduced hippocampal volume. The moderate overall effect size suggests the need for larger samples than are typically included in studies of alcohol use and hippocampal volume. Because the existing literature is almost entirely cross-sectional, future research using causally informative study designs is needed to determine whether this association reflects premorbid risk for the development of problematic alcohol use and/or whether alcohol has a neurotoxic effect on the hippocampus.
Authors: Donald W Zeigler; Claire C Wang; Richard A Yoast; Barry D Dickinson; Mary Anne McCaffree; Carolyn B Robinowitz; Melvyn L Sterling Journal: Prev Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Thomas P Beresford; David B Arciniegas; Julie Alfers; Lori Clapp; Brandon Martin; Yiping Du; Dengfeng Liu; Dinggang Shen; Christos Davatzikos Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Matthew J Smith; Lei Wang; Will Cronenwett; Morris B Goldman; Daniel Mamah; Deanna M Barch; John G Csernansky Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jasmine Turna; Sabrina K Syan; Benicio N Frey; Brian Rush; Mary Jean Costello; Mark Weiss; James MacKillop Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Dimitrios E Kouzoukas; Jennifer A Schreiber; Nuzhath F Tajuddin; Simon Kaja; Edward J Neafsey; Hee-Yong Kim; Michael A Collins Journal: Neurochem Int Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Simon Zhornitsky; Shefali Chaudhary; Thang M Le; Yu Chen; Sheng Zhang; Stéphane Potvin; Herta H Chao; Christopher H van Dyck; Chiang-Shan R Li Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2021-08-29 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Dayna M Hayes; Chelsea G Nickell; Kevin Y Chen; Justin A McClain; Megan M Heath; M Ayumi Deeny; Kimberly Nixon Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Leila M Soravia; Niklaus Denier; Franz Moggi; Matthias Grieder; Andrea Federspiel; Raphaela M Tschuemperlin; Hallie M Batschelet; Sabine Vollstädt-Klein; Roland Wiest; Maria Stein; Tobias Bracht Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2022-05 Impact factor: 4.093