Literature DB >> 2837444

Effect of dietary fiber on young adult genetically lean, obese and contemporary pigs: body weight, carcass measurements, organ weights and digesta content.

W G Pond1, H G Jung, V H Varel.   

Abstract

Twenty-one genetically lean, obese or contemporary barrows (6 mo old; seven of each genotype) were assigned to individual tether stalls and fed a control diet (low-fiber) or a diet containing 80% alfalfa meal (high-fiber) at 1.50% of initial body weight for 71 d (1.75% for d 1 to 4). Backfat thickness was recorded ultrasonically at 2-wk intervals, and body weight was recorded at the beginning and end of the 10-wk experiment. Pigs were slaughtered after a 24-h fast, and carcass weight, length and backfat thickness and cross-sectional area of the longissimus muscle were measured. Weights of cecum, heart, liver and kidney and of full and empty stomach and colon and empty small intestine were recorded. Volume and weight of colon and cecum contents were determined. Restriction of digestible energy reduced weight gain to zero or below in pigs fed alfalfa meal compared with 220 g daily in pigs fed the low-fiber diet. Restriction of energy reduced backfat in all three genotypes. Liver, kidney and empty segments of the gastrointestinal tract as a percentage of body weight were increased by high fiber. Obese pigs had smaller longissimus muscle area, more backfat and smaller liver, heart, empty stomach and colon than lean or contemporary pigs, but there were no diet X genotype interactions for any of these traits. Obese pigs consistently had smaller digesta volumes and dry matter weights than the other genotypes. The increased relative organ weights and the associated disproportionate contribution of these organs to body energy expenditure have important implications for effects on basal metabolic rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2837444     DOI: 10.2527/jas1988.663699x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

Review 1.  Physiological parameter values for physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in food-producing animals. Part I: Cattle and swine.

Authors:  Zhoumeng Lin; Miao Li; Yu-Shin Wang; Lisa A Tell; Ronald E Baynes; Jennifer L Davis; Thomas W Vickroy; Jim E Riviere
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 1.786

2.  Effects of withdrawing high-fiber ingredients before marketing on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and intestinal weights.

Authors:  Kyle F Coble; Joel M DeRouchey; Mike D Tokach; Steve S Dritz; Robert D Goodband; Jason C Woodworth
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effect of lower-energy, higher-fiber diets on pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake when fed higher-energy, lower-fiber diets.

Authors:  E D Mauch; J M Young; N V L Serão; W L Hsu; J F Patience; B J Kerr; T E Weber; N K Gabler; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  The use of an alternative feed additive, containing benzoic acid, thymol, eugenol, and piperine, improved growth performance, nutrient and energy digestibility, and gut health in weaned piglets.

Authors:  Cláudio D Silva Júnior; Cláudia C S Martins; Francine T F Dias; Natália Y Sitanaka; Letícia B Ferracioli; José E Moraes; Carla C Pizzolante; Fábio E L Budiño; Rafaela Pereira; Polyana Tizioto; Vinicius R C Paula; Luiz L Coutinho; Urbano S Ruiz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effect of Dietary Inulin Supplementation on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, and Meat Quality in Growing-Finishing Pigs.

Authors:  Weikang Wang; Daiwen Chen; Bing Yu; Zhiqing Huang; Yuheng Luo; Ping Zheng; Xiangbin Mao; Jie Yu; Junqiu Luo; Jun He
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Nutritional approaches to slow late finishing pig growth: implications on carcass composition and pork quality.

Authors:  Emma T Helm; Jason W Ross; John F Patience; Steven M Lonergan; Elisabeth Huff-Lonergan; Laura L Greiner; Leah M Reever; Chad W Hastad; Emily K Arkfeld; Nicholas K Gabler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Impact of a High-Fat or High-Fiber Diet on Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolic Markers in a Pig Model.

Authors:  Sonja N Heinritz; Eva Weiss; Meike Eklund; Tobias Aumiller; Charlotte M E Heyer; Sabine Messner; Andreas Rings; Sandrine Louis; Stephan C Bischoff; Rainer Mosenthin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.