Literature DB >> 28374052

Stress fractures of the foot and ankle, part 1: biomechanics of bone and principles of imaging and treatment.

Jacob C Mandell1, Bharti Khurana2, Stacy E Smith3.   

Abstract

A stress fracture is a focal failure of bone induced by the summation of repetitive forces, which overwhelms the normal bone remodeling cycle. This review, the first of two parts, discusses the general principles of stress fractures of the foot and ankle. This includes bone structure, biomechanics of stress applied to bone, bone remodeling, risk factors for stress fracture, and general principles of imaging and treatment of stress fractures. Cortical bone and trabecular bone have a contrasting macrostructure, which leads to differing resistances to externally applied forces. The variable and often confusing imaging appearance of stress fractures of the foot and ankle can largely be attributed to the different imaging appearance of bony remodeling of trabecular and cortical bone. Risk factors for stress fracture can be divided into intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Stress fractures subject to compressive forces are considered low-risk and are treated with activity modification and correction of any modifiable risk factors. Stress fractures subject to tensile forces and/or located in regions of decreased vascularity are considered high risk, with additional treatment options including restricted weight-bearing or surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone remodeling; Bone structure; Foot and ankle; Stress fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28374052     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2640-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  48 in total

Review 1.  Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  C H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Bone strength estimates relative to vertical ground reaction force discriminates women runners with stress fracture history.

Authors:  Kristin L Popp; William McDermott; Julie M Hughes; Stephanie A Baxter; Steven D Stovitz; Moira A Petit
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries.

Authors:  J E Taunton; M B Ryan; D B Clement; D C McKenzie; D R Lloyd-Smith; B D Zumbo
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Stress fractures. A classification of the earliest radiographic signs.

Authors:  C J Savoca
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Stress fractures in runners.

Authors:  Mark A Harrast; Daniel Colonno
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 6.  Stress fractures: current concepts.

Authors:  R H Daffner; H Pavlov
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Stress fractures of the calcaneus in women marine recruits.

Authors:  C N Hopson; D R Perry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  An analysis of the biomechanical mechanism of tibial stress fractures among Israeli infantry recruits. A prospective study.

Authors:  C Milgrom; M Giladi; A Simkin; N Rand; R Kedem; H Kashtan; M Stein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Experimental stress fractures of the tibia. Biological and mechanical aetiology in rabbits.

Authors:  D B Burr; C Milgrom; R D Boyd; W L Higgins; G Robin; E L Radin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-05

10.  Stress fractures in athletes. A study of 320 cases.

Authors:  G O Matheson; D B Clement; D C McKenzie; J E Taunton; D R Lloyd-Smith; J G MacIntyre
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  10 in total

1.  Tibial bone stress injury: diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement of an abbreviated 5-min magnetic resonance protocol.

Authors:  Jessica R Mann; Ged G Wieschhoff; Ryan Tai; William C Wrobel; Nehal Shah; Jacob C Mandell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Regulatory role of microRNA-185 in the recovery process after ankle fracture.

Authors:  Deping Sun; Juntao Liu; Qingpeng Shi; Haibo Mu; Dongsheng Zhou
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Ultrasound and bone: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Stefano Bianchi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-05-17

4.  The Application of Biomechanics Combined with Human Body Structure in Volleyball Technical Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Kai Zhao
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 5.  Bone Stress Injuries in Runners: a Review for Raising Interest in Stress Fractures in Korea.

Authors:  Sun Hong Song; Jung Hoi Koo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 6.  Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lin Lu; Jiayao Zhang; Yi Xie; Fei Gao; Song Xu; Xinghuo Wu; Zhewei Ye
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  Overuse-Related Injuries of the Musculoskeletal System: Systematic Review and Quantitative Synthesis of Injuries, Locations, Risk Factors and Assessment Techniques.

Authors:  Amaranta Orejel Bustos; Valeria Belluscio; Valentina Camomilla; Leandro Lucangeli; Francesco Rizzo; Tommaso Sciarra; Francesco Martelli; Claudia Giacomozzi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Forefoot Injuries in Athletes: Integration of the Movement System.

Authors:  Lindsay A Carroll; Stephen Paulseth; RobRoy L Martin
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-01-01

9.  [Stress fracture of athletes as a cause of groin pain].

Authors:  K Bath; I Steinhagen
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 10.  [Which typical foot fractures should the radiologist know?]

Authors:  G Bratke; V Neuhaus; K Slebocki; S Haneder; R Rau
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 0.635

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.