| Literature DB >> 28373975 |
Miao Liu1, Lingyao Du1, Zhiliang He1, Libo Yan1, Ying Shi1, Jin Shang1, Hong Tang1.
Abstract
Aim. ERp57 is involved in virus induced endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) and plays an important role in tumorigenesis. This study aimed to find whether HBV infection altered ERp57 expression and whether ERp57 regulation was involved in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC) genesis. Materials and Methods. HBV-HCC tissues, chronic hepatitis B (CHB) liver tissues, and normal liver tissues were acquired. ERp57 expressions in these tissues were detected through immunohistochemistry (IHC). And ERp57 expression in liver cell line L02, HBV replicative liver cell line L02-pHBV4.1, and HCC cell lines were detected through western blot for verification. Then medical data on patients providing HCC tissues were collected and analyzed along with ERp57 expression. Results. Higher ERp57 expression was found in HCC and CHB tissues (p < 0.001). And HCC cell lines and L02-pHBV4.1 presented higher ERp57 expression as well. In patients, ERp57 expression showed significant differences between death and survival groups (p = 0.037). And cumulative survival in patients with higher ERp57 (score ⩾ 8.75) is significantly lower (p = 0.009). Conclusion. Our study found increased expression of ERp57 in HBV-HCC. Such altered expression could be related to HBV infection and high ERp57 expression may lead to poor prognosis of HBV-HCC patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28373975 PMCID: PMC5360968 DOI: 10.1155/2017/1252647
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Detailed criteria of Axiotis Score.
| Percentage score | Intensity score | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0~10% positive cells | 0 | No color |
| 1 | 11~25% positive cells | 1 | Yellow |
| 2 | 26~50% positive cells | 2 | Brown |
| 3 | 51~75% positive cells | 3 | Tan |
| 4 | 76~100% positive cells | ||
The sum of the two scores equaled the sum score. And five different sum scores from random view under 400x magnification were acquired for a mean sum score. The assessments were implemented by two pathologists unaware of the tissue section arrangement. If there were differences in their opinions, extra mean would be calculated with the two mean sums for final score.
Sequences of primers used in RT-PCR.
| Primer name | Sequence |
|---|---|
| ERp57 forward primer | 5′-CTCCTCGCCTCCGCCTCAGA-3′ |
| ERP57 reverse primer | 5′-AGCCCACCACCGAGGCATCT-3′ |
| GAPDH forward primer | 5′-ACCCACTCCTCCACCTTTGA-3′ |
| GAPDH reverse primer | 5′-CTGTTGCTGTAGCCAAATTCGT-3′ |
Figure 1ERp57 expression in HCC liver tissues. (a) Statistical diagram of ERp57 expression score in normal livers and HCC tissues. (b) Representative images of IHC stained ERp57 in normal livers and HCC tissues.
Figure 2ERp57 expression variation in CHB liver tissues. (a) Statistical diagram of ERp57 expression score in normal livers and CHB liver tissues. (b) Representative images of IHC stained ERp57 in normal livers and CHB liver tissues.
Figure 3ERp57 expression in normal liver cell line and HCC cell lines. (a) ERp57 expression detected by western blot in different cell lines with GAPDH as internal reference. (b) Statistical diagram of Quantity One captured western blot detected ERp57 expression data. The ERp57/GAPDH ratios of other cell lines were transformed into relative ratio according to the ERp57/GAPDH ratio of L02 cells as “1.”
Figure 4Transcription and expression level of ERp57 in normal liver cell line L02 and HBV replicative liver cell line L02-pHBV4.1. (a) RT-PCR detected relative ERp57 mRNA level in L02 and L02-pHBV4.1 with GAPDH as internal reference. (b) ERp57 expression detected by western blot in L02 and L02-pHBV4.1 with GAPDH as internal reference. (c) Statistical diagram of Quantity One captured western blot detected ERp57 expression data. The ERp57/GAPDH ratios of HBV infected cell line, L02-pHBV4.1, was transformed into relative ratio according to the ERp57/GAPDH ratio of L02 cells as “1.”
Univariate analysis of factors related to ERp57 expression in HCC tissue sections.
| Factors | Frequency/media (mean) ± IQR(SD) | Mann–Whitney test ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 8/58 | −0.079 | 0.937 |
| Age (year) | 50.23 ± 11.60 | −0.169 | 0.176 |
| AFP (ng/ml) | 198.3 ± 1690.84 | 0.213 | 0.091 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 47 ± 38.5 | −0.105 | 0.408 |
| HBeAg (positive/negative) | 14/52 | −1.044 | 0.297 |
| HBVDNA (IU/mL) | 500 ± 6167.5 | 0.089 | 0.480 |
| Ishak Score | 5 ± 2 | −0.210 | 0.090 |
| Tumor Size (<5 cm/ | 20/46 | −1.487 | 0.137 |
| Differentiated degree (poor/moderate/high) | 10/50/6 | −1.347 | 0.178 |
| Capsule invasion (positive/negative) | 39/27 | −1.742 | 0.081 |
| Margin involvement (positive/negative) | 3/63 | −0.893 | 0.372 |
| Tumor thrombus (positive/negative) | 21/45 | −2.3 | 0.021 |
| Metastasis (positive/negative ) | 7/59 | −1.063 | 0.288 |
| Prognosis (death/survival/lost to follow-up) | 19/28/19 | −2.083 | 0.037 |
Univariate analysis of factors related to prognosis in patients within follow-up (N = 47).
| Factors | Death | Survival | Mann–Whitney test ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 17/2 | 25/3 | −0.000 | 1.000 |
| Age (year) | 46 ± 25 | 50.5 ± 13.75 | −0.651 | 0.515 |
| AFP (ng/ml) | 528.8 ± 3064.72 | 93.62 ± 1153.70 | −0.902 | 0.367 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 37 ± 23.5 | 46 ± 28 | −1.206 | 0.228 |
| HBeAg (positive/negative) | 2/17 | 8/20 | 2.201 | 0.168 |
| HBVDNA (IU/mL) | 500 ± 0 | 500 ± 10775 | −1.192 | 0.233 |
| Ishak Score | 4 ± 2 | 5 ± 2 | −0.906 | 0.365 |
| Tumor Size (<5 cm/ | 5/14 | 11/17 | 0.848 | 0.357 |
| Differentiated degree (poor/moderate/high) | 3/16/0 | 3/20/5 | 3.863 | 0.145 |
| Capsule invasion (positive/negative) | 9/10 | 15/13 | 0.174 | 0.676 |
| Margin involvement (positive/negative) | 2/17 | 1/27 | 0.916 | 0.338 |
| Tumor thrombus (positive/negative) | 10/9 | 3/25 | 9.940 | 0.003 |
| Metastasis (positive/negative) | 3/16 | 1/27 | 2.170 | 0.289 |
| Axiotis score of ERp57 expression in tissue sections | 10.6 ± 4.15 | 8.025 ± 3.4 | −2.083 | 0.037 |
Figure 5Cumulative Survival in two groups divided by ERp57 expression. Two groups were divided by cut-off value (Axiotis score = 8.75). Blue curve represented the group with ERp57 score < 8.75, while the green curve represented the group with ERp57 score ⩾ 8.75. According to Mantel-Cox test, cumulative survival of these two groups showed significant difference (p = 0.009).