| Literature DB >> 28373828 |
Stéfano M Cirigliano1,2, María I Díaz Bessone1,2, Damián E Berardi1, Carolina Flumian1, Elisa D Bal de Kier Joffé1,2, Silvio E Perea3, Hernán G Farina2,4, Laura B Todaro1,2, Alejandro J Urtreger1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Up to 80% of cancer patients are classified as non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cisplatin remains as the gold standard chemotherapy treatment, despite its limited efficacy due to both intrinsic and acquired resistance. The CK2 is a Ser/Thr kinase overexpressed in various types of cancer, including lung cancer. CIGB-300 is an antitumor peptide with a novel mechanism of action, since it binds to CK2 substrates thus preventing the enzyme activity. The aim of this work was to analyze the effects of CIGB-300 treatment targeting CK2-dependent signaling pathways in NSCLC cell lines and whether it may help improve current chemotherapy treatment.Entities:
Keywords: CIGB-300; CK2; NF-κB; NSCLC
Year: 2017 PMID: 28373828 PMCID: PMC5374619 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-017-0413-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Cell Int ISSN: 1475-2867 Impact factor: 5.722
Fig. 1Anti-proliferative effect of CIGB-300 on 2D and 3D cultures. a IC50 determination for H125 monolayer cultures. Each value represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. b The IC50 dose obtained in H125 cells growing in monolayer was tested on multicelullar tumor spheroids. Each value represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *p < 0.001 vs. H125 spheroids without treatment, 2-way ANOVA test (left side). Representative images for three different experiments were taken after 5 days of treatment, scale bar 100 μM (right side). c Internalization studies on H125 spheroids were performed treating cells from 5 to 60 min with a biotin-labeled CIGB-300 and visualized by immunocytochemistry. Representative images of three different experiments. Zoom 400×, scale bar 100 μm (top). Immunoreactive staining was quantified as a function of the distance to the spheroid center for each condition (bottom)
Fig. 2Effect of CIGB-300 on CK2-dependent signaling pathways. a Nuclear, cytoplasmic or whole cell extracts prepared from H125 cells treated with low-lethal doses of CIGB-300 in combination or not with an activating stimulus, were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted with p65/RelA and P-p65 (Ser529) antibodies (50 μg protein/lane). ACTIN expression level was used as protein loading control. For the determination of p65 levels PMA was used as the activating stimulus, while TNFα was used for P-p65 determinations. Results are representative of three independent experiments. b Whole cell extracts prepared from H125 cells treated with CIGB-300, were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted with CYCLIN D1, CYCLIN E and BAX antibodies (50 μg protein/lane). ACTIN expression level was used as protein loading control. c H125 cells were transiently co-transfected with pNF-κB-RE-luc and pRL-TK-luc vectors, treated with low-lethal doses of CIGB-300 in combination or not with PMA and luciferase activity was determined. Data were normalized to the constitutive Renilla luciferase activity and expressed as the mean ± SD. **p < 0.01 vs. PMA treated cells and *p < 0.05 PMA + CIGB-300 treated cells vs. PMA treated cells (one-way ANOVA test). Results are representative of three independent experiments. d H125 cells were treated with low-lethal doses of CIGB-300 in combination or not with PMA. Cellular distribution of p65 was visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy. Figure shows representative images of three independent experiments, scale bar 50 μm. White arrows indicate highly positive nucleus. Representative insets of cells treated with PMA in combination or not with CIGB-300 are shown, scale bar 5 μm (left side). Relative p65 nuclear intensity was measured and represented as a percentage of control cells (light gray bars). **p < 0.01 vs. CIGB-300 treated cells (one-way ANOVA test). The percentage of those cells with highly positive nucleus (white arrows) was also measured (dark gray bars). **p < 0.01 vs. PMA treated cells and *p < 0.05 PMA + CIGB-300 treated cells vs. PMA treated cells (one-way ANOVA test) (right side). e H125 cells were incubated with CM containing the wnt3a factor and then treated with low-lethal doses of CIGB-300 or TBB. Cytoplasmic protein content was separated by SDS-PAGE 10% and the membrane was blotted with anti β-CATENIN antibody (50 μg protein/lane). ACTIN expression level was used as protein loading control. Results are representative of three independent experiments
Fig. 3NF-κB signaling pathway status after cisplatin treatment. a H125 cells were treated with low-lethal doses CIGB-300 for 45 min in the presence or not of cisplatin. Nuclear extracts were prepared, resolved in 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted with anti p65/RelA antibodies (50 μg protein/lane). ACTIN expression level was used as protein loading control. Results are representative of three independent experiments. b A549 and A549-cispR cultures were treated with cisplatin and cell number was assessed 72 h later. Viability values were compared to those obtained in both cell lines without treatment, which were set as 100%. Data expressed as the mean ± SE are representative of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs. the parental cell line (Student’s t test). c Whole cell lysates prepared from A549and A549-cispR cells were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted with anti p65/RelA antibodies (50 μg protein/lane). ACTIN expression level was used as protein loading control. Results are representative of three independent experiments. d Nuclear extracts prepared from A549and A549-cispR cells treated with cisplatin were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted with anti P65/RelA antibodies (50 μg protein/lane). ACTIN expression level was used as protein loading control. Results are representative of three independent experiments
Fig. 4Evaluation of Cisplatin and CIGB-300 combined treatment in a chemo-resistant setting. a A549 and A549-cispR cells were treated with low-lethal doses of CIGB-300 (150 μM) and/or Cisplatin and cell number was assessed 72 h later. Viability values were compared to those obtained in both cell lines without treatment, which were set as 100%. Data represent the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs. the parental cell line (one-way ANOVA test). b Chou and Talalay combination index (CI) plot for CIGB-300 and Cisplatin values of three independent experiments. c A549 and A549-cispR cells were treated with a high dose of CIGB-300 (300 μM) during 72 h and cell viability was evaluated using the MTS assay. Viability values were compared to those obtained in both cell lines without treatment, which were set as 100%. Data represent the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. *p < 0.01 vs. the parental cell line (Student’s t test). d A549 and A549-cispR cells were treated with a high dose of CIGB-300 (300 μM) during 18 h and apoptosis induction was visualized by an acridine orange/ethidium bromide double staining assay. Figure shows representative images of three independent experiments (left side). The number of dead cells was quantified and expressed as a percentage of the total cell number for each cell line (right side). Data represent the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs. the parental cell line (Student’s t test). e A549 and A549-cispR cells were treated with 150 μM of CIGB-300 for 90 min in the presence or not of cisplatin. PMA was used as control. Nuclear extracts were prepared, resolved in 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted with anti p65/RelA antibodies (50 μg protein/lane). ACTIN expression level was used as protein loading control. Results are representative of three independent experiments. f Whole cell extracts prepared from A549 and A549-cispR cells treated with 300 μM of CIGB-300, were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted with BAX and c-MYC antibodies (50 μg protein/lane). ACTIN expression level was used as protein loading control
Fig. 5Association between NF-κB modulation and proteasome activity. a H125 cells pretreated with a non-cytotoxic dose of Bortezomib were exposed to CIGB-300. Nuclear extracts were prepared, resolved in 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted with anti p65/RelA antibodies (50 μg protein/lane). ACTIN expression level was used as protein loading control. Results are representative of three independent experiments. b Proteasome activity determination following the Proteasome-Glo™ cell-based assay for H125 treated with CIGB-300 or Bortezomib (Bz) as positive control. Data was expressed as the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs. Bz treated cells and ***p < 0.001 vs. control treated cells (one-way ANOVA test). c Cellular distribution of CIGB-300 (green, FITC) and α7/C8 protein (red, Alexa647) was visualized by confocal microscopy (top). Figure shows representative images of three independent experiments. Single cell analysis of Pearson and Manders coefficients were performed, as well as a representative colocalization map and a dot plot for both probes (bottom). Coefficient values are expressed as the mean ± SE of three independent experiments