Shuna Yao1, Junbo Li2, Zhihua Yao1, Yuanlin Xu1, Junfeng Chu1, Jiuyang Zhang1, Shuiling Jin2, Yangyang Huang1, Jianbo Zhang3, Jie Ma3, Yan Zhao1, Shujun Yang1, Yanyan Liu1. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Henan Cancer Hospital & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450008, China. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450014, China. 3. Department of Pathology, Henan Cancer Hospital & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450008, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Extranodal involvement represents a peculiar presentation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Previous studies have suggested that older patients are more prone to extranodal involvement. This study retrospectively addressed the distribution, prognostic value and treatment options of extranodal involvement in young patients with DLBCL. METHODS: A total of 329 patients were enrolled according to the inclusion requirements. The effects of gender, extranodal involvement, age-adjusted international prognostic index (aaIPI), rituximab infusion and radiotherapy on patient outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Among these patients, 59% presented extranodal involvement in 16 anatomic sites. More than one instance was linked to many poorer clinical characteristics and poorer survival compared with either nodal disease or one instance. In patients with one extranodal lesion, multivariate analysis revealed that the site of extranodal involvement, but not the aaIPI or rituximab infusion, was independently related to the outcome, and radiotherapy had a negative influence on survival. CONCLUSIONS: Extranodal involvement is common in younger patients and exhibits a ubiquitous distribution. The site of extranodal involvement is of strong prognostic significance. Radiotherapy for extranodal lesions does not improve patient outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Extranodal involvement represents a peculiar presentation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Previous studies have suggested that older patients are more prone to extranodal involvement. This study retrospectively addressed the distribution, prognostic value and treatment options of extranodal involvement in young patients with DLBCL. METHODS: A total of 329 patients were enrolled according to the inclusion requirements. The effects of gender, extranodal involvement, age-adjusted international prognostic index (aaIPI), rituximab infusion and radiotherapy on patient outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Among these patients, 59% presented extranodal involvement in 16 anatomic sites. More than one instance was linked to many poorer clinical characteristics and poorer survival compared with either nodal disease or one instance. In patients with one extranodal lesion, multivariate analysis revealed that the site of extranodal involvement, but not the aaIPI or rituximab infusion, was independently related to the outcome, and radiotherapy had a negative influence on survival. CONCLUSIONS: Extranodal involvement is common in younger patients and exhibits a ubiquitous distribution. The site of extranodal involvement is of strong prognostic significance. Radiotherapy for extranodal lesions does not improve patient outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; extranodal involvement; prognosis
Authors: B D Cheson; S J Horning; B Coiffier; M A Shipp; R I Fisher; J M Connors; T A Lister; J Vose; A Grillo-López; A Hagenbeek; F Cabanillas; D Klippensten; W Hiddemann; R Castellino; N L Harris; J O Armitage; W Carter; R Hoppe; G P Canellos Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: T A Lister; D Crowther; S B Sutcliffe; E Glatstein; G P Canellos; R C Young; S A Rosenberg; C A Coltman; M Tubiana Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1989-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: H Tilly; U Vitolo; J Walewski; M Gomes da Silva; O Shpilberg; M André; M Pfreundschuh; M Dreyling Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Bruce D Cheson; Beate Pfistner; Malik E Juweid; Randy D Gascoyne; Lena Specht; Sandra J Horning; Bertrand Coiffier; Richard I Fisher; Anton Hagenbeek; Emanuele Zucca; Steven T Rosen; Sigrid Stroobants; T Andrew Lister; Richard T Hoppe; Martin Dreyling; Kensei Tobinai; Julie M Vose; Joseph M Connors; Massimo Federico; Volker Diehl Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-01-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Wyndham H Wilson; Ryan M Young; Roland Schmitz; Yandan Yang; Stefania Pittaluga; George Wright; Chih-Jian Lih; P Mickey Williams; Arthur L Shaffer; John Gerecitano; Sven de Vos; Andre Goy; Vaishalee P Kenkre; Paul M Barr; Kristie A Blum; Andrei Shustov; Ranjana Advani; Nathan H Fowler; Julie M Vose; Rebecca L Elstrom; Thomas M Habermann; Jacqueline C Barrientos; Jesse McGreivy; Maria Fardis; Betty Y Chang; Fong Clow; Brian Munneke; Davina Moussa; Darrin M Beaupre; Louis M Staudt Journal: Nat Med Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: E Zucca; A Conconi; T I Mughal; A H Sarris; J F Seymour; U Vitolo; R Klasa; M Ozsahin; G M Mead; M A Gianni; S Cortelazzo; A J M Ferreri; A Ambrosetti; M Martelli; C Thiéblemont; H Gomez Moreno; G Pinotti; G Martinelli; R Mozzana; S Grisanti; M Provencio; M Balzarotti; F Laveder; G Oltean; V Callea; P Roy; F Cavalli; M K Gospodarowicz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544