Literature DB >> 28373536

Accelerated body size evolution during cold climatic periods in the Cenozoic.

Julien Clavel1, Hélène Morlon2.   

Abstract

How ecological and morphological diversity accumulates over geological time is much debated. Adaptive radiation theory has been successful in testing the effects of biotic interactions on the rapid divergence of phenotypes within a clade, but this theory ignores abiotic effects. The role of abiotic drivers on the tempo of phenotypic evolution has been tested only in a few lineages or small clades from the fossil record. Here, we develop a phylogenetic comparative framework for testing if and how clade-wide rates of phenotypic evolution vary with abiotic drivers. We apply this approach to comprehensive bird and mammal phylogenies, body size data for 9,465 extant species, and global average temperature trends over the Cenozoic. Across birds and mammals, we find that the rate of body size evolution is primarily driven by past climate. Unexpectedly, evolutionary rates are inferred to be higher during periods of cold rather than warm climates in most groups, suggesting that temperature influences evolutionary rates by modifying selective pressures rather than through its effect on energy availability and metabolism. The effect of climate on the rate of body size evolution seems to be a general feature of endotherm evolution, regardless of wide differences in species' ecology and evolutionary history. These results suggest that climatic changes played a major role in shaping species' evolution in the past and could also play a major role in shaping their evolution in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate; endotherms; evolutionary rates; macroevolution; phylogenetics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28373536      PMCID: PMC5402425          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1606868114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  47 in total

Review 1.  Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present.

Authors:  J Zachos; M Pagani; L Sloan; E Thomas; K Billups
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.

Authors:  Simon P Blomberg; Theodore Garland; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Testing the relationship between morphological and molecular rates of change along phylogenies.

Authors:  Lindell Bromham; Megan Woolfit; Michael S Y Lee; Andrew Rambaut
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  The effects of topological inaccuracy in evolutionary trees on the phylogenetic comparative method of independent contrasts.

Authors:  Matthew R E Symonds
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  The rate of DNA evolution: effects of body size and temperature on the molecular clock.

Authors:  James F Gillooly; Andrew P Allen; Geoffrey B West; James H Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cenozoic continental climatic evolution of Central Europe.

Authors:  Volker Mosbrugger; Torsten Utescher; David L Dilcher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood.

Authors:  Brian C O'Meara; Cécile Ané; Michael J Sanderson; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  The road from Santa Rosalia: a faster tempo of evolution in tropical climates.

Authors:  Shane Wright; Jeannette Keeling; Len Gillman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Neutral theory, phylogenies, and the relationship between phenotypic change and evolutionary rates.

Authors:  T Jonathan Davies; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language.

Authors:  Emmanuel Paradis; Julien Claude; Korbinian Strimmer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  17 in total

1.  Miocene biome turnover drove conservative body size evolution across Australian vertebrates.

Authors:  Ian G Brennan; J Scott Keogh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Phylogenomic and Macroevolutionary Evidence for an Explosive Radiation of a Plant Genus in the Miocene.

Authors:  Hanghui Kong; Fabien L Condamine; Lihua Yang; A J Harris; Chao Feng; Fang Wen; Ming Kang
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 9.160

3.  Macroevolutionary dynamics of climatic niche space.

Authors:  Ignacio Quintero; Marc A Suchard; Walter Jetz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  The Dynamics, Causes, and Impacts of Mammalian Evolutionary Rates Revealed by the Analyses of Capybara Draft Genome Sequences.

Authors:  Isaac Adeyemi Babarinde; Naruya Saitou
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Pulsed evolution shaped modern vertebrate body sizes.

Authors:  Michael J Landis; Joshua G Schraiber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Independent evolution of baleen whale gigantism linked to Plio-Pleistocene ocean dynamics.

Authors:  Graham J Slater; Jeremy A Goldbogen; Nicholas D Pyenson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Linking evolutionary mode to palaeoclimate change reveals rapid radiations of staphylinoid beetles in low-energy conditions.

Authors:  Liang Lü; Chen-Yang Cai; Xi Zhang; Alfred F Newton; Margaret K Thayer; Hong-Zhang Zhou
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Rates of niche and phenotype evolution lag behind diversification in a temperate radiation.

Authors:  Ryan A Folk; Rebecca L Stubbs; Mark E Mort; Nico Cellinese; Julie M Allen; Pamela S Soltis; Douglas E Soltis; Robert P Guralnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Contrasting impacts of competition on ecological and social trait evolution in songbirds.

Authors:  Jonathan P Drury; Joseph A Tobias; Kevin J Burns; Nicholas A Mason; Allison J Shultz; Hélène Morlon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 10.  Inferring Evolutionary Process From Neuroanatomical Data.

Authors:  Eric Lewitus
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.856

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.