Literature DB >> 28373140

Acute quadriceps tendon rupture repaired by suture anchors: Outcomes at 7 years' follow-up in 25 cases.

P Brossard1, G Le Roux1, B Vasse2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acute quadriceps tendon rupture is rare. The gold-standard repair technique is transosseous patellar suture. Biomechanical studies have validated the use of anchors as an alternative. The present study sought to report long-term clinical and radiological results in a series of acute quadriceps tendon rupture repaired with anchors. The study hypothesis was that results are comparable to those of the gold-standard technique.
METHODS: A retrospective continuous study included 25 knees with acute quadriceps tendon rupture, operated on by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2013: 22 patients; 17 males, 5 females; mean age, 64 years (range: 52-87 years). Modified Bunnell suture was performed, using either 2 anchors (19 knees) or 3 anchors (6 knees). Anchors were positioned under 20° flexion. The factors studied were: active range of motion, muscle strength, patient satisfaction, Lysholm score, return to work, and the radiological behavior of the anchors.
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 7 years (range: 3-9 years), all but 1 patient had 0° active extension. Mean active flexion was 128° (range: 110-150°), and mean muscle strength was 4.9/5. Mean Lysholm score was 92. Subjective results proved satisfactory or very satisfactory in 23 cases. Working patients returned to work at a mean 4.2 months. There were no cases of anchor migration or of re-rupture. One poorly tolerated anchor was ablated at 2 years, without functional impact.
CONCLUSION: Outcomes with anchors were comparable to those of the gold-standard technique. Anchors allow immediate rehabilitation, without risk of anchor migration. The technique provided satisfactory functional recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective cohort study.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anchor; Outcomes; Quadriceps tendon; Radiographic evaluation; Rupture

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28373140     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  6 in total

Review 1.  Extensor mechanism ruptures.

Authors:  Reha N Tandogan; Esref Terzi; Enrique Gomez-Barrena; Bruno Violante; Asim Kayaalp
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Outcomes After Repair of Quadriceps Tendon Rupture in Patients Aged 40 Years and Younger.

Authors:  Somnath Rao; Emma E Johnson; Taylor D'Amore; Stanley Szeto; Peters Otlans; Steven B Cohen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  Simultaneous Ipsilateral Quadriceps and Triceps Tendon Rupture in a Patient with End-Stage Renal Failure.

Authors:  Kevin Moerenhout; Georgios Gkagkalis; Benoit Benoit; Georges Yves Laflamme
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2018-08-05

Review 4.  Complex ruptures of the quadriceps tendon: a systematic review of surgical procedures and outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Oliva; Emanuela Marsilio; Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  A Survey of Treatment Trends for Acute Quadriceps Tendon Ruptures Among North American Surgeons.

Authors:  Norah-Faye Matthies; Ryan A Paul; Tim Dwyer; Jaskarndip Chahal; Daniel Whelan
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-30

6.  Clinical outcomes after treatment of quadriceps tendon ruptures show equal results independent of suture anchor or transosseus repair technique used - A pilot study.

Authors:  Stefan Plesser; Mohammad Keilani; Gyoergy Vekszler; Timothy Hasenoehrl; Stefano Palma; Martin Reschl; Richard Crevenna; Stefan Hajdu; Harald Kurt Widhalm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.