Literature DB >> 28372841

Improved accuracy of an tandem liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method measuring 24R,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D metabolites in serum using unspiked controls and its application to determining cross-reactivity of a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay.

Kirsten G Dowling1, George Hull2, Jouko Sundvall3, Christel Lamberg-Allardt4, Kevin D Cashman5.   

Abstract

Measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] is considered the best indicator of vitamin D status. Two minor vitamin D metabolites are common interferences encountered in 25(OH)D assays. The first is 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [3-epi-25(OH)D3], which if not chromatographically resolved from 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3], can overestimate 25(OH)D concentrations. The second is 24R,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [24R,25(OH)2D3], which can cross-react with the antibodies in 25(OH)D immunoassays. Our aim was to develop an LC-MS/MS method capable of detecting both 3-epi-25(OH)D3 and 24R,25(OH)2D3 in serum without the use of a derivatization agent. We report an isotope dilution LC-MS/MS method, with electrospray ionization in the positive mode, that can simultaneously detect 24R,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3, 3-epi-25(OH)D3, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D2. The method employs a cost-effective liquid-liquid extraction using only 150μL of sera and a total run time of 10min. Method performance was assessed by using quality controls made from pooled sera as an alternative to sera spiked with analytes. Biobanked samples, originally analyzed by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), were re-analyzed with this method to determine the contribution of 24R,25(OH)2D3 cross-reactivity to 25(OH)D measurement bias. The CMIA over-estimation of 25(OH)D measurements relative to LC-MS/MS was found to depend on both 25(OH)D and 24R,25(OH)2D3 concentrations.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  25-hydroxyvitamin D; Cross-reactivity; Immunoassay; LC–MS/MS; Quality control; Vitamin D metabolites

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28372841     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.03.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of vitamin D metabolites in wild and captive baboons.

Authors:  Toni E Ziegler; Amita Kapoor; Neil C Binkley; Karen S Rice; Jeffrey Rogers; Clifford J Jolly; Jane E Phillips-Conroy
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 2.  Vitamin D testing: advantages and limits of the current assays.

Authors:  Barbara Altieri; Etienne Cavalier; Harjit Pal Bhattoa; Faustino R Pérez-López; María T López-Baena; Gonzalo R Pérez-Roncero; Peter Chedraui; Cedric Annweiler; Silvia Della Casa; Sieglinde Zelzer; Markus Herrmann; Antongiulio Faggiano; Annamaria Colao; Michael F Holick
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  The serum vitamin D metabolome: What we know and what is still to discover.

Authors:  Robert C Tuckey; Chloe Y S Cheng; Andrzej T Slominski
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 4.  Vitamin D Metabolism Revised: Fall of Dogmas.

Authors:  Roger Bouillon; Dan Bikle
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration and Risk of Islet Autoimmunity.

Authors:  Jill M Norris; Hye-Seung Lee; Brittni Frederiksen; Iris Erlund; Ulla Uusitalo; Jimin Yang; Åke Lernmark; Olli Simell; Jorma Toppari; Marian Rewers; Anette-G Ziegler; Jin-Xiong She; Suna Onengut-Gumuscu; Wei-Min Chen; Stephen S Rich; Jouko Sundvall; Beena Akolkar; Jeffrey Krischer; Suvi M Virtanen; William Hagopian
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 9.337

Review 6.  The When, What & How of Measuring Vitamin D Metabolism in Clinical Medicine.

Authors:  Niek F Dirks; Mariëtte T Ackermans; Paul Lips; Renate T de Jongh; Marc G Vervloet; Robert de Jonge; Annemieke C Heijboer
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Clinical Significance of Analysis of Vitamin D Status in Various Diseases.

Authors:  Magdalena Kowalówka; Anna K Główka; Marta Karaźniewicz-Łada; Grzegorz Kosewski
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.