Flavio Uribe1, Leyla Davoody1, Rana Mehr1, Yasas S N Jayaratne1, Khalid Almas2, Takanori Sobue3, Veerasathpurush Allareddy4, Ravindra Nanda5. 1. Division of Orthodontics, Department of Craniofacial Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, USA. 2. Department of Preventive Dental Science, University of Dammam, Saudi Arabia. 3. Division of Periodontics, Department of Oral Health and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, USA. 4. Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, The University of Iowa, USA. 5. Division of Orthodontics, Department of Craniofacial Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this clinical trial was to investigate the duration of mandibular-crowding alleviation with piezotome-corticision orthodontics compared with conventional orthodontics. DESIGN: Single-centre, two-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Orthodontic clinic at the University of Connecticut. ETHICAL APPROVAL: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB # 12-0147-2). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-one adult subjects from a single centre with more than 5mm of mandibular anterior crowding were randomly allocated using block randomization into experimental and control groups. The experimental group received a corticision procedure with a piezotome on the labial aspect of the mandibular incisors in conjunction to a self-ligation fixed orthodontic appliance. The control group received the self-ligation fixed orthodontic appliance and no corticision. Same archwire sequence (0.014 inch followed by 0.014 × 0.025 inch copper-nickel-titanium) was followed for both groups. Mandibular study casts taken every 4-5 weeks were used to assess changes in the irregularity index by blinded outcome assessors. OUTCOME MEASURES: The time to alignment was calculated in days. RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects (16 experimental and 13 control) completed the study. Overall, no significant difference in the time required to correct mandibular crowding with piezotome-corticision assisted (102.1 ± 34.7 days; 95% CI, 83.6 to 120.6) and conventional orthodontics (112 ± 46.2 days; 95% CI, 84-139.9) was observed. No complications with treatment or unintended consequences were observed on any of the subjects. LIMITATIONS: A high attrition rate. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized clinical trial found no evidence that piezotome-corticision assisted orthodontics was more efficient in alleviating mandibular anterior crowding. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02026258. FUNDING: Division of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this clinical trial was to investigate the duration of mandibular-crowding alleviation with piezotome-corticision orthodontics compared with conventional orthodontics. DESIGN: Single-centre, two-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Orthodontic clinic at the University of Connecticut. ETHICAL APPROVAL: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB # 12-0147-2). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-one adult subjects from a single centre with more than 5mm of mandibular anterior crowding were randomly allocated using block randomization into experimental and control groups. The experimental group received a corticision procedure with a piezotome on the labial aspect of the mandibular incisors in conjunction to a self-ligation fixed orthodontic appliance. The control group received the self-ligation fixed orthodontic appliance and no corticision. Same archwire sequence (0.014 inch followed by 0.014 × 0.025 inch copper-nickel-titanium) was followed for both groups. Mandibular study casts taken every 4-5 weeks were used to assess changes in the irregularity index by blinded outcome assessors. OUTCOME MEASURES: The time to alignment was calculated in days. RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects (16 experimental and 13 control) completed the study. Overall, no significant difference in the time required to correct mandibular crowding with piezotome-corticision assisted (102.1 ± 34.7 days; 95% CI, 83.6 to 120.6) and conventional orthodontics (112 ± 46.2 days; 95% CI, 84-139.9) was observed. No complications with treatment or unintended consequences were observed on any of the subjects. LIMITATIONS: A high attrition rate. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized clinical trial found no evidence that piezotome-corticision assisted orthodontics was more efficient in alleviating mandibular anterior crowding. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02026258. FUNDING: Division of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.