Annemarie A H Schalkwijk1, Babette C van der Zwaard1, Giel Nijpels1, Petra J M Elders1, Lucinda Platt2. 1. Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Abstract
Background: Childhood overweight/obesity has been associated with environmental, parenting and socioeconomic status (SES) factors. This paper assesses the influence of the amount of green space, accessibility to a garden and neighbourhood condition on being overweight/obese. It investigates whether parental behaviours moderate or mediate this influence and evaluates the interaction of SES with environmental context. Methods: 6467 children from the UK Millennium Cohort Study living in England were analysed. We estimated logistic regressions to examine the initial association between environment and overweight. Subsequently, parenting determinants comprising: food consumption, physical activity, rules and regularity were evaluated as moderators or mediators. Lastly SES related variables were tested as moderators or mediators of the associations. Results: Statistically significant associations were found between low levels of green space, no access to a garden, run down area and childhood overweight/obesity [odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] respectively: 1.14 (1.02-1.27), 1.35 (1.16-1.58), 1.22 (1.05-1.42)]. None of the parental constructs mediated or moderated the relationships between environment and childhood overweight/obesity. Including SES, parental education moderated the effect of environmental context. Specifically, among lower educated households lack of garden access and less green space was associated with overweight/obesity; and among higher educated households poor neighbourhood condition influenced the probability of overweight/obesity respectively: 1.38 (1.12-1.70) OR 1.38, 95% CI (1.21-1.70). Conclusions: This study suggests that limits on access to outdoor space are associated with future childhood overweight/obesity although the ways in which this occurs are moderated by parental education level.
Background: Childhood overweight/obesity has been associated with environmental, parenting and socioeconomic status (SES) factors. This paper assesses the influence of the amount of green space, accessibility to a garden and neighbourhood condition on being overweight/obese. It investigates whether parental behaviours moderate or mediate this influence and evaluates the interaction of SES with environmental context. Methods: 6467 children from the UK Millennium Cohort Study living in England were analysed. We estimated logistic regressions to examine the initial association between environment and overweight. Subsequently, parenting determinants comprising: food consumption, physical activity, rules and regularity were evaluated as moderators or mediators. Lastly SES related variables were tested as moderators or mediators of the associations. Results: Statistically significant associations were found between low levels of green space, no access to a garden, run down area and childhood overweight/obesity [odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] respectively: 1.14 (1.02-1.27), 1.35 (1.16-1.58), 1.22 (1.05-1.42)]. None of the parental constructs mediated or moderated the relationships between environment and childhood overweight/obesity. Including SES, parental education moderated the effect of environmental context. Specifically, among lower educated households lack of garden access and less green space was associated with overweight/obesity; and among higher educated households poor neighbourhood condition influenced the probability of overweight/obesity respectively: 1.38 (1.12-1.70) OR 1.38, 95% CI (1.21-1.70). Conclusions: This study suggests that limits on access to outdoor space are associated with future childhood overweight/obesity although the ways in which this occurs are moderated by parental education level.
Authors: Inga Petraviciene; Regina Grazuleviciene; Sandra Andrusaityte; Audrius Dedele; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alice R Kininmonth; Andrea D Smith; Clare H Llewellyn; Louise Dye; Clare L Lawton; Alison Fildes Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Juuli-Mari Kokkonen; Henna Vepsäläinen; Anna Abdollahi; Hanna Paasio; Samuli Ranta; Maijaliisa Erkkola; Eva Roos; Carola Ray Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Yusheng Zhou; Christoph Buck; Werner Maier; Thomas von Lengerke; Ulla Walter; Maren Dreier Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alessandro Rigolon; Matthew H E M Browning; Olivia McAnirlin; Hyunseo Violet Yoon Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 3.390