Shi-Chang Chen1, Yi-Ming Zeng1, Meng-Ning Yan1, Bing Yue1, Jun Zhang1, You Wang1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Femoral component overhang in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported in previous studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of femoral component flexion implantation on mediolateral bone-prosthetic fit in TKA. METHODS: Virtual prosthesis implantations were performed on computed tomographic models of 10 Chinese knees with femoral prostheses of the Advance Medial-Pivot knee system (MicroPort Orthopedics, Arlington, TN, USA), with the femoral component positioned at 0°, 3°, or 6° of flexion in the sagittal plane. For each degree of flexion implantation, the differences between the knee and femoral component models on the lateral and medial sides at trochlea (zone 1), anterior-distal condyle (zone 2), posterior-distal condyle (zone 3), and posterior condyle (zone 4) were measured. Positive difference values indicate component overhang, and negative difference values indicate component underhang. The values of component overhang (underhang) in each zone were statistically analyzed across the 3° of flexion implantation. RESULTS: With a greater degree of flexion implantation, overhang was reduced and even changed to underhang. With 0° of flexion implantation, an overhang exceeding 3 mm existed mainly on the medial side of zone 1 (5.81 mm) and the lateral side of zone 2 (3.39 mm). With 3° of flexion, overhang exceeding 3 mm was observed only on the medial side of zone 1 (3.10 mm), and underhang was observed only on the medial side of zone 4 (-0.32 mm). No overhang exceeding 3 mm was observed for 6° of flexion, while underhang was observed except on the lateral sides of zone 2 (1.32 mm) and zone 4 (1.10 mm) and on the medial side of zone 1 (1.54 mm). A significant difference in overhang values on the lateral and medial sides of zone 1 was observed between 0 and 6° of flexion (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that femoral component flexion implantation by 3° can reduce excessive overhang, although 3.10 mm of overhang remained at the medial side of zone 1. Conversely, 6° of flexion implantation can avoid 3 mm of overhang for any zone, but increases the risk of underhang. Slight flexion implantation may be an effective alternative technique to prevent excessive component overhang, especially in the trochlea and anterior region of the distal condyle, in Chinese patients with standard TKA prostheses.
OBJECTIVE:Femoral component overhang in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported in previous studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of femoral component flexion implantation on mediolateral bone-prosthetic fit in TKA. METHODS: Virtual prosthesis implantations were performed on computed tomographic models of 10 Chinese knees with femoral prostheses of the Advance Medial-Pivot knee system (MicroPort Orthopedics, Arlington, TN, USA), with the femoral component positioned at 0°, 3°, or 6° of flexion in the sagittal plane. For each degree of flexion implantation, the differences between the knee and femoral component models on the lateral and medial sides at trochlea (zone 1), anterior-distal condyle (zone 2), posterior-distal condyle (zone 3), and posterior condyle (zone 4) were measured. Positive difference values indicate component overhang, and negative difference values indicate component underhang. The values of component overhang (underhang) in each zone were statistically analyzed across the 3° of flexion implantation. RESULTS: With a greater degree of flexion implantation, overhang was reduced and even changed to underhang. With 0° of flexion implantation, an overhang exceeding 3 mm existed mainly on the medial side of zone 1 (5.81 mm) and the lateral side of zone 2 (3.39 mm). With 3° of flexion, overhang exceeding 3 mm was observed only on the medial side of zone 1 (3.10 mm), and underhang was observed only on the medial side of zone 4 (-0.32 mm). No overhang exceeding 3 mm was observed for 6° of flexion, while underhang was observed except on the lateral sides of zone 2 (1.32 mm) and zone 4 (1.10 mm) and on the medial side of zone 1 (1.54 mm). A significant difference in overhang values on the lateral and medial sides of zone 1 was observed between 0 and 6° of flexion (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that femoral component flexion implantation by 3° can reduce excessive overhang, although 3.10 mm of overhang remained at the medial side of zone 1. Conversely, 6° of flexion implantation can avoid 3 mm of overhang for any zone, but increases the risk of underhang. Slight flexion implantation may be an effective alternative technique to prevent excessive component overhang, especially in the trochlea and anterior region of the distal condyle, in Chinese patients with standard TKA prostheses.
Authors: Kirby Hitt; John R Shurman; Kenneth Greene; Joseph McCarthy; Joseph Moskal; Tim Hoeman; Michael A Mont Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2003 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Marco A Marra; Marta Strzelczak; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Sebastiaan A W van de Groes; Dennis Janssen; Bart F J M Koopman; Nico Verdonschot; Ate B Wymenga Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 4.342