Jian-Qun Wu1, Sheng-Hui Ma2, Song Liu3, Cheng-He Qin1, Dan Jin1, Bin Yu1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 2. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal posterior screw placement and the geometry of safe zones for screw insertion in the talar neck. METHODS: Computed tomography data for 15 normal feet were imported into Mimics 10.01 software for 3-dimensional reconstruction; 4.0-mm-diameter screws were simulated from the lateral tubercle of the posterior process of the talus to the talar head. The range of screw paths trajectories and screw lengths at nine locations that did not breach the cortex of the talus were evaluated. In addition, the farthest (point a) and nearest point (point b) of the safe zone to the subtalar joint at each location, the anteversion angle (angle A), which is parallel to the sagittal plane, and the horizontal angle (angle B), which is perpendicular to the sagittal plane, were measured. RESULTS: The safe zone was mainly between the 30% location and the 60% location; the width of each safe zone was 13.6° ± 1.4°; the maximum height of each safe zone was 7.8° ± 1.2°. The height of the safe zone was lowest at the 30% location (4.5°) and highest at the 50% location (7.3°). The mixed safe zone of all tali was between the 50% location and the 60% location. When a screw was inserted at point a, the safe entry distance (screw length) ranged from 48.8 to 49.5 mm, and when inserted to point b, the distance ranged from 48.2 to 48.9 mm. And inserting a 48.7 mm screw, 5.6° laterally and 7.4° superiorly, from the lateral tubercle of the posterior process of the talus towards the talar head is safest. CONCLUSION: The safe zone of posterior screw fixation have been defined applying to most talus, assuming the fractures are well reduced, this may strengthen the stability, shorten the operation time and reduce the incidence of surgical complications.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal posterior screw placement and the geometry of safe zones for screw insertion in the talar neck. METHODS: Computed tomography data for 15 normal feet were imported into Mimics 10.01 software for 3-dimensional reconstruction; 4.0-mm-diameter screws were simulated from the lateral tubercle of the posterior process of the talus to the talar head. The range of screw paths trajectories and screw lengths at nine locations that did not breach the cortex of the talus were evaluated. In addition, the farthest (point a) and nearest point (point b) of the safe zone to the subtalar joint at each location, the anteversion angle (angle A), which is parallel to the sagittal plane, and the horizontal angle (angle B), which is perpendicular to the sagittal plane, were measured. RESULTS: The safe zone was mainly between the 30% location and the 60% location; the width of each safe zone was 13.6° ± 1.4°; the maximum height of each safe zone was 7.8° ± 1.2°. The height of the safe zone was lowest at the 30% location (4.5°) and highest at the 50% location (7.3°). The mixed safe zone of all tali was between the 50% location and the 60% location. When a screw was inserted at point a, the safe entry distance (screw length) ranged from 48.8 to 49.5 mm, and when inserted to point b, the distance ranged from 48.2 to 48.9 mm. And inserting a 48.7 mm screw, 5.6° laterally and 7.4° superiorly, from the lateral tubercle of the posterior process of the talus towards the talar head is safest. CONCLUSION: The safe zone of posterior screw fixation have been defined applying to most talus, assuming the fractures are well reduced, this may strengthen the stability, shorten the operation time and reduce the incidence of surgical complications.
Authors: Mohammed Attiah; David W Sanders; Gonzalo Valdivia; Ian Cooper; Louis Ferreira; Mark D MacLeod; James A Johnson Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.512