James Morgan1,2, Victoria Green1,2, John Blair1,2. 1. South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Warwick, UK. 2. University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of medical students feel underprepared for clinical practice, especially in skills such as decision making, prioritisation and prescribing. Changes to medical curricula, including assistantships and shadowing, provide supervised practise, but students remain unable to fully take responsibility for patient care. Simulation may assist in addressing this deficit. A simulation course entitled 'Simulated ward round and professional skills' (SWAPS) was developed to improve student preparation for clinical practice. METHODS: Preliminary work surveyed 22 foundation doctors to identify perceived areas of weakness and to guide the learning outcomes of the course. Following the design and development of the course, 133 final-year medical students were observed completing a 60-minute simulation scenario aimed at providing experiential learning in a ward environment, reflecting professional practice. Students received structured feedback and completed pre- and post-course questionnaires to evaluate changes in confidence over the learning domains. Qualitative feedback was also collected. A significant proportion of medical students feel underprepared for clinical practice RESULTS: The p values were significant in all assessed domains, indicating a perceived improvement in confidence following the SWAPS course. Qualitative feedback highlighted the perceived utility of the course in exposing students to clinical ward-based scenarios infrequently encountered in their medical curriculum. Students praised the personal feedback received and realism of the simulation. DISCUSSION: This paper contributes to the growing body of literature supporting the use of simulation to replicate a ward round and the daily roles of a junior doctor. The SWAPS course seems to empower students to take responsibility for clinical decision making and experience some of the realities of foundation training in a simulated setting.
BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of medical students feel underprepared for clinical practice, especially in skills such as decision making, prioritisation and prescribing. Changes to medical curricula, including assistantships and shadowing, provide supervised practise, but students remain unable to fully take responsibility for patient care. Simulation may assist in addressing this deficit. A simulation course entitled 'Simulated ward round and professional skills' (SWAPS) was developed to improve student preparation for clinical practice. METHODS: Preliminary work surveyed 22 foundation doctors to identify perceived areas of weakness and to guide the learning outcomes of the course. Following the design and development of the course, 133 final-year medical students were observed completing a 60-minute simulation scenario aimed at providing experiential learning in a ward environment, reflecting professional practice. Students received structured feedback and completed pre- and post-course questionnaires to evaluate changes in confidence over the learning domains. Qualitative feedback was also collected. A significant proportion of medical students feel underprepared for clinical practice RESULTS: The p values were significant in all assessed domains, indicating a perceived improvement in confidence following the SWAPS course. Qualitative feedback highlighted the perceived utility of the course in exposing students to clinical ward-based scenarios infrequently encountered in their medical curriculum. Students praised the personal feedback received and realism of the simulation. DISCUSSION: This paper contributes to the growing body of literature supporting the use of simulation to replicate a ward round and the daily roles of a junior doctor. The SWAPS course seems to empower students to take responsibility for clinical decision making and experience some of the realities of foundation training in a simulated setting.
Authors: Elena Ramírez; Alberto Martín; Yuri Villán; Miguel Lorente; Jonay Ojeda; Marta Moro; Carmen Vara; Miguel Avenza; María J Domingo; Pablo Alonso; María J Asensio; José A Blázquez; Rafael Hernández; Jesús Frías; Ana Frank Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 1.817