Literature DB >> 28370687

Mid-trimester sonographic cervical consistency index to predict spontaneous preterm birth in a low-risk population.

N Baños1, C Murillo-Bravo1, C Julià1, F Migliorelli1, A Perez-Moreno2, J Ríos3, E Gratacós1, L Valentin4, M Palacio1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of mid-trimester sonographic cervical consistency index (CCI) for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) in low-risk pregnancies and to compare its performance with that of mid-trimester sonographic cervical-length (CL) measurement.
METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of women with a singleton pregnancy examined by ultrasound at 19 + 0 to 24 + 6 weeks' gestation. All women underwent transvaginal ultrasound examination of the cervix, but CCI and CL were measured, offline, only in women without a risk factor for sPTB. Staff and participants were blinded to CL and CCI results. CCI was obtained by calculating the ratio between the anteroposterior diameter of the uterine cervix at maximum compression and at rest. The primary outcome was prediction of sPTB before 37 + 0 weeks. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were produced and sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the optimal cut-off based on the ROC curve and for the 1st , 5th and 10th centiles of CCI and CL. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to estimate intra- and interobserver agreement and reliability for measurement of CCI and CL.
RESULTS: Of the 749 women who underwent ultrasound examination of the cervix, 532 were included for analysis. The rates of sPTB before 37 + 0 and before 34 + 0 weeks were 4.1% (22/532) and 1.3% (7/532), respectively. The rates of short cervix < 25 mm and ≤ 20 mm were 0.9% (5/532) and 0.4% (2/532), respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) with regard to predicting sPTB before 37 + 0 weeks was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.93) for CCI compared with 0.68 (95% CI, 0.56-0.81) for CL (P = 0.03). The optimal cut-off based on the ROC curve was 64.6% for CCI (sensitivity, 77.3%; specificity, 82.7%) and that for CL was 37.9 mm (sensitivity, 72.7%; specificity, 61.2%). The AUC with regard to predicting sPTB before 34 + 0 weeks was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.71-1.0) for CCI compared with 0.71 (95% CI, 0.47-0.94) for CL (P = 0.25). The optimal cut-off based on the ROC curve was 63.6% for CCI (sensitivity, 85.7%; specificity, 84.0%) and that for CL was 37.9 mm (sensitivity, 85.7%; specificity, 61.3%). Intraobserver ICC was > 0.90 both for CCI and CL, while interobserver ICC was 0.89 for CCI and 0.90 for CL.
CONCLUSIONS: Second-trimester CCI is a better predictor of sPTB < 37 weeks in low-risk pregnancies than is CL. External validation is needed as well as studies assessing the value of CCI as a screening tool in unselected and high-risk populations.
Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical consistency index; cervical-length measurements; cervix uteri; spontaneous preterm birth; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28370687     DOI: 10.1002/uog.17482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  8 in total

Review 1.  Screening for spontaneous preterm birth and resultant therapies to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality: A review.

Authors:  Angelica V Glover; Tracy A Manuck
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  New techniques in evaluation of the cervix.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich; Lindsey Carlson
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Mid-Trimester Cervical Consistency Index and Cervical Length to Predict Spontaneous Preterm Birth in a High-Risk Population.

Authors:  Núria Baños; Carla Julià; Núria Lorente; Silvia Ferrero; Teresa Cobo; Eduard Gratacos; Montse Palacio
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2018-03-19

4.  Aspiration technique-based device is more reliable in cervical stiffness assessment than digital palpation.

Authors:  Sabrina Badir; Laura Bernardi; Francisco Feijó Delgado; Katharina Quack Loetscher; Gundula Hebisch; Irene Hoesli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Prediction of Preterm Birth: Maternal Characteristics, Ultrasound Markers, and Biomarkers: An Updated Overview.

Authors:  Zeynep Asli Oskovi Kaplan; A Seval Ozgu-Erdinc
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2018-10-10

6.  Repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative cervical strain elastography (E-Cervix) in pregnancy.

Authors:  Jakub Mlodawski; Marta Mlodawska; Justyna Plusajska; Karolina Detka; Agata Michalska; Grzegorz Swiercz; Marek Sikorski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The amniotic fluid cell-free transcriptome in spontaneous preterm labor.

Authors:  Gaurav Bhatti; Roberto Romero; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez; Roger Pique-Regi; Percy Pacora; Eunjung Jung; Lami Yeo; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Mahendra Kavdia; Adi L Tarca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Standardization of measurement of cervical elastography, its reproducibility, and analysis of baseline clinical factors affecting elastographic parameters.

Authors:  Hyun-Joo Seol; Ji-Hee Sung; Won Joon Seong; Hyun Mi Kim; Hyun Soo Park; Hayan Kwon; Han-Sung Hwang; Yun Ji Jung; Ja-Young Kwon; Soo-Young Oh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-12-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.