Literature DB >> 28370637

Cost-effectiveness analysis of single-use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) to reduce surgical site complications (SSC) in routine primary hip and knee replacements.

Leo M Nherera1, Paul Trueman1, Sudheer L Karlakki2.   

Abstract

We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of single-use negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing primary hip and knee replacements using effectiveness data from a recently completed non-blinded randomized controlled trial. A decision analytic model was developed from UK National Health Service perspective using data from a single-centre trial. 220 patients were randomized to treatment with either single-use negative pressure wound therapy or standard care i.e., film dressings of clinician choice and followed for 6 weeks. Outcomes included dressing changes, length of stay, surgical site complications, cost and quality adjusted life years. The randomized controlled trial reported a reduction in dressing changes (p = 0.002), SSC (p = 0.06) and LOS (p = 0.07) in favor of single-use negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard care. The model estimated 0.116 and 0.115 QALY gained, 0.98 and 0.92 complications avoided for single-use negative pressure wound therapy and standard care, respectively. The cost/patient was £5,602 ($7,954) and £6,713 ($9,559) for single-use negative pressure wound therapy and standard care respectively resulting in cost-saving of £1,132 ($1,607) in favor of single-use negative pressure wound therapy. Greater savings were observed in subgroups of higher risk patients with BMI ≥ 35 and ASA ≥ 3 i.e., £7,955 ($11,296) and £7,248 ($10,293), respectively. The findings were robust to a range of sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, single-use negative pressure wound therapy can be considered a cost saving intervention to reduce surgical site complications following primary hip and knee replacements compared with standard care. Providers should consider targeting therapy to those patients at elevated risk of surgical site complications to maximize efficiency.
© 2017 The Authors. Wound Repair and Regeneration published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28370637     DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  18 in total

Review 1.  The Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Incisions in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  David Cagney; Lydia Simmons; Donal Peter O'Leary; Mark Corrigan; Louise Kelly; M J O'Sullivan; Aaron Liew; Henry Paul Redmond
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Are high-risk patient and revision arthroplasty effective indications for closed-incisional negative-pressure wound therapy after total hip or knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Ho Kim; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Negative pressure wound therapy reduces the incidence of postoperative wound dehiscence and surgical site infections after total knee arthroplasty in patients with obesity.

Authors:  Qi-Chun Song; Dong Li; Yan Zhao; Guang-Yang Zhang; Dong-Long Shang; Li-Hong Fan; Xiao-Qian Dang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 4.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; Chunhu Shi; En Lin Goh; Elizabeth Ma Murphy; Adam Reid; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-26

5.  Prevention of postoperative surgical wound complications in ankle and distal tibia fractures: results of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Authors:  Gianluca Canton; Roberto Fattori; Emanuele Pinzani; Luca Monticelli; Chiara Ratti; Luigi Murena
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-12-30

6.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Joan Webster; Zhenmi Liu; Gill Norman; Jo C Dumville; Laura Chiverton; Paul Scuffham; Monica Stankiewicz; Wendy P Chaboyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-26

7.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; En Lin Goh; Jo C Dumville; Chunhu Shi; Zhenmi Liu; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Adam Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-01

8.  The use of negative-pressure wound therapy after total knee arthroplasty is effective for reducing complications and the need for reintervention.

Authors:  Camilo Partezani Helito; Marcel Faraco Sobrado; Pedro Nogueira Giglio; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; José Ricardo Pécora; Marco Kawamura Demange; Riccardo Gomes Gobbi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; En Lin Goh; Jo C Dumville; Chunhu Shi; Zhenmi Liu; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Adam Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-15

Review 10.  Meta-Analysis of Comparative Trials Evaluating a Prophylactic Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System for the Prevention of Surgical Site Complications.

Authors:  Vicki Strugala; Robin Martin
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.