| Literature DB >> 28370491 |
Avery I McIntosh1,2, Gheorghe Doros1, Edward C Jones-López2, Mary Gaeddert2, Helen E Jenkins1, Patricia Marques-Rodrigues3, Jerrold J Ellner2, Reynaldo Dietze3, Laura F White1.
Abstract
Household contact studies, a mainstay of tuberculosis transmission research, often assume that tuberculosis-infected household contacts of an index case were infected within the household. However, strain genotyping has provided evidence against this assumption. Understanding the household versus community infection dynamic is essential for designing interventions. The misattribution of infection sources can also bias household transmission predictor estimates. We present a household-community transmission model that estimates the probability of community infection, that is, the probability that a household contact of an index case was actually infected from a source outside the home and simultaneously estimates transmission predictors. We show through simulation that our method accurately predicts the probability of community infection in several scenarios and that not accounting for community-acquired infection in household contact studies can bias risk factor estimates. Applying the model to data from Vitória, Brazil, produced household risk factor estimates similar to two other standard methods for age and sex. However, our model gave different estimates for sleeping proximity to index case and disease severity score. These results show that estimating both the probability of community infection and household transmission predictors is feasible and that standard tuberculosis transmission models likely underestimate the risk for two important transmission predictors.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian; bias; community; hierarchical models; household; infection; mixed effects models; risk factor; tuberculosis
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28370491 PMCID: PMC5505735 DOI: 10.1002/sim.7303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stat Med ISSN: 0277-6715 Impact factor: 2.373