V Aggarwal1, M Singla2, S Miglani1, S Kohli1, V Sharma2, S S Bhasin1. 1. Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India. 2. Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, SGT Dental College, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the efficacy of 0.2 mL vs. 0.6 mL of 2% lidocaine when given as a supplementary intraligamentary injection after a failed inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). METHODOLOGY:Ninety-seven adult patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpits received an IANB and root canal treatment was initiated. Pain during treatment was recorded using a visual analogue scale (Heft-Parker VAS). Patients with unsuccessful anaesthesia (n = 78) randomly received intraligamentary injection of either 0.2 mL or 0.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1 : 80 000 epinephrine. Root canal treatment was reinitiated. Success after primary injection or supplementary injection was defined as no or mild pain (HP VAS score ≤54 mm) during access preparation and root canal instrumentation. Heart rate was monitored using a finger pulse oximeter. The anaesthetic success rates were analysed with Pearson chi-square test at 5% significance levels. The heart rate changes were analysed using t-tests. RESULTS: The intraligamentary injections with 0.2 mL solution gave an anaesthetic success rate of 64%, whilst the 0.6 mL was successful in 84% of cases with failed primary IANB. (χ2 = 4.3, P = 0.03). There was no significant effect of the volume of intraligamentary injection on the change in heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the volume of intraligamentary injection improved the success rates after a failed primary anaesthetic injection.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To investigate the efficacy of 0.2 mL vs. 0.6 mL of 2% lidocaine when given as a supplementary intraligamentary injection after a failed inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). METHODOLOGY: Ninety-seven adult patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpits received an IANB and root canal treatment was initiated. Pain during treatment was recorded using a visual analogue scale (Heft-Parker VAS). Patients with unsuccessful anaesthesia (n = 78) randomly received intraligamentary injection of either 0.2 mL or 0.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1 : 80 000 epinephrine. Root canal treatment was reinitiated. Success after primary injection or supplementary injection was defined as no or mild pain (HP VAS score ≤54 mm) during access preparation and root canal instrumentation. Heart rate was monitored using a finger pulse oximeter. The anaesthetic success rates were analysed with Pearson chi-square test at 5% significance levels. The heart rate changes were analysed using t-tests. RESULTS: The intraligamentary injections with 0.2 mL solution gave an anaesthetic success rate of 64%, whilst the 0.6 mL was successful in 84% of cases with failed primary IANB. (χ2 = 4.3, P = 0.03). There was no significant effect of the volume of intraligamentary injection on the change in heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the volume of intraligamentary injection improved the success rates after a failed primary anaesthetic injection.
Authors: Khalid Gufran; Mubashir Baig Mirza; Ali Robaian; Abdullah Saad Alqahtani; Nasser Raqe Alqhtani; Mohammed Alasqah; Abdulaziz Mohammad Alsakr Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2022-07-26