Literature DB >> 28370306

Is allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis still indicated at the time of molecular markers and JAK inhibitors era?

Elsa Lestang1, Pierre Peterlin1, Yannick Le Bris2, Viviane Dubruille1, Jacques Delaunay1, Catherine Godon2, Olivier Theisen2, Nicolas Blin1, Beatrice Mahe1, Thomas Gastinne1, Alice Garnier1, Cyrille Touzeau1, Maud Voldoire1, Marie C Bene2, Steven Le Gouill1, Noel Milpied1, Mohamad Mohty1, Philippe Moreau1, Thierry Guillaume1, Patrice Chevallier1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The role of allogenic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is still debated in myelofibrosis (MF).
METHODS: A retrospective analyzed was performed to compare the outcome of 71 patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk Dynamic International Prognosis Scoring System+ (DIPSS+) primary (PMF) or secondary (SMF) myelofibrosis with an indication of ASCT as they ultimately underwent the procedure (n=34) or not (n=37).
RESULTS: Five-year overall survival (OS) was not statistically different between both groups (allograft: 52% vs no allograft: 34%, P=.12). However, progression to myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia at 5 years was significantly lower in transplanted patients (14% vs 50%, P=.01). In univariate analysis, 5-year OS was significantly higher for transplanted vs non-transplanted patients with unfavorable karyotype (75% vs 0%, P=.001), SMF (71% vs 20%, P=.001) or high DIPSS+ score (46% vs 15%, P=.03). There was also a trend for better 5-year OS in allografted patients with high JAK2V617F burden (>65%) (75% vs 8%, P=.07). Interestingly, the survival of patients who did not proceed to ASCT was dramatically increased by the use of ruxolitinib.
CONCLUSIONS: Not all intermediate-2/high-risk DIPSS+ MF patients benefit from ASCT, especially since the introduction of JAK2 inhibitors.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  JAK inhibitor; JAK2; allogeneic transplantation; calreticuline; intent-to-treat analysis; myeloproliferative leukemia virus; primary myelofibrosis; secondary myelofibrosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28370306     DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Haematol        ISSN: 0902-4441            Impact factor:   2.997


  3 in total

1.  Myelofibrosis patients can develop extramedullary complications including renal amyloidosis and sclerosing hematopoietic tumor while otherwise meeting traditional measures of ruxolitinib response.

Authors:  Daria V Babushok; Ernest J Nelson; Jennifer J D Morrissette; Shivam Joshi; Matthew B Palmer; Dale Frank; Carolyn L Cambor; Elizabeth O Hexner
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2018-09-19

2.  Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Myelofibrosis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Amar H Sheth; Shaurey Vetsa; Alyssa Grimshaw; Smith Giri; Nikolai A Podoltsev; Lohith Gowda; Roni Tamari; Martin S Tallman; Raajit K Rampal; Amer M Zeidan; Maximilian Stahl
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2021-05-28

3.  Peritoneal carcinomatosis-like implants of extramedullary hematopoiesis. An insolite occurrence during splenectomy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Marco Casaccia; Rosario Fornaro; Marco Frascio; Denise Palombo; Cesare Stabilini; Emma Firpo; Ezio Gianetta
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-10-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.