Literature DB >> 28370164

Trends in age and red blood cell donation habits among several racial/ethnic minority groups in the United States.

Mark H Yazer1, Ralph Vassallo2, Meghan Delaney3, Marc Germain4, Matthew S Karafin5, Merlyn Sayers6, Leo van de Watering7, Beth H Shaz8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To meet the needs of a diverse patient population, an adequate supply of red blood cells (RBCs) from ethnic/racial minority donors is essential. We previously described the 10-year changes in minority blood donation in the United States. This study describes donation patterns by donor status, age, and race/ethnicity. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data on the age and the number of unique black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, and white RBC donors were obtained from eight US blood collectors for 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2015. Donors self-identified their race/ethnicity. First-time (FT) and repeat (R) donors were analyzed separately.
RESULTS: Overall, for both FT and R donor groups, whites constituted the majority of unique donors (FT 66.7% and R 82.7%) and also donated the greatest proportion of RBC units (FT 66.6% and R 83.8%). Donors less than 20 years old comprised the greatest proportion of FT donors for all racial/ethnic groups (39.2%) and had the highest mean number of RBC donations per donor (1.12) among FT donors. Conversely, R donors less than 20 years old had some of the lowest mean number of RBC donations per donor (1.55) among R donors, whereas R donors at least 60 years old had the highest mean (1.88). Year by year, the percentage of FT donors who were less than 20 years old increased for all race/ethnicities. For R donors, whites were more frequently older, while Hispanics/Latinos and Asians were younger.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater efforts to convert FT donors less than 20 years into R donors should be undertaken to ensure the continued diversity of the blood supply.
© 2017 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28370164     DOI: 10.1111/trf.14108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  9 in total

1.  Sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics associated with blood donation in the United States: a population-based study.

Authors:  Eshan U Patel; Evan M Bloch; Mary K Grabowski; Ruchika Goel; Parvez M Lokhandwala; Patricia A R Brunker; Jodie L White; Beth Shaz; Paul M Ness; Aaron A R Tobian
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Frequent blood donations alter susceptibility of red blood cells to storage- and stress-induced hemolysis.

Authors:  Tamir Kanias; Mars Stone; Grier P Page; Yuelong Guo; Stacy M Endres-Dighe; Marion C Lanteri; Bryan R Spencer; Ritchard G Cable; Darrell J Triulzi; Joseph E Kiss; Edward L Murphy; Steve Kleinman; Mark T Gladwin; Michael P Busch; Alan E Mast
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Evaluation of matrix effects and prolonged storage on Trypanosoma cruzi serology in blood donor specimens.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Whitman; Rebecca L Townsend; Caryn Bern; Susan L Stramer
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Blood donation for all: inclusivity is important to the blood supply.

Authors:  Meghan Delaney
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  DEL phenotype.

Authors:  Dong H Kwon; S G Sandler; Willy A Flegel
Journal:  Immunohematology       Date:  2017-09

Review 6.  Transfusion Support of Minority Patients: Extended Antigen Donor Typing and Recruitment of Minority Blood Donors.

Authors:  Jenna Khan; Meghan Delaney
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.747

7.  Chagas Disease Serological Test Performance in U.S. Blood Donor Specimens.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Whitman; Christina A Bulman; Emma L Gunderson; Amanda M Irish; Rebecca L Townsend; Susan L Stramer; Judy A Sakanari; Caryn Bern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  COVID-19 convalescent plasma donor characteristics, product disposition, and comparison with standard apheresis donors.

Authors:  Baia Lasky; Erin Goodhue Meyer; Whitney R Steele; Lauren A Crowder; Pampee P Young
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 3.337

9.  Supplemental findings of the 2019 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey.

Authors:  Sanjida J Mowla; Mathew R P Sapiano; Jefferson M Jones; James J Berger; Sridhar V Basavaraju
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.337

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.