Literature DB >> 28369871

Emergency Department Attendance after Telephone Triage: A Population-Based Data Linkage Study.

Amy Gibson1, Deborah Randall1, Duong T Tran1, Mary Byrne2, Anthony Lawler3, Alys Havard1, Maureen Robinson4, Louisa R Jorm1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate compliance with telephone helpline advice to attend an emergency department (ED) and the acuity of patients who presented to ED following a call. DATA SOURCES/COLLECTION
METHODS: In New South Wales (NSW), Australia, 2009-2012, all (1.04 million) calls to a telephone triage service, ED presentations, hospital admissions and death registrations, linked using probabilistic data linkage. STUDY
DESIGN: Population-based, observational cohort study measuring ED presentations within 24 hours of a call in patients (1) with dispositions to attend ED (compliance) and (2) low-urgency dispositions (self-referral), triage categories on ED presentation. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: A total of 66.5 percent of patients were compliant with dispositions to attend an ED. A total of 6.2 percent of patients with low-urgency dispositions self-referred to the ED within 24 hours. After age adjustment, healthdirect compliant patients were significantly less likely (7.8 percent) to receive the least urgent ED triage category compared to the general NSW ED population (16.9 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: This large population-based data linkage study provides precise estimates of ED attendance following calls to a telephone triage service and details the predictors of ED attendance. Patients who attend an ED compliant with a healthdirect helpline disposition are significantly less likely than the general ED population to receive the lowest urgency triage category on arrival. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Administrative data uses; epidemiology; hospitals; referrals, referral networks

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28369871      PMCID: PMC5867179          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  20 in total

1.  Giving emergency advice over the telephone: it can be done safely and consistently.

Authors:  Geoffrey Hughes
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2003-07-11

2.  Parental compliance with after hours telephone triage advice: nurse advice service versus on-call pediatricians.

Authors:  Thomas J Lee; Larry J Baraff; Stephen P Wall; Judith Guzy; David Johnson; Heide Woo
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.168

3.  How safe is triage by an after-hours telephone call center?

Authors:  Allison Kempe; Maya Bunik; Jennifer Ellis; David Magid; Teresa Hegarty; L Miriam Dickinson; John F Steiner
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis.

Authors:  John L Campbell; Emily Fletcher; Nicky Britten; Colin Green; Tim A Holt; Valerie Lattimer; David A Richards; Suzanne H Richards; Chris Salisbury; Raff Calitri; Vicky Bowyer; Katherine Chaplin; Rebecca Kandiyali; Jamie Murdoch; Julia Roscoe; Anna Varley; Fiona C Warren; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A telephone advice line does not decrease the number of presentations to Christchurch Emergency Department, but does decrease the number of phone callers seeking advice.

Authors:  David J Graber; Michael W Ardagh; Paul O'Donovan; Ian St George
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2003-07-11

6.  Medical telephone triage and patient behaviour: How do they compare?

Authors:  Steffan Niemann; Andreas Meer; Christian Simonin; Thomas Abel
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Patient compliance with medical advice given by telephone.

Authors:  José Labarère; Jean-Pierre Torres; Patrice Francois; Magali Fourny; Philippe Argento; Xavier Gensburger; Philippe Menthonnex
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.469

8.  Outcomes of children referred to an emergency department by an after-hours call center.

Authors:  Richard J Scarfone; Anthony A Luberti; Rakesh D Mistry
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.454

9.  Compliance with advice and appropriateness of emergency presentation following contact with the HealthDirect telephone triage service.

Authors:  Peter Sprivulis; Mary Carey; Ian Rouse
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Quantifying the proportion of general practice and low-acuity patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  Yusuf Nagree; Vanessa J Camarda; Daniel M Fatovich; Peter A Cameron; Ian Dey; Andrew D Gosbell; Sally M McCarthy; David Mountain
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 7.738

View more
  3 in total

1.  Internet Hospitals Help Prevent and Control the Epidemic of COVID-19 in China: Multicenter User Profiling Study.

Authors:  Kai Gong; Zhong Xu; Zhefeng Cai; Yuxiu Chen; Zhanxiang Wang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  To what extent do callers follow the advice given by a non-emergency medical helpline (NHS 111): A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mable Angela Nakubulwa; Geva Greenfield; Elena Pizzo; Andreas Magusin; Ian Maconochie; Mitch Blair; Derek Bell; Azeem Majeed; Ganesh Sathyamoorthy; Thomas Woodcock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Compliance with telephone triage advice among adults aged 45 years and older: an Australian data linkage study.

Authors:  Duong Thuy Tran; Amy Gibson; Deborah Randall; Alys Havard; Mary Byrne; Maureen Robinson; Anthony Lawler; Louisa R Jorm
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.