| Literature DB >> 28369461 |
Xuemei Ni1,2, Qiuju Xia1,2, Houbao Zhang1,2, Shu Cheng1,2, Hui Li1,2, Guangyu Fan3, Tao Guo1,2, Ping Huang1,2, Haitao Xiang1,2, Qingchun Chen1,2, Ning Li1,2, Hongfeng Zou1,2,4, Xuemei Cai1,2, Xuejing Lei1,2, Xiaoming Wang3, Chengshu Zhou1,2,5,6,7, Zhihai Zhao3, Gengyun Zhang1,2,5,6,7, Guohua Du4, Wei Cai4, Zhiwu Quan1,2,5,6,7.
Abstract
Foxtail millet (Setaria italica) provides food and fodder in semi-arid regions and infertile land. Resequencing of 184 foxtail millet recombinant inbred lines (RILs) was carried out to aid essential research on foxtail millet improvement. A total 483 414 single nucleotide polymorphisms were determined. Bin maps were constructed based on the RILs' recombination data. Based on the high-density bin map, we updated Zhanggu reference with 416 Mb after adding 16 Mb unanchored scaffolds and Yugu reference with some assembly error correction and 3158 gaps filled. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping of nine agronomic traits was done based on this RIL population, five of which were controlled by a single gene. Meanwhile, two QTLs were found for plant height, and a candidate gene showed 89% identity to the known rice gibberellin-synthesis gene sd1. Three QTLs were found for the trait of heading date. The whole genome resequencing and QTL mapping provided important tools for foxtail millet research and breeding. Resequencing of the RILs could also provide an effective way for high-quality genome assembly and gene identification.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28369461 PMCID: PMC5466707 DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giw005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gigascience ISSN: 2047-217X Impact factor: 6.524
Figure 2.Genetic distance vs. physical distance. Genetic position of the 3437 bins is plotted against the corresponding physical position. Regions with low ratio of genetic distance to physical distance show heterochromatin regions.
Summary of the bins and SNP distribution in Zhanggu
| Chromosome | Length (bp) | Bin number | Linkage (cM) | SNP number | SNP density (/kb) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| chr1 | 44 603 498 | 408 | 167.117 | 42 624 | 0.955 |
| chr2 | 51 761 675 | 491 | 224.647 | 89 674 | 1.732 |
| chr3 | 54 090 027 | 396 | 221.738 | 81 236 | 1.502 |
| chr4 | 43 349 090 | 348 | 168.232 | 27 932 | 0.644 |
| chr5 | 49 560 508 | 480 | 267.52 | 60 305 | 1.217 |
| chr6 | 36 928 436 | 203 | 152.1 | 30 946 | 0.838 |
| chr7 | 37 743 793 | 242 | 168.48 | 56 045 | 1.485 |
| chr8 | 38 066 565 | 283 | 205.431 | 58 149 | 1.528 |
| chr9 | 59 875 680 | 586 | 352.58 | 36 503 | 0.609 |
| Total | 415 979 272 | 3437 | 1927.845 | 483 414 | 1.162 |
Figure 1.Distribution of 483 414 SNPs between Zhanggu and A2.
Summary of Zhanggu second edition and Yugu second edition
| Strain | Chromosome length (bp) | Gap length (bp) | Gap number | Gap ratio | Filled gap number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhanggu | 399 854 594 | 26 817 695 | 31 942 | 6.7% | / |
| Zhanggu2th | 415 979 272 | 28 962 873 | 34 452 | 7.0% | / |
| Yugu | 401 300 876 | 4 616 102 | 6171 | 1.2% | / |
| Yugu2th | 402 520 233 | 2 175 332 | 3297 | 0.5% | 2874 |
Figure 4.Genomic landscape of the Zhanggu chromosomes (second edition). Major DNA components are categorized into genes (brown), DNA transposons (yellow), Copia-like retrotransposons (dark blue), Gypsy-like retrotransposons (light blue), with respective DNA contents of 19%, 13%, 10%, and 21% of the genome sequence. Categories were determined for 1-Mb windows with a 0.2-Mb shift. Recombination ratio was shown in blue bars, ranging from 0 cM/Mb to 30 cM/Mb.
Figure 3.Gap filling in Yugu chromosome. Gap was filled by the Zhanggu sequence when both flank sequences were matched to the Zhanggu chromosome. (a) Gap was caused by low coverage, both flank sequences were matched to the Zhanggu, gap was filled by the lowercase Zhanggu sequence. (b) Gap was caused by ploy G sequence, Sanger sequencing cannot step over the ploy G.
Figure 5.Gene mapping of the largest effect locus of plant height and five qualitative traits in foxtail millet. Genotype of recombination lines are shown in red and green block, “a” in red block means paternal genotype, “b” in green means maternal genotype. Phenotype of recombination lines are shown in the left of genotype blocks. (a) Gene mapping of the largest effect locus of plant height (paternal: tall – maternal: dwarf). (b) Gene mapping of the locus of leaf color (paternal: green – maternal: yellow). (c) Gene mapping of the locus of anther color (paternal: yellow – maternal: brown). (d) Gene mapping of the locus of bristle color (paternal: red – maternal: green). (e) Gene mapping of the locus of sethoxydim resistance (paternal: resistant – maternal: sensitive). (f) Gene mapping of the locus of tassel hardness (paternal: stiff – maternal: flexible).
Figure 6.QTL analysis of five quantitative traits in foxtail millet. Peak signals of 3 years are shown in 3 colors. (a) QTL analysis of plant height. (b) QTL analysis of heading date. (c) QTL analysis of flag leaf length. (d) QTL analysis of flag leaf width. Lines in green means data collected in 2009, lines in red means data collected in 2010, lines in blue means data collected in 2011.