Literature DB >> 28368987

Prevalence and Predictors of Pressure Injuries From Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: Do Body Morphological Changes During Deformity Correction Increase the Risks?

Shuxun Lin1, Hwee Weng Dennis Hey, Eugene Tze Chun Lau, Kimberly-Anne Tan, Joseph Shantakumar Thambiah, Leok-Lim Lau, Naresh Kumar, Ka-Po Gabriel Liu, Hee-Kit Wong.   

Abstract

MINI: Pressure injuries are prevalent in patients undergoing spine surgery while prone. Multiple risk factors exist and should be addressed. We found that patients undergoing spinal deformity correction surgery are at unique risk (odds ratio 3.31, P = 0.010) due to body morphological changes occurring secondary to intraoperative changes in spinal alignment. STUDY
DESIGN: Review of data and prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and predictive factors of pressure injuries in spine surgery performed in the prone position, and to determine whether morphological changes and truncal shifts occurring during deformity correction predispose to this complication. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine surgery performed in the prone position presents the risk of developing pressure injuries. This risk is potentially increased in deformity correction, because it tends to involve more extensive procedures, with associated longer operating times.
METHODS: Cases of pressure injuries after spine surgery in the prone position were reviewed to ascertain prevalence and determine risk factors. Data including patient factors (age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, comorbidities, Braden scale, neurological status, spinal pathology) and surgical factors (approach, procedure type, number of screws, operated levels, operative time) were collected. Independent risk factors were identified via multivariate analysis. A subsequent prospective analysis of all patients undergoing spinal deformity correction was conducted by performing intraoperative measurements of body morphological changes and shifts in truncal positions. Statistical correlation was performed to determine whether positional shifts cause pressure injuries.
RESULTS: The prevalence of pressure injuries was 23.0%. Previous skin problems (P = 0.034), myelopathy (P = 0.013), operative time >300 minutes (P = 0.005), and more than four operated levels (P = 0.006) were independent predictors of pressure injuries. Being a spinal deformity patient was also an independent risk factor for developing pressure injuries (odds ratio 3.31, P = 0.010). Significant changes in body measurements during deformity correction were predictive of pressure injuries.
CONCLUSION: Pressure injuries are prevalent in patients undergoing spine surgery while prone. Future studies should investigate strategies to prevent this complication based on the multiple risk factors identified in the present study. Patients undergoing spinal deformity correction surgery are particularly at risk due to intraoperative body morphological changes. Improved padding methods should be trialed in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28368987     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  3 in total

1.  An Innovative System to Facilitate Extension Osteotomy in the Prone Position for Chin-on-Chest Deformity of Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Authors:  Benjamin Kolb; John Large; Glyn Smurthwaite
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

2.  Incidence of Pressure-Related Skin Injuries in Patients Operated for Spine Surgery in Prone: A Retrospective Analysis of 307 Patients.

Authors:  Parmod Kumar Bithal; Jan Ravees; Ward Vandan Daniel; Eisa Samar; Al Talhi Alaa; Anwar Abdulhamid Yanbawi
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2020-03-16

Review 3.  A prediction tool for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers among surgical patients: Surgical pressure ulcer risk score.

Authors:  Fazila Aloweni; Shin Yuh Ang; Stephanie Fook-Chong; Nurliyana Agus; Patricia Yong; Meh Meh Goh; Lisa Tucker-Kellogg; Rick Chai Soh
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.