Jennifer K Plichta1, Xiang Gao, Huaiying Lin, Qunfeng Dong, Evelyn Toh, David E Nelson, Richard L Gamelli, Elizabeth A Grice, Katherine A Radek. 1. *Burn and Shock Trauma Research Institute, Loyola University Chicago, Health Sciences Campus, Maywood, Illinois†Department of Surgery, Loyola University Chicago, Health Sciences Campus, Maywood, Illinois‡Department of Public Health Sciences, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Health Sciences Campus, Maywood, Illinois§Center for Biomedical Informatics, Loyola University Chicago, Health Sciences Campus, Maywood, Illinois||Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana¶Departments of Dermatology and Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The cutaneous microbiome maintains skin barrier function, regulates inflammation, and stimulates wound-healing responses. Burn injury promotes an excessive activation of the cutaneous and systemic immune response directed against commensal and invading pathogens. Skin grafting is the primary method of reconstructing full-thickness burns, and wound infection continues to be a significant complication. METHODS: In this study, the cutaneous bacterial microbiome was evaluated and subsequently compared to patient outcomes. Three different full-thickness skin specimens were assessed: control skin from non-burned subjects; burn margin from burn patients; and autologous donor skin from the same cohort of burn patients. RESULTS: We observed that skin bacterial community structure of burn patients was significantly altered compared with control patients. We determined that the unburned autologous donor skin from burn patients exhibits a microbiome similar to that of the burn margin, rather than unburned controls, and that changes in the cutaneous microbiome statistically correlate with several post-burn complications. We established that Corynebacterium positively correlated with burn wound infection, while Staphylococcus and Propionibacterium negatively correlated with burn wound infection. Both Corynebacterium and Enterococcus negatively correlated with the development of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies distinct differences in the cutaneous microbiome between burn subjects and unburned controls, and ascertains that select bacterial taxa significantly correlate with several comorbid complications of burn injury. These preliminary data suggest that grafting donor skin exhibiting bacterial dysbiosis may augment infection and/or graft failure and sets the foundation for more in-depth and mechanistic analyses in presumably "healthy" donor skin from patients requiring skin grafting procedures.
INTRODUCTION: The cutaneous microbiome maintains skin barrier function, regulates inflammation, and stimulates wound-healing responses. Burn injury promotes an excessive activation of the cutaneous and systemic immune response directed against commensal and invading pathogens. Skin grafting is the primary method of reconstructing full-thickness burns, and wound infection continues to be a significant complication. METHODS: In this study, the cutaneous bacterial microbiome was evaluated and subsequently compared to patient outcomes. Three different full-thickness skin specimens were assessed: control skin from non-burned subjects; burn margin from burn patients; and autologous donor skin from the same cohort of burn patients. RESULTS: We observed that skin bacterial community structure of burn patients was significantly altered compared with control patients. We determined that the unburned autologous donor skin from burn patients exhibits a microbiome similar to that of the burn margin, rather than unburned controls, and that changes in the cutaneous microbiome statistically correlate with several post-burn complications. We established that Corynebacterium positively correlated with burn wound infection, while Staphylococcus and Propionibacterium negatively correlated with burn wound infection. Both Corynebacterium and Enterococcus negatively correlated with the development of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies distinct differences in the cutaneous microbiome between burn subjects and unburned controls, and ascertains that select bacterial taxa significantly correlate with several comorbid complications of burn injury. These preliminary data suggest that grafting donor skin exhibiting bacterial dysbiosis may augment infection and/or graft failure and sets the foundation for more in-depth and mechanistic analyses in presumably "healthy" donor skin from patients requiring skin grafting procedures.
Authors: Hadas Hawlena; Evelyn Rynkiewicz; Evelyn Toh; Andrew Alfred; Lance A Durden; Michael W Hastriter; David E Nelson; Ruichen Rong; Daniel Munro; Qunfeng Dong; Clay Fuqua; Keith Clay Journal: ISME J Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Evann E Hilt; Kathleen McKinley; Meghan M Pearce; Amy B Rosenfeld; Michael J Zilliox; Elizabeth R Mueller; Linda Brubaker; Xiaowu Gai; Alan J Wolfe; Paul C Schreckenberger Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-12-26 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Jürgen Schauber; Robert A Dorschner; Alvin B Coda; Amanda S Büchau; Philip T Liu; David Kiken; Yolanda R Helfrich; Sewon Kang; Hashem Z Elalieh; Andreas Steinmeyer; Ulrich Zügel; Daniel D Bikle; Robert L Modlin; Richard L Gallo Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2007-02-08 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: David Miñana-Galbis; Dora L Pinzón; J Gaspar Lorén; Àngels Manresa; Rosa M Oliart-Ros Journal: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol Date: 2009-08-21 Impact factor: 2.747
Authors: Brynn A Hollingsworth; David R Cassatt; Andrea L DiCarlo; Carmen I Rios; Merriline M Satyamitra; Thomas A Winters; Lanyn P Taliaferro Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Taylor R Johnson; Belinda I Gómez; Matthew K McIntyre; Michael A Dubick; Robert J Christy; Susannah E Nicholson; David M Burmeister Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Thomas H A Ederveen; Jos P H Smits; Jos Boekhorst; Joost Schalkwijk; Ellen H van den Bogaard; Patrick L J M Zeeuwen Journal: J Dermatol Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 4.005