Literature DB >> 28368528

Interhospital Transfer of Neurosurgical Patients: Implications of Timing on Hospital Course and Clinical Outcomes.

Christopher M Holland1,2, Brendan P Lovasik2, Brian M Howard1,2, Evan W McClure2, Owen B Samuels1,2,3, Daniel L Barrow1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interhospital transfer of neurosurgical patients is common; however, little is known about the impact of transfer parameters on clinical outcomes. Lower survival rates have been reported for patients admitted at night and on weekends in other specialties. Whether time or day of admission affects neurosurgical patient outcomes, specifically those transferred from other facilities, is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of the timing of interhospital transfer on the hospital course and clinical outcomes of neurosurgical patients.
METHODS: All consecutive admissions of patients transferred to our adult neurosurgical service were retrospectively analyzed for a 1-year study period using data from a central transfer database and the electronic health record.
RESULTS: Patients arrived more often at night (70.8%) despite an even distribution of transfer requests. The lack of transfer imaging did not affect length of stay, intervention times, or patient outcomes. Daytime arrivals had shorter total transfer time, but longer intenstive care unit and overall length of stay (8.7 and 11.6 days, respectively), worse modified Rankin Scale scores, lower rates of functional independence, and almost twice the mortality rate. Weekend admissions had significantly worse modified Rankin Scale scores and lower rates of functional independence.
CONCLUSIONS: The timing of transfer arrivals, both by hour or day of the week, is correlated with the time to intervention, hospital course, and overall patient outcomes. Patients admitted during the weekend suffered worse functional outcomes and a trend towards increased mortality. While transfer logistics clearly impact patient outcomes, further work is needed to understand these complex relationships.
Copyright © 2017 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hospital referral; Neurological emergency; Neurosurgery; Resource utilization; Stroke management; Telemedicine; Telemedicine transfer; Transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28368528     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyw124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  4 in total

1.  The Scope and Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Neuroemergent Patient Transfers, Clinical Care and Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Josha Woodward; Samuel Meza; Dominick Richards; Lacin Koro; Kevin C Keegan; Krishna C Joshi; Lorenzo F Munoz; Richard W Byrne; Sayona John
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-09

2.  Comparison between urban and rural mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study in South Korea.

Authors:  Hye Sim Kim; Dae Ryong Kang; Inah Kim; Kyungsuk Lee; Hoon Jo; Sang Baek Koh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Inter-facility transfer of patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and GCS 14-15: The pilot study of a screening protocol by neurosurgeon to avoid unnecessary transfers.

Authors:  Nima Alan; Song Kim; Nitin Agarwal; Jamie Clarke; Donald M Yealy; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; Raymond F Sekula
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Transfer of Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrhage who Need External Ventricular Drain: Does Admission Location Matter?

Authors:  Quincy K Tran; Sagar Dave; Daniel J Haase; Laura Tiffany; Shannon Gaasch; Wan-Tsu W Chang; Kevin Jones; Matthew J Kole; Aaron Wessell; Gary Schwartzbauer; Thomas M Scalea; Jay Menaker
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-01-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.