Ti Yin1,2, Shu-Chen Kuo3, Yea-Yuan Chang4,5,6, Yung-Tai Chen6,7, Kai-Wei Katherine Wang8. 1. Department of Nursing, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei 114, Taiwan. 2. Department of Nursing, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan. 3. National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County 350, Taiwan. 4. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, National Yang Ming University Hospital, Yilan 260, Taiwan. 5. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan. 6. Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan. 7. Department of Nephrology, Taipei City Hospital, Heping Fuyou Branch, Taipei 100, Taiwan. 8. Department of Nursing, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei 252, Taiwan.
Abstract
Objective: The mechanism of the beneficial effect of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs), especially verapamil, on the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been described. This study compared the incidence of T2DM in adults prescribed oral verapamil and propensity score-matched adults prescribed other oral CCBs. Methods: This retrospective population-based cohort study used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from 2000 to 2011. T2DM was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. Results: During follow-up periods of 41,958 and 42,118 person-years, 269 of 4930 patients in the verapamil cohort and 340 of 4930 patients in the matched cohort, respectively, developed T2DM. The incidence rates were 6.41 and 8.07 per 1000 population per year among verapamil and other CCB users, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for T2DM associated with use of verapamil (vs. other CCBs) was 0.80 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68 to 0.94; P = 0.006]. After exclusion of patients followed for <180 days or <365 days (to avoid bias derived from delayed diagnosis), adjusted HRs remained significant [0.79 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.93; P = 0.005) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.91; P = 0.002), respectively]. Only the interaction term for age was significant (P = 0.009). Verapamil had a more prominent effect on patients aged older than 65 years (P < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with no known history of diabetes mellitus, oral verapamil use was associated with a decreased incidence of T2DM compared with other CCBs.
Objective: The mechanism of the beneficial effect of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs), especially verapamil, on the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been described. This study compared the incidence of T2DM in adults prescribed oral verapamil and propensity score-matched adults prescribed other oral CCBs. Methods: This retrospective population-based cohort study used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from 2000 to 2011. T2DM was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. Results: During follow-up periods of 41,958 and 42,118 person-years, 269 of 4930 patients in the verapamil cohort and 340 of 4930 patients in the matched cohort, respectively, developed T2DM. The incidence rates were 6.41 and 8.07 per 1000 population per year among verapamil and other CCB users, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for T2DM associated with use of verapamil (vs. other CCBs) was 0.80 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68 to 0.94; P = 0.006]. After exclusion of patients followed for <180 days or <365 days (to avoid bias derived from delayed diagnosis), adjusted HRs remained significant [0.79 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.93; P = 0.005) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.91; P = 0.002), respectively]. Only the interaction term for age was significant (P = 0.009). Verapamil had a more prominent effect on patients aged older than 65 years (P < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with no known history of diabetes mellitus, oral verapamil use was associated with a decreased incidence of T2DM compared with other CCBs.
Authors: Paul Oranje; Robin Gouka; Lindsey Burggraaff; Mario Vermeer; Clément Chalet; Guus Duchateau; Pieter van der Pijl; Marian Geldof; Niels de Roo; Fenja Clauwaert; Toon Vanpaeschen; Johan Nicolaï; Tom de Bruyn; Pieter Annaert; Adriaan P IJzerman; Gerard J P van Westen Journal: Pharmacol Res Perspect Date: 2019-07-30