| Literature DB >> 28368367 |
Guo-Rong Sun1, Yan-Ping Zhang2, Hong-Chao Lv3, Lin-Yi Zhou4, Hong-Yu Cui5, Yu-Long Gao6, Xiao-le Qi7, Yong-Qiang Wang8, Kai Li9, Li Gao10, Qing Pan11, Xiao-Mei Wang12, Chang-Jun Liu13.
Abstract
Marek's disease (MD) virus (MDV) has been evolving continuously, leading to increasing vaccination failure. Here, the MDV field strain BS/15 was isolated from a severely diseased Chinese chicken flock previously vaccinated with CVI988. To explore the causes of vaccination failure, specific-pathogen free (SPF) chickens vaccinated with CVI988 or 814 and unvaccinated controls were challenged with either BS/15 or the reference strain Md5. Both strains induced MD lesions in unvaccinated chickens with similar mortality rates of 85.7% and 80.0% during the experimental period, respectively. However, unvaccinated chickens inoculated with BS/15 exhibited a higher tumor development rate (64.3% vs. 40.0%), but prolonged survival and diminished immune defects compared to Md5-challenged counterparts. These results suggest that BS/15 and Md5 show a similar virulence but manifest with different pathogenic characteristics. Moreover, the protective indices of CVI988 and 814 were 33.3 and 66.7 for BS/15, and 92.9 and 100 for Md5, respectively, indicating that neither vaccine could provide efficient protection against BS/15. Taken together, these data suggest that MD vaccination failure is probably due to the existence of variant MDV strains with known virulence and unexpected vaccine resistance. Our findings should be helpful for understanding the pathogenicity and evolution of MDV strains prevalent in China.Entities:
Keywords: Marek’s disease virus; evolution; pathogenicity; vaccination failure; vaccine efficacy; virulence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28368367 PMCID: PMC5408677 DOI: 10.3390/v9040071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers for Marek’s disease virus (MDV) strain identification.
| Target | Primer Sequence | Product Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| F: 5′-GGGAAATGACAGGTGAATTGTG-3′ | 1403/1580 a | |
| R: 5′-TAAGGAAAATTTGTTACCCCAG-3′ | ||
| F: 5′-TGCGATGAAAGTGCTATGGAGG-3′ | 316–844 b | |
| R: 5′-GAGAATCCCTATGAGAAAGCGC-3′ |
a Exact size is strain-dependent, based on inclusion of a 177-bp insertion; b Exact size depends on 132-base pair repeat sequence (132bpr) copy number.
Figure 1Detection of Marek’s disease virus (MDV) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). DNA of MDV-infected chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEFs) was used as the template for PCR amplification. (A) PCR amplification of the meq gene of MDV. The PCR products of BS/15 and Md5 were 1403 base pair (bp) long, while those of CVI988 and 814 were 1580 bp, as they have a 177-bp insertion in the meq gene; (B) PCR amplification of the 132bpr of MDV. The PCR product of BS/15 132bpr was 448 bp long with a copy number of 3, while the PCR product length for Md5 was 316 bp with a copy number of 2, CVI988 and 814 showed PCR products 316–844 bp long and contained multiple copies of the 132bpr.
Figure 2Viral plaques of CEF cultures caused by MDV infection, and immunofluorescence assays (IFAs). (A) Viral plaques of CEF cultures caused by MDV BS/15 were evident by light microscopy at 120 h post-inoculation; (B) Specific staining of the viral plaques with an MDV gI-specific monoclonal antibody was observed by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bar: 200 μm.
Marek’s disease (MD) incidence, mortality, and tumor rates in each group at 90 dpc.
| Vaccine | Challenge | MD Incidence | PI | Mortality | Tumor Incidence a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | None | 0/14 (0%) | - | 0/14 (0%) | 0% |
| None | Md5 | 15/15 (100%) | - | 12/15 (80.0%) | 40.0% |
| CVI988 | Md5 | 1/14 (7.1%) | 92.9 | 0/14 (0%) | 0% |
| 814 | Md5 | 0/13 (0%) | 100 | 0/14 (0%) | 0% |
| None | BS/15 | 14/14 (100%) | - | 12/14 (85.7%) | 64.3% |
| CVI988 | BS/15 | 10/15 (66.7%) | 33.3 | 8/15 (53.3%) | 13.3% |
| 814 | BS/15 | 5/15 (33.3%) | 66.7 | 5/15 (33.3%) | 20.0% |
PI, protective index; a Percent of birds that developed tumors; dpc, days post-challenge.
Figure 3Survival curves for each group. The survival patterns between the BS/15-challenged group and Md5-challenged control group showed significant differences (p < 0.05) by Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.
Figure 4Body weights and ratios of immune organ weight/body weight in the surviving chickens of each group. The data are shown as mean with SD (n = 2 in the BS/15-challenged group, and n = 3 in the Md5-challenged control group, whereas n = 5 in the other groups), and differences were considered to be statistically significant at p < 0.05 (*). (A) Body weights of the surviving chickens in each group; (B) Ratios of bursa weight/body weight in the surviving chickens of each group; (C) Ratios of thymus weight/body weight in the surviving chickens of each group; (D) Ratios of spleen weight/body weight in the surviving chickens of each group.
Figure 5Normalized viral loads in the feather pulps of five birds from the various treatment groups at different time points (n = 2 in the BS/15-challenged group, and n = 3 in the Md5-challenged control group at 90 days post challenge; dpc). Normalized viral loads were calculated as the logarithm of the MDV copy numbers per million cells.