| Literature DB >> 28368315 |
Yun Zheng1, Zihao Yu2, Feng Lin3, Fangsong Guo4, Khalid A Alamry5, Layla A Taib6, Abdullah M Asiri7,8, Xinchen Wang9.
Abstract
As a promising conjugated polymer, binEntities:
Keywords: Cr(VI) reduction; carbon nitride; photocatalysis; pollutant degradation; self-assembly
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28368315 PMCID: PMC6154601 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22040572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of the formation process of TM-CNx.
Figure 1(a) XRD patterns and (b) FT-IR spectra of trithiocyanuric acid, melamine and TM.
Figure 2SEM images of (a,b) TM, (c,d) TM-CN550, (e,f) TM-CN650 and (g,h) bulk g-C3N4.
Figure 3(a,b) TEM images and (c–f) elemental mapping images of TM-CN650.
Figure 4(a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms, (b) XRD patterns, (c) FT-IR spectra and (d) Raman spectra of TM-CNx and bulk g-C3N4.
The surface area, pore volume, and elemental composition of TM-CNx samples.
| Entry | Samples | Surface Area | Pore Volume | C (wt. %) | N (wt. %) | H (wt. %) | S (wt. %) | Molar ratio C/N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bulk g-C3N4 | 3 | 0.01 | 34.1 | 58.6 | 2.0 | - | 0.68 |
| 2 | TM-CN450 | 8 | 0.01 | 32.1 | 56.4 | 2.3 | <0.5 | 0.66 |
| 3 | TM-CN500 | 9 | 0.01 | 33.1 | 57.3 | 2.1 | <0.5 | 0.67 |
| 4 | TM-CN550 | 17 | 0.01 | 33.4 | 57.1 | 2.3 | <0.5 | 0.68 |
| 5 | TM-CN600 | 35 | 0.04 | 32.8 | 55.6 | 2.2 | <0.5 | 0.69 |
| 6 | TM-CN650 | 72 | 0.06 | 32.8 | 55.8 | 2.2 | <0.5 | 0.69 |
Figure 5(a) XPS survey spectra, (b) C 1s spectra, (c) N 1s spectra, (d) S 2p spectra, (e) VB XPS spectra of TM-CN650.
Figure 6(a) UV-Vis DRS spectra and (b) PL spectra of TM-CNx samples.
The absorption band edge, band gap energy, and photocatalytic activity of TM-CNx samples.
| Entry | Samples | Absorption Band Edge (nm) | Band Gap Energy (eV) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bulk g-C3N4 | 460 | 2.70 | 0.0152 | 0.0036 |
| 2 | TM-CN450 | 442 | 2.81 | 0.0047 | 0.0020 |
| 3 | TM-CN500 | 452 | 2.74 | 0.0352 | 0.0066 |
| 4 | TM-CN550 | 456 | 2.72 | 0.0496 | 0.0181 |
| 5 | TM-CN600 | 463 | 2.68 | 0.1031 | 0.0204 |
| 6 | TM-CN650 | 680 | 1.82 | 0.2283 | 0.1287 |
Figure 7(a,b) Concentration changes of RhB as a function of irradiation time with different catalyst under visible light irradiation; (c) first-order rate constant k (min−1) of TM-CNx; (d) effect of quencher additive and N2 purging on the photocatalytic activity of TM-CN650 in RhB degradation. DMPO spin-trapping EPR spectra of TM-CN650 sample with visible light irradiation (λ > 400 nm) for the detection of (e) DMPO-·O2− and (f) DMPO-·OH.
Figure 8(a) cycling runs of RhB degradation in TM-CNx under visible light irradiation; (b) XRD patterns, (c) FT-IR spectra, and (d) Raman spectra of TM-CN650 and recycled TM-CN650 after photocatalytic degradation.
Figure 9(a) concentration changes of Cr(VI) as a function of irradiation time with different catalyst under visible light irradiation; (b) first-order rate constant k (min−1) of TM-CNx in photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI); (c) control experiments of photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI); and (d) the reusability of TM-CN650 for the reduction of Cr(VI) after 40 min of irradiation.
Figure 10Schematic illustration of the mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of RhB and reduction of Cr(VI) over TM-CN650.