| Literature DB >> 28368305 |
Dianny Silva Lisboa1, Cledir Santos2, Renan N Barbosa3, Oliane Magalhães4, Laura M Paiva5, Keila A Moreira6, Nelson Lima7, Cristina M Souza-Motta8.
Abstract
Water contamination with large amounts of industrial textile coloured effluents is an environmental concern. For the treatment of textile effluents, white-rot fungi have received extensive attention due to their powerful capability to produce oxidative (e.g., ligninolytic) enzymes. In addition, other groups of fungi, such as species of Aspergillus and Trichoderma, have also been used for textile effluents treatment. The main aim of the present study was to requalify a Brazilian Trichoderma culture collection of 51 Trichoderma strains, isolated from different sources in Brazil and preserved in the oldest Latin-American Fungal Service Culture Collection, The Micoteca URM WDCM 804 (Recife, Brazil). Fungal isolates were re-identified through a polyphasic approach including macro- and micro-morphology and molecular biology, and screened for their capability to decolourise real effluents collected directly from storage tanks of a textile manufacture. Trichoderma atroviride URM 4950 presented the best performance on the dye decolourisation in real textile effluent and can be considered in a scale-up process at industrial level. Overall, the potential of Trichoderma strains in decolourising real textile dye present in textile effluent and the production of the oxidative enzymes Lac, LiP and MnP was demonstrated. Fungal strains are available in the collection e-catalogue to be further explored from the biotechnological point of view.Entities:
Keywords: Trichoderma identification; culture collection; filamentous fungi; laccase; lignin peroxidase; manganese peroxidase; textile effluent decolourisation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28368305 PMCID: PMC5409574 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14040373
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Morphological traits of 51 Trichoderma strains from Micoteca URM culture collection.
| URM | Conidia | Phialide | Sterile Hyphae | Chlamyd. | PDA (mm) | SNA (mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shape 1 | Ornament 2 | Colour 3 | Length (μm) | Width (μm) | Length (μm) | Base Width (μm) | 30 °C | 35 °C | 40 °C | 35 °C | |||
| 3280 | GL/SGL | SW | G | 2.8–3.4 | 2.2–2.7 | 10.2–11.9 | 1.8–2.0 | − | + | 67.0 | 9.0 | Ø | 7.0 |
| 6239 | GL/SGL | SW | G | 2.8–3.4 | 3.2–3.6 | 8.5–10.2 | 1.8–2.0 | − | − | 77.0 | 24.0 | Ø | 16.0 |
| 3086 | GL/SGL | SW | G | 2.8–3.4 | 2.2–2.7 | 10.2–11.9 | 1.8–2.0 | − | + | 51.0 | 31.0 | Ø | 23.0 |
| 3487 | GL/SGL | SW | G | 2.8–3.4 | 2.2–2.7 | 10.2–11.9 | 1.8–2.0 | − | + | 74.0 | 28.0 | Ø | 24.0 |
| 3271 | GL/SGL | SW | G | 2.8–3.4 | 3.2–3.6 | 8.5–10.2 | 1.8–2.0 | − | − | 65.0 | 26.0 | Ø | 15.0 |
| 5007 | SGL/O | SW | G | 2.8–3.4 | 2.7–3.2 | 8.5–10.2 | 2.0–2.6 | − | − | 78.0 | 44.0 | Ø | 23.0 |
| 4358 | GL/SGL | SW | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.2–2.7 | 10.2–11.9 | 1.8–2.0 | − | + | 76.0 | 25.0 | Ø | 20.0 |
| 3934 | GL/SGL | SW | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.2–2.7 | 10.2–11.9 | 1.8–2.0 | − | + | 75.0 | 23.0 | Ø | 21.0 |
| 3343 | GL/SGL | SW | G | 2.8–3.4 | 2.2–2.7 | 8.5–10.2 | 2.0–2.6 | − | − | 73.0 | 14.0 | Ø | 6.0 |
| 6656 | SGL/O | SW | G | 2.8–3.4 | 2.2–2.7 | 8.5–10.2 | 2.0–2.6 | − | + | 77.0 | 22.0 | Ø | 18.0 |
| 4926 | GL/SGL | SW | G | 2.8–3.4 | 3.2–3.6 | 8.5–10.2 | 1.8–2.0 | + | + | 71.0 | 32.0 | Ø | 27.0 |
| 3197 | SGL/O | SW | G | 2.8–3.4 | 2.2–2.7 | 10.2–11.9 | 2.6–3.1 | − | + | 52.0 | 24.0 | Ø | 18.0 |
| 3735 | GL/SGL | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 8.5–10.2 | 2.6–3.1 | − | − | 44.0 | Ø | Ø | Ø |
| 3734 | GL/SGL | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 8.5–10.2 | 2.6–3.1 | − | − | 71.0 | Ø | Ø | Ø |
| 6625 | GL/SGL | S | G | 2.8–3.4 | 2.7–3.2 | 8.5–10.2 | 1.8–2.0 | − | − | 69.0 | Ø | Ø | Ø |
| 4950 | GL/SGL | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 8.5–10.2 | 2.6–3.1 | − | − | 77.0 | Ø | Ø | Ø |
| 3601 | GL/SGL | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 8.5–10.2 | 2.6–3.1 | − | − | 80.0 | Ø | Ø | Ø |
| 3270 | GL/SGL | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 8.5–10.2 | 2.6–3.1 | − | − | 40.0 | Ø | Ø | Ø |
| 4162 | E | S | G | 4.2–4.8 | 2.7–3.2 | 6.8–8.5 | 1.8–2.0 | − | + | 73.0 | 20.0 | Ø | 17.0 |
| 4172 | E | S | G | 4.2–4.8 | 3.2–3.6 | 6.8–8.5 | 1.8–2.0 | − | + | 46.0 | 9.0 | Ø | 8.0 |
| 3881 | E | S | G | 4.2–4.8 | 3.2–3.6 | 6.8–8.5 | 1.8–2.0 | − | + | 50.0 | 14.0 | Ø | 11.0 |
| 3732 | E | S | G | 4.9–5.5 | 2.7–3.2 | 5.1–6.8 | 2.0–2.6 | − | − | 75.0 | 75.0 | 56.0 | 77.0 |
| 3341 | SGL/O | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 10.2–11.9 | 2.0–2.6 | + | + | 54.0 | Ø | Ø | Ø |
| 3476 | SGL/O | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 10.2–11.9 | 2.0–2.6 | + | + | 63.0 | Ø | Ø | Ø |
| 3492 | SGL/O | S | G | 2.8–3.4 | 2.7–3.2 | 10.2–11.9 | 1.8–2.0 | + | + | 64.0 | 25.0 | Ø | 9.0 |
| 4722 | SGL/O | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 10.2–11.9 | 2.0–2.6 | + | + | 42.0 | Ø | Ø | Ø |
| 5351 | SGL/O | S | G | 2.4–2.7 | 1.8–2.2 | 8.5–10.2 | 1.8–2.0 | + | + | 75.0 | 35.0 | Ø | 36.0 |
| 6668 | SGL/O | S | G | 2.8–3.4 | 2.2–2.7 | 6.8–8.5 | 1.8–2.0 | − | + | 79.0 | 44.0 | Ø | 38.0 |
| 3935 | SGL/O | S | G | 2.4–2.7 | 1.8–2.2 | 10.2–11.9 | 2.0–2.6 | − | − | 58.0 | 20.0 | Ø | 14.0 |
| 5574 | SGL/O | S | G | 2.8–3.4 | 1.8–2.2 | 6.8–8.5 | 1.8–2.0 | + | − | 65.0 | 7.0 | Ø | 6.0 |
| 4463 | SGL/O | S | G | 2.8–3.4 | 1.8–2.2 | 8.5–10.2 | 1.8–2.0 | − | − | 78.0 | 29.0 | Ø | 29.0 |
| 2842 | SGL/O | S | G | 2.8–3.4 | 2.2–2.7 | 10.2–11.9 | 2.0–2.6 | − | − | 71.0 | 13.0 | Ø | 10.0 |
| 6669 | SGL/O | S | G | 2.4–2.7 | 1.8–2.2 | 10.2–11.9 | 2.0–2.6 | − | − | 58.0 | 17.0 | Ø | 12.0 |
| 4475 | SGL/O | S | G | 2.4–2.7 | 1.8–2.2 | 10.2–11.9 | 2.0–2.6 | − | − | 68.0 | 17.0 | Ø | 13.0 |
| 5482 | SGL/O | S | G | 2.4–2.7 | 1.8–2.2 | 10.2–11.9 | 2.0–2.6 | − | − | 57.0 | 31.0 | Ø | 28.0 |
| 4720 | GL/SGL | S | G | 2.4–2.7 | 2.2–2.7 | 8.5–10.2 | 2.0–2.6 | − | − | 64.0 | 15.0 | Ø | 11.0 |
| 6266 | SGL/O | S | G | 2.4–2.7 | 1.8–2.2 | 5.1–6.8 | 1.8–2.0 | − | + | 79.0 | 28.0 | Ø | 11.0 |
| 4328 | SGL/O | S | G | 2.4–2.7 | 1.8–2.2 | 10.2–11.9 | 2.0–2.6 | − | − | 50.0 | 8.0 | Ø | 8.0 |
| 2820 | SGL/O | S | G | 2.8–3.4 | 1.8–2.2 | 6.8–8.5 | 2.0–2.6 | − | − | 74.0 | 23.0 | Ø | 19.0 |
| 3606 | GL/SGL | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 13.6–15.2 | 2.0–2.6 | − | − | 54.0 | 12.0 | Ø | 3.0 |
| 4723 | E | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 1.8–2.2 | 6.8–8.5 | 1.8–2.0 | − | − | 76.0 | 8.0 | Ø | 15.0 |
| 4745 | E | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 1.8–2.2 | 6.8–8.5 | 1.8–2.0 | − | − | 74.0 | 10.0 | Ø | 17.0 |
| 3880 | E | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 1.8–2.2 | 6.8–8.5 | 1.8–2.0 | − | − | 72.0 | 11.0 | Ø | 13.0 |
| 5158 | E | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.2–2.7 | 10.2–11.9 | 2.6–3.1 | − | + | 83.0 | 83.0 | 31.0 | 80.0 |
| 3276 | OB | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 5.1–6.8 | 2.6–3.1 | + | + | 67.0 | 9.0 | Ø | Ø |
| 5629 | SGL/O | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.2–2.7 | 13.6–15.2 | 1.8–2.0 | − | + | 56.0 | 28.0 | Ø | 27.0 |
| 4210 | SGL/O | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 13.6–15.2 | 2.0–2.6 | − | − | 82.0 | 27.0 | Ø | 24.0 |
| 4466 | GL/SGL | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 10.2–11.9 | 2.0–2.6 | − | + | 53.0 | 21.0 | Ø | 20.0 |
| 4951 | GL/SGL | S | G | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 10.2–11.9 | 2.0–2.6 | + | + | 66.0 | 43.0 | Ø | 16.0 |
| 4996 | GL/SGL | S | G | 4.2–4.8 | 3.2–3.6 | 8.5–10.2 | 2.6–3.1 | − | + | 69.0 | 35.0 | Ø | 25.0 |
| 2596 | SGL/O | S | W/Y | 3.5–4.1 | 2.7–3.2 | 13.6–15.2 | 2.6–3.1 | − | + | 73.0 | 28.0 | Ø | 28.0 |
1 E, Ellipsoidal; GL, Globose; SGL, Subglobose; O, Ovoid; OB, Oblong. 2 S, Smooth; SW, Slightly Warty. 3 G, Green; W/Y, White to Yellow. Symbols: −, Absent; +, Present; Ø, Without growth.
Figure 1Dendrogram using the hierarchical cluster analysis (average linkage between groups) of relatedness among the strains of Trichoderma based on the morphological analysis data in Table 1.
Figure 2Molecular phylogenetic analysis of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 for Trichoderma strains by maximum likelihood method. Indicated phylogenetic relationships were inferred with the maximum likelihood method based on the Kimura-2 parameter substitution model and 1000 bootstrap replicates conducted in MEGA5. Only those values with greater than 50% confidence are shown. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site. Hypomyces subiculosus (EU280093 ITS sequence) was used as out group.
Figure 3Molecular phylogenetic analysis of tef1 for Trichoderma strains by maximum likelihood method. Indicated phylogenetic relationships were inferred with the maximum likelihood method based on the Kimura-2 parameter substitution model and 1000 bootstrap replicates conducted in MEGA5. Only those values with greater than 50% confidence are shown. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site. Hypomyces subiculosus (FN868770 tef1 sequence) was used as out group.
Re-identification of bio-resources from Micoteca URM culture collections after morphological and molecular characterisation.
| URM | Revised Identification | Original Identification | Deposit Year | Substrate | Geographical Origin (Brazil) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3280 | 1992 | Soil | Paraná | ||
| 6239 | 2010 | Soil | Pernambuco | ||
| 3086 | 1989 | Leaf of | São Paulo | ||
| 3487 | 1994 | Birds faeces | Pernambuco | ||
| 3271 | 1992 | Unknown | São Paulo | ||
| 5007 | 2005 | Soil | Pernambuco | ||
| 4358 | 2001 | Soil | Pernambuco | ||
| 3934 | 1997 | Water | Pernambuco | ||
| 3343 | 1993 | Unknown | Pernambuco | ||
| 6656 | 2012 | Soil with textile effluent | Pernambuco | ||
| 4926 | 2005 | Clay soil | Pernambuco | ||
| 3197 | 1990 | Amazonian nuts | Pará | ||
| 3735 | 1997 | Lake water | Pernambuco | ||
| 3734 | 1997 | Lake water | Pernambuco | ||
| 6625 | 2012 | Soil of agroforestry | Pernambuco | ||
| 4950 | 2005 | Soil | Pernambuco | ||
| 3601 | 1995 | Unknown | Paraná | ||
| 3270 | 1992 | Unknown | São Paulo | ||
| 4162 | 1999 | Rhizosphere of sunflower | Pernambuco | ||
| 4172 | 1999 | Rhizosphere of sunflower | Pernambuco | ||
| 3881 | 1997 | Soil of | Pernambuco | ||
| 3732 | 1997 | Lake water | Pernambuco | ||
| 3341 | 1992 | Rhizosphere of | São Paulo | ||
| 3476 | 1993 | Rhizosphere of | São Paulo | ||
| 3492 | 1994 | Birds faeces | Pernambuco | ||
| 4722 | 2003 | Garden of | Alagoas | ||
| 5351 | 2006 | Sugarcane | Unknown | ||
| 6668 | 2012 | Soil with textile effluent | Pernambuco | ||
| 3935 | 1997 | River water | Pernambuco | ||
| 5574 | 2007 | Mangrove sediment | Pernambuco | ||
| 4463 | 2002 | Sea water | Pernambuco | ||
| 2842 | 1986 | Unknown | Pernambuco | ||
| 6669 | 2012 | Soil with textile effluent | Pernambuco | ||
| 4475 | 2002 | Beach sand | Pernambuco | ||
| 5482 | 2007 | Unknown | São Paulo | ||
| 4720 | 2003 | Garden of | Alagoas | ||
| 6266 | 2010 | Soil of agroforestry | Pernambuco | ||
| 4328 | 2001 | Soil of mining | Bahia | ||
| 2820 | 1985 | Sugarcane bagasse | Alagoas | ||
| 3606 | 1995 | Unknown | Paraná | ||
| 4723 | 2003 | Garden of | Alagoas | ||
| 4745 | 2003 | Garden of | Alagoas | ||
| 3880 | 1997 | Soil of | Pernambuco | ||
| 5158 | 2005 | Cement | Pernambuco | ||
| 3276 | 1991 | sorghum | Pernambuco | ||
| 5629 | ---- | Unknown | Paraná | ||
| 4210 | 1999 | Rhizosphere of sunflower | Pernambuco | ||
| 4466 | 2002 | Sea water | Pernambuco | ||
| 4951 | 2005 | Soil | Pernambuco | ||
| 4996 | 2005 | Soil | Pernambuco | ||
| 2596 | 1980 | Unknown | Pernambuco |
The 18 Trichoderma URM strains that presented decolourisation percentages of Indigo Carmine above 70% and related oxidase enzyme activities (U·L−1) after eight days of incubation.
| Species | URM | Lac | LiP | MnP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3280 | 1.7 aC | 760.0 cdA | 379.3 defB | |
| 4926 | 8.3 aC | 517.3 fghA | 366.0 defgB | |
| 3270 | 2.0 aC | 758.0 cdA | 394.0 defB | |
| 3735 | 8.3 aC | 1307.0 aA | 617.3 bcB | |
| 4950 | 2.3 aB | 750.0 cdA | 680.0 bA | |
| 6625 | 1.3 aB | 692.0 deA | 90.7 jlB | |
| 3881 | 10.0 aC | 378.7 iB | 875.3 aA | |
| 3732 | 1.7 aC | 766.3 cdA | 298.0 fghB | |
| 3476 | 1.0 aC | 593.3 efgA | 92.7 jlB | |
| 2842 | 2.3 aC | 924.0 bA | 176.0 hijB | |
| 3935 | 1.3 aC | 480.0 ghiA | 143.3 ijB | |
| 4328 | 2.7 aB | 378.0 iA | 442.7 deA | |
| 4463 | 1.7 aC | 758.7 cdA | 232.0 ghiB | |
| 5482 | 2.7 aC | 631.3 defA | 369.3 defB | |
| 6668 | 3.0 aB | 440.0 hiA | 0.0 lB | |
| 3880 | 7.7 aC | 645.3 defA | 146.0 ijB | |
| 4996 | 15.7 aC | 844.0 bcA | 329.3 efgB | |
| 5629 | 1.7 aC | 612.7 efgA | 500.0 cdB |
Averages values followed by the same superscript letters, lower case (within column) and capital (within row), do not differ by Tukey test at 5% probability.
Physical-chemical analyses of the effluent obtained from the textile manufacture located at the municipality of Toritama, Pernambuco, Brazil.
| COD (mg O2·L−1) | BOD (mg O2·L−1) | Colour (HAZEN) | Turbidity (NTU) | pH | SD (mL·L−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3192.5 | 54.1 | 448.0 | 0.19 | 5.11 | 7.0 |
Figure 4Decolourisation percentage of real textile effluent by the six Trichoderma strains best oxidases producers. Averages followed by the same letters do not differ by Friedman test at 5% probability.