Literature DB >> 28368190

Failure to pop out: Feature singletons do not capture attention under low signal-to-noise ratio conditions.

Dragan Rangelov1, Hermann J Müller2, Michael Zehetleitner3.   

Abstract

Pop-out search implies that the target is always the first item selected, no matter how many distractors are presented. However, increasing evidence indicates that search is not entirely independent of display density even for pop-out targets: search is slower with sparse (few distractors) than with dense displays (many distractors). Despite its significance, the cause of this anomaly remains unclear. We investigated several mechanisms that could slow down search for pop-out targets. Consistent with the assumption that pop-out targets frequently fail to pop out in sparse displays, we observed greater variability of search duration for sparse displays relative to dense. Computational modeling of the response time distributions also supported the view that pop-out targets fail to pop out in sparse displays. Our findings strongly question the classical assumption that early processing of pop-out targets is independent of the distractors. Rather, the density of distractors critically influences whether or not a stimulus pops out. These results call for new, more reliable measures of pop-out search and potentially a reinterpretation of studies that used relatively sparse displays. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28368190     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  4 in total

1.  Hidden from view: Statistical learning exposes latent attentional capture.

Authors:  Matthew D Hilchey; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

2.  Inter-trial effects in visual pop-out search: Factorial comparison of Bayesian updating models.

Authors:  Fredrik Allenmark; Hermann J Müller; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Jiaqing Chen; Jagjot Kaur; Hana Abbas; Ming Wu; Wenyi Luo; Sinan Osman; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models.

Authors:  Fredrik Allenmark; Ahu Gokce; Thomas Geyer; Artyom Zinchenko; Hermann J Müller; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 4.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.