Literature DB >> 28368188

An easy game for frauds? Effects of professional experience and time pressure on passport-matching performance.

Benedikt Emanuel Wirth1, Claus-Christian Carbon2.   

Abstract

Despite extensive research on unfamiliar face matching, little is known about factors that might affect matching performance in real-life scenarios. We conducted 2 experiments to investigate the effects of several such factors on unfamiliar face-matching performance in a passport-check scenario. In Experiment 1, we assessed the effect of professional experience on passport-matching performance. The matching performance of 96 German Federal Police officers working at Munich Airport was compared with that of 48 novices without specific face-matching experience. Police officers significantly outperformed novices, but nevertheless missed a high ratio of frauds. Moreover, the effects of manipulating specific facial features (with paraphernalia like glasses and jewelry, distinctive features like moles and scars, and hairstyle) and of variations in the physical distance between the faces being matched were investigated. Whereas manipulation of physical distance did not have a significant effect, manipulations of facial features impaired matching performance. In Experiment 2, passport-matching performance was assessed in relation to time constraints. Novices matched passports either without time constraints, or under a local time limit (which is typically used in laboratory studies), or under a global time limit (which usually occurs during real-life border controls). Time pressure (especially the global time limit) significantly impaired matching performance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28368188     DOI: 10.1037/xap0000114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  9 in total

1.  Feature-by-feature comparison and holistic processing in unfamiliar face matching.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Improving face identification with specialist teams.

Authors:  Tarryn Balsdon; Stephanie Summersby; Richard I Kemp; David White
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27

3.  Use-inspired basic research on individual differences in face identification: implications for criminal investigation and security.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Vicki Bruce; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27

4.  Human-Computer Interaction in Face Matching.

Authors:  Matthew C Fysh; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-06-28

5.  Do professional facial image comparison training courses work?

Authors:  Alice Towler; Richard I Kemp; A Mike Burton; James D Dunn; Tanya Wayne; Reuben Moreton; David White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Super-recognizers: From the lab to the world and back again.

Authors:  Meike Ramon; Anna K Bobak; David White
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2019-03-20

7.  Measurement of individual differences in face-identity processing abilities in older adults.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Bozana Meinhardt-Injac
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-07-18

8.  Face processing in police service: the relationship between laboratory-based assessment of face processing abilities and performance in a real-world identity matching task.

Authors:  Markus M Thielgen; Stefan Schade; Carolin Bosé
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-08-05

9.  Feature instructions improve face-matching accuracy.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.