| Literature DB >> 28368012 |
Kengyeh K Chu1,2, Mark E Kusek3,4, Linbo Liu1,2, Avira Som2,4, Lael M Yonker3,4, Huimin Leung1,2, Dongyao Cui1,2, Jinhyeob Ryu2, Alexander D Eaton4, Guillermo J Tearney1,2,5, Bryan P Hurley3,4.
Abstract
A model of neutrophil migration across epithelia is desirable to interrogate the underlying mechanisms of neutrophilic breach of mucosal barriers. A co-culture system consisting of a polarized mucosal epithelium and human neutrophils can provide a versatile model of trans-epithelial migration in vitro, but observations are typically limited to quantification of migrated neutrophils by myeloperoxidase correlation, a destructive assay that precludes direct longitudinal study. Our laboratory has recently developed a new isotropic 1-μm resolution optical imaging technique termed micro-optical coherence tomography (μOCT) that enables 4D (x,y,z,t) visualization of neutrophils in the co-culture environment. By applying μOCT to the trans-epithelial migration model, we can robustly monitor the spatial distribution as well as the quantity of neutrophils chemotactically crossing the epithelial boundary over time. Here, we demonstrate the imaging and quantitative migration results of our system as applied to neutrophils migrating across intestinal epithelia in response to a chemoattractant. We also demonstrate that perturbation of a key molecular event known to be critical for effective neutrophil trans-epithelial migration (CD18 engagement) substantially impacts this process both qualitatively and quantitatively.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28368012 PMCID: PMC5377939 DOI: 10.1038/srep45789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1μOCT images of T84 epithelium.
(A) XZ cross-sections. The monolayer (larger blue double sided arrow) is cultured upon a porous Transwell filter (smaller blue double sided arrow). Notable features include apical protrusions (white arrows) and brightly reflective apical surface (blue boxes). (B) 3D rendering showing apical epithelium.
Figure 2μOCT cross-sectional XZ (top) and en-face XY (bottom) views of T84 epithelium immediately prior to (left) and 2 hours after the application of EDTA (right).
Figure 3Time-lapse of μOCT cross-sectional XZ images of neutrophils traversing a T84 monolayer in response to fMLP chemoattractant added to the apical compartment.
In the initial frame, neutrophils placed in the basolateral compartment are settling with gravity towards the Transwell membrane. At 30 minutes, neutrophils can be seen entering the epithelium and beginning to protrude into the apical medium. Thereafter, clusters of neutrophils can be seen protruding from the membrane. Scale bars: 50 μm. Full movie data available as Video 4.
Figure 4Results from μOCT time lapse of neutrophil migration through T84 epithelium driven by fMLP chemoattractant.
(A) and (B) Initial and final 3D renderings of 1 mm region during migration (room temperature). Neutrophils (red arrows) added to the basolateral side of the Transwell (yellow arrows) and epithelial barrier (green arrows) at time 0 penetrate the epithelium in discrete clusters (blue arrows) over a 2 hour imaging period. A fraction of the neutrophils detach from the clusters and fall to the glass surface (violet arrows). See Video 5 for a complete time lapse at 10-minute intervals. (C–F) Comparison of quantitative migration results obtained by μOCT image analysis and myeloperixodase (MPO) assay; migration across T84 monolayers in response to fMLP. μOCT results include negative control (HBSS only). Error bars in all cases represent SEM, and PMN totals were scaled to represent the area of an entire Transwell filter. (C) and (D) Number of PMNs attached to epithelium as measured by μOCT and MPO respectively. (E) and F) Number of PMNs detached from epithelium as measured by μOCT and MPO respectively.
Figure 5μOCT renderings of neutrophil migration through T84 in response to fMLP gradient.
Time lapse through 2 hours. Left: Neutrophils pretreated with anti-CD18 antibody. Right: Neutrophils pretreated with isotype control (IgG1). IgG1-treated neutrophils detach readily after migration and aggregate at the slide chamber bottom (red arrow). Anti-CD18 treated neutrophils remain largely attached in clusters at the end of the experiment window (blue arrow).
Figure 6Time profile of neutrophil migration quantity across T84, measured by μOCT, anti-CD18 treated vs. IgG1 control.
(A) Migration density of neutrophils detected within approximately 60 μm of epithelium. (B) Migration density of neutrophils detected not within 60 μm of epithelium. (C) Total migration density of neutrophils. (D) Ratio of neutrophils detected within 60 μm of epithelium to total neutrophils detected. E: Mean migration distance of neutrophils. All panels: Time points with significant differences between treatments denoted by *(p < 0.05) or **(p < 0.01).