| Literature DB >> 28367956 |
Joana Vieira Silva1, Daniel Cruz1, Mariana Gomes1, Bárbara Regadas Correia1, Maria João Freitas1, Luís Sousa1, Vladimiro Silva2, Margarida Fardilha1.
Abstract
Many studies have reported a negative impact of lifestyle factors on testicular function, spermatozoa parameters and pituitary-gonadal axis. However, conclusions are difficult to draw, since studies in the general population are rare. In this study we intended to address the early and late short-term impact of acute lifestyle alterations on young men's reproductive function. Thirty-six healthy male students, who attended the Portuguese academic festivities, provided semen samples and answered questionnaires at three time-points. The consumption of alcohol and cigarette increased more than 8 and 2 times, respectively, during the academic festivities and resulted in deleterious effects on semen quality: one week after the festivities, a decrease on semen volume, spermatozoa motility and normal morphology was observed, in parallel with an increase on immotile spermatozoa, head and midpiece defects and spermatozoa oxidative stress. Additionally, three months after the academic festivities, besides the detrimental effect on volume, motility and morphology, a negative impact on spermatozoa concentration was observed, along with a decrease on epididymal, seminal vesicles and prostate function. This study contributed to understanding the pathophysiology underlying semen quality degradation induced by acute lifestyle alterations, suggesting that high alcohol and cigarette consumption are associated with decreased semen quality in healthy young men.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28367956 PMCID: PMC5377370 DOI: 10.1038/srep45457
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Study design and main outcome measures.
Unmeasured confounders occurring during the academic festivities include factors such as diet and circadian rhythm alterations. TP, time-points.
Descriptive analyses of questionaries’ data, basic semen parameters, oxidative stress markers, and epididymal and accessory sex glands function markers at the different time points (TP).
| N | TP1 | TP2 | TP3 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | SD | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | SD | Minimum | Maximum | ||
| Alcohol consumption (g) | 36 | 15.2 | 32.2 | 0.0 | 179.2 | 123.0 | 130.5 | 0.0 | 480.0 | 18.4 | 24.4 | 0.0 | 96.0 |
| Nicotine consumption (mg) | 36 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 8.4 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 14.4 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 12.0 |
| Age (years) | 36 | 22 | 3 | 18 | 32 | ||||||||
| Sexual abstinence (days) | 32 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 20 |
| Volume (mL) | 36 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 9.0 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 6.0 |
| Concentration (x106/mL) | 36 | 61 | 37 | 20 | 155 | 53 | 39 | 7 | 194 | 49 | 41 | 10 | 241 |
| Total number spermatozoa (x106) | 36 | 236 | 189 | 40 | 775 | 169 | 198 | 16 | 1062 | 114 | 84 | 23 | 362 |
| Progressive motility (%) | 36 | 54 | 15 | 21 | 89 | 46 | 21 | 14 | 91 | 48 | 19 | 4 | 72 |
| Non-progressive motility (%) | 36 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 21 | 14 | 9 | 1 | 37 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 38 |
| Immotile (%) | 36 | 36 | 14 | 9 | 74 | 41 | 18 | 8 | 71 | 37 | 20 | 11 | 81 |
| Normal morphology (%) | 36 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 19 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 22 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 18 |
| Head defects (%) | 36 | 65 | 16 | 29 | 95 | 74 | 14 | 37 | 94 | 67 | 12 | 31 | 88 |
| Midpiece defects (%) | 36 | 25 | 14 | 6 | 49 | 34 | 14 | 2 | 69 | 32 | 13 | 16 | 60 |
| Tail defects (%) | 36 | 22 | 16 | 1 | 59 | 25 | 15 | 0 | 60 | 26 | 13 | 6 | 51 |
| Total antioxidant capacity (TAS) (mmol/l) | 22 | 1.44 | 0.75 | 0.27 | 2.63 | 1.65 | 0.64 | 0.37 | 2.58 | 1.69 | 0.69 | 0.07 | 2.52 |
| 3-Nitrotyrosine (3-NT) (AU) | 24 | 110.94 | 130.15 | 0.42 | 383.33 | 138.54 | 152.94 | 0.39 | 419.37 | 99.88 | 106.52 | 0.27 | 273.19 |
| Superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) (AU) | 23 | 2.22 | 3.50 | 0.36 | 15.59 | 1.79 | 3.23 | 0.23 | 15.95 | 7.33 | 18.57 | 0.12 | 81.42 |
| Glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPx4) (AU) | 22 | 0.64 | 1.11 | 0.07 | 5.26 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.04 | 1.63 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.03 | 2.67 |
| Carbonyl groups (CG) (AU) | 12 | 130.06 | 85.27 | 56.27 | 362.25 | 139.43 | 86.09 | 76.69 | 392.99 | 107.92 | 35.18 | 68.01 | 172.59 |
| Citric acid (mg) | 12 | 13.60 | 6.30 | 5.87 | 25.55 | 12.10 | 8.86 | 4.31 | 36.74 | 8.65 | 3.61 | 4.24 | 13.65 |
| Frutose (mg) | 12 | 11.30 | 7.24 | 2.31 | 29.01 | 10.68 | 7.72 | 1.47 | 25.71 | 8.18 | 5.98 | 2.42 | 19.06 |
| Neutral alfa-glucosidase (mIU) | 12 | 57.07 | 45.17 | 21.27 | 190.42 | 47.26 | 40.98 | 5.97 | 138.46 | 30.90 | 30.42 | 6.42 | 122.74 |
Figure 2Box plot of the alcohol (A) and nicotine (B) consumptions, basic semen parameters (C–K), oxidative stress marker (L) and epididymal (M) and accessory sex glands (N and O) function markers at the different time points (TP). p-values of paired-samples tests are summarized in Table 2.
Paired difference tests between the study time-points (TPs).
| N | Paired groups | p value (2-tailed) | Effect size Cohen’d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol consumption | 36 | TP1 vs TP2 | 0.00a | 1.1 |
| TP2 vs TP3 | 0.00a | 1.1 | ||
| Nicotine consumption | 36 | TP1 vs TP2 | 0.00a | 0.3 |
| Volume | 36 | TP1 vs TP2 | 0.02a | 0.4 |
| TP1 vs TP3 | 0.00a | 0.8 | ||
| TP2 vs TP3 | 0.04a | 0.3 | ||
| Concentration | 36 | TP1 vs TP3 | 0.04a | 0.3 |
| Total number of spermatozoa | 36 | TP1 vs TP3 | 0.00a | 0.8 |
| Progressive motility | 36 | TP1 vs TP2 | 0.01a | 0.4 |
| Non-progressive motility | 36 | TP1 vs TP2 | 0.04a | 0.5 |
| TP1 vs TP3 | 0.002a | 0.8 | ||
| Immotile | 36 | TP1 vs TP2 | 0.05a | 0.3 |
| Normal morphology | 36 | TP1 vs TP2 | 0.00a | 0.4 |
| TP1 vs TP3 | 0.00a | 0.5 | ||
| Head defects | 36 | TP1 vs TP2 | 0.00a | 0.6 |
| TP2 vs TP3 | 0.001a | 0.5 | ||
| Midpiece defects | 36 | TP1 vs TP2 | 0.00a | 0.6 |
| TP1 vs TP3 | 0.00a | 0.5 | ||
| 3-Nitrotyrosine (3-NT) | 24 | TP2 vs TP3 | 0.01b | 0.3 |
| Citric acid | 12 | TP1 vs TP3 | 0.03a | 1.0 |
| Frutose | 12 | TP1 vs TP3 | 0.02a | 0.5 |
| TP2 vs TP3 | 0.04a | 0.4 | ||
| Neutral α-glucosidase | 12 | TP1 vs TP3 | 0.02a | 0.7 |
| TP2 vs TP3 | 0.04c | 0.5 | ||
aT-test; bWilcoxon Signed Ranks test (asymp. sig.); cSign test (exact sig.) - Binomial distribution used.
Figure 3Early (TP2) and late (TP3) short-term impact on seminal quality of the abusive behaviors to which volunteers were exposed during academic festivities week.
TP, time-points.