Mahdieh Taghizadeh1, Mehrdad Noruzinia1. 1. Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The stem cell theory in the endometriosis provides an advanced avenue of targeting these cells as a novel therapy to eliminate endometriosis. In this regard, studies showed that lovastatin alters the cells from a stem-like state to more differentiated condition and reduces stemness. The aim of this study was to investigate whether lovastatin treatment could influence expression and methylation patterns of genes regulating differentiation of endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs) such as BMP2, GATA2 and RUNX2 as well as eMSCs markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental investigation, MSCs were isolated from endometrial and endometriotic tissues and treated with lovastatin and decitabin. To investigate the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of eMSCs treated with the different concentration of lovastatin and decitabin, BMP2, RUNX2 and GATA2 expressions were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). To determine involvement of DNA methylation in BMP2 and GATA2 gene regulations of eMSCs, we used quantitative Methylation Specific PCR (qMSP) for evaluation of the BMP2 promoter status and differentially methylated region of GATA2 exon 4. RESULTS: In the present study, treatment with lovastatin increased expression of BMP2 and RUNX2 and induced BMP2 promoter demethylation. We also demonstrated that lovastatin treatment down-regulated GATA2 expression via inducing methylation. In addition, the results indicated that CD146 cell marker was decreased to 53% in response to lovastatin treatment compared to untreated group. CONCLUSION: These findings indicated that lovastatin treatment could increase the differentiation of eMSCs toward osteogenic and adiogenic lineages, while it decreased expression of eMSCs markers and subsequently reduced the stemness.
OBJECTIVE: The stem cell theory in the endometriosis provides an advanced avenue of targeting these cells as a novel therapy to eliminate endometriosis. In this regard, studies showed that lovastatin alters the cells from a stem-like state to more differentiated condition and reduces stemness. The aim of this study was to investigate whether lovastatin treatment could influence expression and methylation patterns of genes regulating differentiation of endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs) such as BMP2, GATA2 and RUNX2 as well as eMSCs markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental investigation, MSCs were isolated from endometrial and endometriotic tissues and treated with lovastatin and decitabin. To investigate the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of eMSCs treated with the different concentration of lovastatin and decitabin, BMP2, RUNX2 and GATA2 expressions were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). To determine involvement of DNA methylation in BMP2 and GATA2 gene regulations of eMSCs, we used quantitative Methylation Specific PCR (qMSP) for evaluation of the BMP2 promoter status and differentially methylated region of GATA2 exon 4. RESULTS: In the present study, treatment with lovastatin increased expression of BMP2 and RUNX2 and induced BMP2 promoter demethylation. We also demonstrated that lovastatin treatment down-regulated GATA2 expression via inducing methylation. In addition, the results indicated that CD146 cell marker was decreased to 53% in response to lovastatin treatment compared to untreated group. CONCLUSION: These findings indicated that lovastatin treatment could increase the differentiation of eMSCs toward osteogenic and adiogenic lineages, while it decreased expression of eMSCs markers and subsequently reduced the stemness.
Endometriosis is a non-cancerous gynecological disorder characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stromal cells outside the uterine cavity (1). It can be considered as the obvious cause of disability in the women with the reproductive ages affecting 6-12% of the asymptomatic women, approximately 71-78% of women suffering chronic pelvic pain and up to 5% of the infertile women (2,4).Pathogenesis of endometriosis includes metaplastic alteration of epithelial cells in the peritoneal surface (5), retrograde of endometrial cells, immunological insufficiency, genetics and epigenetics (6,7), as well as hormone disruption (8). Highly embraced hypothesis for the endometriosis development is retrograde menstruation (9). It was found that women
with endometriosis have a considerable amount
of basalis endometrium in their menstrual
debris than those without endometriosis (10),
more likely because of the excessive uterine
peristaltic contractions in women suffering
this disease (11). The importance of basalis
layer of endometrium in the endometriotic
lesion development can be related to the large
numbers of stem cells in this area (12). In this
respect, some studies also revealed that the
stem cell theory has a significant role in the
endometriosis pathogenesis (13, 14).In addition, recent medications were found
to have severe side-effects for treating
endometriosis. Therefore, topnotch and effective
treatments for endometriosis are required. The
main mode of action for all of the present
medications in treating pains, associated with
endometriosis, is mostly caused by suppression
of the implants proliferation (15, 16). The
theory of stem cell in endometriosis began the
last advanced avenue in the targeting these cells
as cutting-edge therapy (17).In this respect, lovastatin shifts the cells from a
stem-like state to more differentiated condition
and reduces the stemness (18). Furthermore,
lovastatin is effective in the suppression
of cell proliferation and angiogenesis in an
experimental model of endometriosis (19). In
this line, lovastatin function via modulating
DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) activity,
altering methylation of gene promoters, and
consequently regulating mRNA expression in
the various malignancies (18, 20).On the other hand, activity of DNMTs, the
enzymes that catalyze addition of methyl
groups to cytosine residues in DNA, is elevated
in the ectopic endometrium compared to the
normal control (21). DNMT inhibitors have
profoundly been examined as the promising
novel drugs for endometriosis treatment (22-
24). Recently, decitabine and 5-azacytidine
have been introduced into the clinical trial
experiment (25), but it was found that DNMT
inhibitors cause considerable toxicity. In
addition, they interfere with protein translation
procedure through incorporating into RNA (26,
27). Because of this reason, drugs like statins,
demonstrating DNMT inhibitory function with
no toxic side-effect, would open up a new
horizon regarding the novel advancement in the
disease treatment.Some investigations revealed that lovastatin
treatment leads to demethylation of the BMP2
promoter, up-regulation of the BMP2 mRNA
and activation of BMP signaling pathway.
Consequently, these alterations induce
colorectal cancer (CRC) cell differentiation
and reduce proliferation of the respective cells
(18, 28).Moreover, BMP pathway, particularly BMP2
plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of
endometriosis (29). BMP2, a tumor growth
factor (TGF) superfamily member, acts down-
stream of PGR and is essential for the stromal
cell differentiation and decidualization in
both mouse and human endometrium (30).
Furthermore, Aghajanova et al. (31) found that
BMP-2 can promote osteogenic differentiation
of the human endometrial stem cells.In this study, we initially set out to determine
(1) whether lovastatin treatment influences
methylation status of the BMP2 promoter as
well as mRNA expression of the respective
gene and (2) whether lovastatin can also alter
the expression level of other genes playing
pivotal role in differentiation and proliferation
potential of endometrial mesenchymal stem
cells (eMSCs), such as GATA2 and RUNX2 (32,
33). Additionally, we then evaluated the effects
of lovastatin on the endometrial stem cell
markers derived from the patient and normal
individuals.
Materials and Methods
Patients
This experimental investigation was approved
by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty
of Medicine at Tarbiat Modares University in
Iran. Endometrial and endometriotic tissues
were obtained from six patients (endometrial
tissues from three patients; endometriosis
samples from three patients) at Obstetric
Gynecology Department of Sarem Women Hospital (Tehran, Iran). The patients were
undergone hysterectomy and laparoscopy
for benign pathologies and written informed
consent was also received from the participants.
The surgery was performed irrespective of the
day of patient’s menstrual cycle. The exclusion
criteria were any endometrial abnormality (e.g.
polyps, hyperplasia or cancer), administration
of the hormonal treatment and gonadotropin-
releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist therapy.
Additionally, this study was performed
according to the Helsinki declaration.
Mesenchymal stem cells isolation and expansion
First, tissue was separated and washed with
the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). It was
minced into the small pieces measuring 1 mm3
and digested with 1 mg/ml collagenase type I
(Sigma, Germany) for 60 minutes at 37˚C and
centrifuged for 10 minutes at 500 g. Second,
cells were plated in the 25 cm2tissue culture
using Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium
(DMEM, Biowest, France) supplemented with
20% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, USA), 50
mg/ml of streptomycin and 50 U/ml of penicillin
(Invitrogen, USA) at 37˚C in 95% air and 5%
CO2. After that, when cultures reached at 80 to
90% confluence, eMSCs were trypsinized using
trypsin EDTA 0.25% (Biowest, France) and
then the media were replaced. For this study
cells were treated with lovastatin and decitabin
at the passage four.
Flow cytometry analysis
To characterize and quantify the expression
of MSCs markers according to the surface
molecular markers (34), flow cytometry analysis
was performed. First, cells were detached with
trypsin EDTA 25% at the end of third passage
and washed with PBS by centrifugation (300 g,
5 minutes). After that, cells (1×106cells) were
incubated with the monoclonal antibodies (e.g.
CD90, CD44, CD146, CD45 and CD34) and
the matched-isotype control for 30 minutes at
4˚C. Finally, cell analysis was performed using
Partec CyFlow® Space flow cytometer system
(German Biotechnology Company, Germany)
and the flowmax Software.
Osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of
endometrial mesenchymal stem cells
In order to perform the osteogenic and
adipogenic differentiation, eMSCs were seeded
at the density of 2×104cells/cm2 in 24-well
tissue culture plates and incubated in DMEM
overnight at 37˚C and 5% CO2 until 80%
confluency. Differentiation was carried out using
osteogenic and adipogenic media according
to the manufacturer’s instructions. In this
respect, osteogenic differentiation was induced
using DMEM high glucose supplemented with
10% FBS, 10 nM dexamethasone, 10 mM
β-glycerophosphate and 10 μM ascorbic acid
2-phosphates (both from Sigma) for 21 days.
Additionally, adipogenic differentiation was
carried out by culturing eMSCs in DMEM
high glucose supplemented with 10% FBS,
1 µM dexamethasone, 10 µM ascorbic acid
2-phosphate and 200 μM indomethacin (both
from Sigma) for 21 days. Three weeks later,
osteogenic and adipogenic differentiations were
confirmed by Alizarin Red and Oil Red (both
from Sigma) staining, respectively (35).
MTT assay
First, eMSCs derived from the endometriotic
tissues were seeded at the density of 1×104cells/cm2 in a 24-well plate and cultured for
24 hours. Second, cells were treated with 1,
2 and 5 µM lovastatin diluted in dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO), for 72 hours. Then,
eMSCs were incubated with standard medium
containing 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-
diphenyltetrazolium bromide (Sigma) with final
concentration of 0.5 mg/ml (stock solution 5
mg/ml MTT in PBS) for 4 hours at 37˚C. At the
end of experiment, the medium was removed
and 500 μl DMSO was added. Absorbance was
evaluated at 540 nm in a 96-well plate using
an Anthos 2020 Microplate Readers (Austria).
Experiments were carried out in triplicate, from
three independent experiments (36, 37).
Treatment of endometrial mesenchymal stem
cells with lovastatin and decitabin
First, MSCs from the human endometrium and
endometriosis were seeded at an initial density of 60% confluence. They were then allowed to
be attached overnight, and after that treated with
lovastatin and decitabin (both from Sigma).
According to the previous investigations (33,
38), MSCs were treated in the 1, 2 and 5 µM
concentration of lovastatin for 72 hours, while
these cells were treated in DMSO, as vehicle
group. In addition, dose of 2 µM was used for
decitabin treatment in the MSCs for 72 hours
(39). After treatment, the cells were trypsinized
and used for flow cytometry analysis, real-
time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and
quantitative methylation specific PCR (qMSP).
RNA extraction and quantitative analysis by
real-time polymerase chain reaction
First, total RNA was isolated from the
eMSCs with High Pure RNA Isolation
Kit (Roche, Germany) according to the
manufacturer’s protocol. Second, the purity of
RNA was determined, by gel electrophoresis,
photospectrometrically (ratio 260/280 nm),
and by RT-PCR reactions. For each sample, 1
µg of RNA was used to generate cDNA with
RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit
(Thermo Scientific, USA). Then, quantitative
reverse transcriptase PCR was carried out to
determine the expression of genes encoding
Bone Morphogenetic Protein2 (BMP2), GATA
binding protein 2 (GATA2), Runt-related
transcription factor (RUNX2), hypoxanthine
phosphoribosyl transferase 1 (HPRT1) with
StepOne™ Real-Time PCR system (Applied
Biosystems, USA). Primers used for SYBR
Green assay were:BMP2F: 5ˊ-CCACCATGAAGAATCTTTGGAAGAAC-3ˊR: 5ˊ-TGATAAACTCCTCCGTGGGGA-3ˊGATA2F: 5ˊ-GCTCGTTCCTGTTCAGAAGGC-3ˊR: 5ˊ-CCCATTCATCTTGTGGTAGAGGC-3ˊRUNX2F: 5ˊ-CCCCACGACAACCGCACCAT-3ˊR: 5ˊ-CGCTCCGGCCCACAAATCTC -3ˊ (40)HPRTF: 5ˊ-GGTCCTTTTCACCAGCAAGCT-3ˊR: 5ˊ-TGACACTGGCAAAACAATGCA-3ˊ.HPRT values were used for normalization.
PCR product length for BMP2, GATA2, RUNX2
and HPRT primers was 101, 126, 289, and 94
bp, respectively. Gene expression was calculated
using the ΔΔCt method (41).
Sodium bisulfite treatment of genomic DNA
First, DNA was isolated from eMSCs using
High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit
(Roche) as recommended by the manufacturer’s
instruction. Second, for sodium bisulfite
treatment, 300 ng of DNA was denatured by 0.2
M NaOH for 10 minutes at 37˚C in 50 ml total
volume. Then, 30 µl of freshly prepared 10 mM
hydroquinone (Merck, US) and 520 μl of 3.5 M
sodium bisulfite (pH=5, Merck, US) were added
to the samples. After that, each DNA sample
was incubated at 50˚C for 16 hours. Samples
were also purified with Roche DNA purification
columns based on the manufacturer’s instruction
and eluted in 200 μl of elution buffer. At last,
samples were desulfonated by 0.3 M NaOH
treatment for 5 minutes at 20˚C. Finally, after
ethanol precipitation, DNA was dissolved in 30
μl distilled water (42).
Quantitative Methylation Specific polymerase
chain reaction
For analyzing BMP2 promoter methylation,
MethySYBR Method was performed with
StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied
Biosystems). In this study, according to the
one-step MethySYBR method (43), the primers
(BMP2-EXT-F and BMP2-EXT-R; product
length=308) were used in the externally nested
real time PCR amplified the target gene regardless
of their methylation status. This was used as a
reference control to normalize the proportion of
methylated target alleles which were detected by
the methylation specific primer pair (BMP2-FM
and BMP2-RM, product length=113) between
the samples. Each reaction contained 20-25 ng
of bisulfite-treated DNA as a template, 10 ml
2x RealQ Master Mix ampliqon and 500 nM of
each forward and reverse primer (Table 1) in a
total volume of 20 µl. For BMP2, real-time PCR
thermocyclic conditions included an initial step
of 10 minutes at 95˚C, followed by 40 cycles of
95˚C for 15 seconds, and 60˚C for 30 seconds.
Table 1
Primer sequences for qMSP analysis of GATA2 and BMP2
Gene name
Primer sequences (5ˊ-3ˊ)
BMP2-EXT
F: GTGTATTGGAGTAAGGTAGAGTGATG
R: CCCAACCAAATACTAACACACAACAAC
BMP2-FM
F: GGTTGTTTCGAGTTATGGGTCGC
R: AAAACCAACGCCCGAAAAACGCG
GATA2-Ex4-Meth
F: TTCGCGTAGTTGTTGTTTTTAGAC
R: GAACCCAATACTCACCGTACG
GATA2-Ex4-Un
F: TTGTGTAGTTGTTGTTTTTAGATGA
R: ACAAACCCAATACTCACCATACAC
In this method, plasmid template was included
as the control for calculation of methylation
percentage of each sample. Methylated DNA
level was calculated with 2-ΔΔCt
in which ΔΔCt equals to ΔCt sample-ΔCt plasmid
(43). Furthermore,
to evaluate the methylation status of GATA2,
we performed qMSP using the primers directed
against differentially methylated regions
of exon 4 of GATA2. Briefly, primers were
designed to determine either the methylated
or unmethylated form of the sequence after
the bisulfite converted sequences of the sense
strand. Primer information is provided in Table 1. For GATA2, the thermocyclic conditions of
real-time PCR included an initial denaturation
step of 10 minute at 95˚C, followed by 40
cycles of 95˚C for 15 seconds and 57˚C for 30
seconds. Additionally, the product length for
the GATA2-Meth and GATA2-Unmeth primers
was 139 bp.
Statistical analysis
Comparison of gene expressions, methylation
values as well as cell viability tests between
samples were assessed with a two tailed student’s
t test using GraphPad Prism 6 software. Results
were statistically significant at a P<0.05.
Results
Isolation and characterization of endometrial
mesenchymal stem cells
MSCs from human endometrium were
isolated and cultured, while they predominantly
had fibroblastic shape as expected (Fig.1A). To
evaluate differentiation potential of eMSCs,
induction to adipogenic and osteogenic lineage
was performed in vitro. A potential for the
differentiation to adipogenic lineage was
confirmed through staining of lipid vacuoles
by oil red (Fig.1B). Furthermore, osteogenic
differentiation was detected through alizarin
red staining of calcium deposits (Fig.1C). Flow
cytometer analysis indicated that cells expressed
the mesenchymal markers CD44 (94.60%),
CD90 (94.33%) and CD146 (94.83%), but they
lacked hematopoietic markers including CD45
(3.77%) and CD34 (5.40%) (Fig.1D-H).
Fig.1
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) characterization. Human endometrial MSCs (eMSCs) exhibited, A. A fibroblast-like cell
shape. These cells also represented successful, B. Adipogenic, C. Osteogenic differentiation potential, showing a positive
signal for D. CD44 (94.60%), E. CD90 (94.33%), F. CD146 (94.83%) and no signal for G. CD45 (3.77%), and H. CD34 (5.40%)
markers (n=3).
Primer sequences for qMSP analysis of GATA2 and BMP2Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) characterization. Human endometrial MSCs (eMSCs) exhibited, A. A fibroblast-like cell
shape. These cells also represented successful, B. Adipogenic, C. Osteogenic differentiation potential, showing a positive
signal for D. CD44 (94.60%), E. CD90 (94.33%), F. CD146 (94.83%) and no signal for G. CD45 (3.77%), and H. CD34 (5.40%)
markers (n=3).
Lovastatin mediates up-regulation of BMP2
and RUNX2
To investigate the effect of different
lovastatin concentrations on BMP2 and RUNX2
mRNA expression, eMSCs were isolated
from the patient and normal individuals and
then were incubated for 72 hours with 2 and
5 µM concentrations of lovastatin. Relative
expression amounts of BMP2 in plates treated
with the different concentrations of lovastatin,
vehicle (DMSO) and 2 µM decitabin, as the
positive control, are shown in Figure 2. In
comparison with untreated control of both
groups, relative expressions of BMP2 at 2 µM
lovastatin-treated eMSCs were 1.69 ± 0.26 and
2.22 ± 0.1 fold further than those of control
eMSCs in the patients and normal groups,
respectively. Statistical analysis showed a
significant difference between 2 μM lovastatin
and control in both groups (P<0.05, Student’s
t test). Furthermore, RUNX2 expression was
markedly up-regulated in the plates treated
with 2 and 5 µM of lovastatin as well as 2 µM
decitabin in comparison with the untreated
control of patient group (2.58 ± 0.32 fold, 1.86
± 0.22 fold and 2.26 ± 0.18 fold, respectively,
P<0.05 for 2 and 5 µM of lovastatin and P<0.01
for 2 µM decitabin). RUNX2 expression was
also up-regulated in plates treated with 2 and
5 µM of lovastatin as well as 2 µM decitabin
compared to the untreated control of normal
group (3.35 ± 0.21 fold, 2.02 ± 0.10 fold and
2.12 ± 0.10 fold respectively, P<0.05).
Fig.2
BMP2 and RUNX2 expressions following the lovastatin treatment in endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs) cultures of three
patients and three normal individuals, detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A. Relative expression of
BMP2 at 2 μM statin-treated eMSCs was 1.69 ± 0.26 and 2.22 ± 0.1 fold higher than those of control eMSCs in patient and normal groups,
respectively (P<0.05, Student’s t test) and B. RUNX2 expression was up-regulated in plates treated with 2 and 5 µM of lovastatin as well as
2 µM decitabin in comparison with untreated control of patient group (2.58 ± 0.32 fold, 1.86 ± 0.22 fold and 2.26 ± 0.18 fold respectively,
P<0.05 for 2 and 5 µM of lovastatin and P<0.01 for 2 µM decitabin) and normal group (3.35 ± 0.21 fold, 2.02 ± 0.10 fold and 2.12 ± 0.10
fold respectively.
*; P<0.05 and **; P<0.01 in comparison to untreated control in each groups.
Lovastatin mediates down-regulation of GATA2
Following 2 μM lovastatin treatment, GATA2
expression was slightly down-regulated, while the
expression of GATA2 was significantly decreased
in response to 5 μM lovastatin treatment in
comparison with the untreated control of patient
group (Fig.3, 0.57 ± 0.14 fold, P<0.05). On the
other hand, GATA2 expression at 2 μM statin-
treated eMSCs were 1.75 ± 0.07 fold higher than
those of the control eMSCs in normal (Fig.3,
P<0.05). There was also no significant difference
in the expression levels of GATA2 in response to 2
µM decitabin, compared to the untreated control
of both groups.
Fig.3
GATA2 expression following the lovastatin treatment in endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs) cultures of three patients and three normal individuals, detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Relative expression
of GATA2 was decreased in response to 5 μM lovastatin treatment in comparison with untreated control of patient gro0.57 ±
0.14 fold (P<0.05). On the other hand, GATA2 expression at 2 μM
lovastatin-treated eMSCs was 1.75 ± 0.07 fold higher than those
of control eMSCs in normal.
*; P<0.05 in comparison to untreated control in each groups.
BMP2 and RUNX2 expressions following the lovastatin treatment in endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs) cultures of three
patients and three normal individuals, detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A. Relative expression of
BMP2 at 2 μM statin-treated eMSCs was 1.69 ± 0.26 and 2.22 ± 0.1 fold higher than those of control eMSCs in patient and normal groups,
respectively (P<0.05, Student’s t test) and B. RUNX2 expression was up-regulated in plates treated with 2 and 5 µM of lovastatin as well as
2 µM decitabin in comparison with untreated control of patient group (2.58 ± 0.32 fold, 1.86 ± 0.22 fold and 2.26 ± 0.18 fold respectively,
P<0.05 for 2 and 5 µM of lovastatin and P<0.01 for 2 µM decitabin) and normal group (3.35 ± 0.21 fold, 2.02 ± 0.10 fold and 2.12 ± 0.10
fold respectively.*; P<0.05 and **; P<0.01 in comparison to untreated control in each groups.GATA2 expression following the lovastatin treatment in endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs) cultures of three patients and three normal individuals, detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Relative expression
of GATA2 was decreased in response to 5 μM lovastatin treatment in comparison with untreated control of patient gro0.57 ±
0.14 fold (P<0.05). On the other hand, GATA2 expression at 2 μM
lovastatin-treated eMSCs was 1.75 ± 0.07 fold higher than those
of control eMSCs in normal.*; P<0.05 in comparison to untreated control in each groups.
Lovastatin treatment leads to epigenetic
modification of the BMP2 and GATA2
To determine involvement of DNA methylation in
the BMP2 gene down-regulation of eMSCs treated
with the different concentration of lovastatin, we
used quantitative Methylation Specific PCR (qMSP)
for the respective promoter status, starting 214 bp
upstream of exon 1. This region contains a CpG
island that methylated in the gastric and colorectal
cancers (18, 44). As Figure 4A shows, lovastatin
treatment induced demethylation of the BMP2
promoter in eMSCs treated with 2 μM lovastatin
for 72 hours. The qMSP results showed that BMP2
promoter methylation was decreased from 28.2 to
7.6% in eMSCs after treatment with 2 μM lovastatin
for 72 hours (P<0.05, Student’s t test).We also performed qMSP for GATA2 before and
after lovastatin and decitabin treatments using the
methylated and unmethylated primers directed
against differentially methylated region of GATA2
exon 4 (45). As Figure 4B shows, lovastatin treatment
induced methylation of the differentially methylated
region of GATA2 exon 4 in eMSCs treated for 72
hours with 2 and 5 μM lovastatin. The qMSP results
showed that the GATA2 exon 4 methylation was
increased in eMSCs from 12.0 to 26.95 and 70.49%
after treatment with 2 and 5 μM lovastatin for 72
hours, respectively (P<0.05, Student’s t test).Quantitative methylation specific PCR (qMSP) analysis of
BMP2 promoter region and GATA2 exon 4 in endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs) treated with different concentration of
lovastatin. A. qMSP results showed that BMP2 promoter methylation was decreased from 28.2 to 7.6% after treatment with 2 μM of
lovastatin for 72 hours (P<0.05, Student’s t test) and B. qMSP results
showed that GATA2 exon 4 methylation was increased from 12.0 to
26.95 and 70.49% after treatment with 2 and 5 μM of lovastatin for
72 hours, respectively.*; P<0.05 in comparison to untreated control in each groups.
No influence on the cell viability by lovastatin
up to 5 µM concentration
Changes in the cell viability could lead to a
decrease in cell number and a low influence on
cell therapy. In order to determine the effects of
lovastatin (diluted in DMSO) and DMSO on eMSCs
viability, cells were incubated with 1, 2 and 5 µM
lovastatin for 72 hours, and then, mitochondrial
dehydrogenase activity was evaluated in the living
cells by the MTT test (46). The cell viability in
vehicle as well as treatment group was observed
in approximately 80% of cells in comparison to
the untreated group. However, statistical analysis
showed a significant difference at the enzyme level
under 2 and 5 µM lovastatin and DMSO treatment
(Fig.5, P<0.05, Student’s t test).
Fig.5
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were plated in 24 well plates and either no treated, or treated with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or
1, 2 and 5 μM lovastatin (diluted in DMSO) for 72 hours, followed by MTT test. Values are shown as living cells percentage relative to the
control untreated cells with set at 100% in control values. Results expressed the mean ± SD (n=3).
*; P<0.05 in comparison to untreated control in each groups.
Lovastatin down-regulates the melanoma cell
adhesion molecule
To investigate the effect of lovastatin on
eMSCs markers, cells were treated with 1 μM
lovastatin for 72 hours and then, analyzed by
flow cytometer. The results indicated that
CD146 cell marker was down-regulated to 53%
in response to 1 µM lovastatin, compared to the
untreated group (Fig.6, P<0.05, Student’s t test).
In this respect, recent studies have shown that
Melanoma Cell Adhesion Molecule (MCAM/
CD146) was a key marker of endometrial stem/
progenitor cells involved in the inflammation
and angiogenesis procedures (47, 48).
Fig.6
Flow cytometry analysis of eMSCs markers treated with 1 µM lovastatin. The results indicated that CD146 cell marker was down-regulated to 53% in response to 1 μM lovastatin in comparison with untreated group. Data are from three experiments ± SD (n=3).
*; P<0.05 in comparison to untreated control.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were plated in 24 well plates and either no treated, or treated with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or
1, 2 and 5 μM lovastatin (diluted in DMSO) for 72 hours, followed by MTT test. Values are shown as living cells percentage relative to the
control untreated cells with set at 100% in control values. Results expressed the mean ± SD (n=3).*; P<0.05 in comparison to untreated control in each groups.Flow cytometry analysis of eMSCs markers treated with 1 µM lovastatin. The results indicated that CD146 cell marker was down-regulated to 53% in response to 1 μM lovastatin in comparison with untreated group. Data are from three experiments ± SD (n=3).*; P<0.05 in comparison to untreated control.
Discussion
Stem cell theory began the final advanced avenue for the etiology of endometriosis. A great number of studies demonstrated presence of the endometrial stem cells, not only from residing cells in the endometrium but also from reprograming bone marrow MSCs (17). Feasibility of targeting stem cells was suggested to be as of the remarkable advancement to eliminate endometriosis (49).This study evaluated the effect of lovastatin on eMSCs properties including differentiation and proliferation potential. In the current experiment, BMP2 activity was significantly augmented in eMSCs within three days after treatment with 2 µM concentration of lovastatin. BMP2 activity was proved to be a marker of osteogenesis differentiation (38). Previous studies have demonstrated that lovastatin increased the level of BMP2 gene expression (50,51). Moreover, BMP2 reportedly was downregulated in endometriosis (29). In this respect, there was remarkable evidence showing that BMP2 signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in the decidualization (52,53). The study carried out by van Kaam et al. (54) revealed that both ectopic and eutopic endometrium of patients suffering from endometriosis demonstrated a decreased capacity for differentiation, as well as decidualization and implantation.In addition, RUNX2 expression level was significantly increased in the treatment of 2 and 5 μM lovastatin, compared to the control group. RUNX2 is a major downstream mediator of BMP2, functioning and playing a critical role in the stromal differentiation and decidualization (55). Furthermore, MSCs differentiation towards osteogenic lineage was determined by definite group of elements (56). Among these factors, the first and highly specific marker was RUNX2. In this line, RUNX2 activated osteogenic differentiation by signaling pathways including BMP2 and TGF-β1 (57,58).In the present study, expression of GATA2 was investigated in eMSCs after lovastatin treatment. In this case, GATA2 mRNA level was significantly decreased in response to the 5 μM lovastatin treatment, compared to the untreated control of patient group.Increasingly, it was found that GATA2 expression, a member of the six zinc-finger family transcription factors, was essential for various tissues including urogenital and hematopoietic system and adipose maturation (59). Moreover, Kamata et al. (32) demonstrated that GATA2 could be one of the significant factors regulating differentiation of bone marrow MSCs toward adipocytes. Given the results of previous investigations (59,32), reduction of GATA2 in response to lovastatin treatment might be in favor of decreased proliferation and increased differentiation potentials. However, this observation should be confirmed by other studies.Furthermore, SYBR Green-based quantitative real time PCR method was performed to analyze DNA methylation level in eMSCs. The MethySYBR assay is a very sensitive, precise and less vulnerable to false positives (60). In this study, lovastatin treatment induced DNA demethylation and reactivation of BMP2 gene expression, which was suppressed by hypermethylation in the endometriosis. More importantly, we found demethylation of other methylated genes including RUNX2 in the endometriosis after treatment with lovastatin, implying more general effect on gene hypermethylation. Given the results of this study, it is not obvious how lovastatin inhibits DNMTs. Kodach et al. (18) showed that lovastatin has either little or no effect on DNMTs expression levels. Therefore, further investigations are required to evaluate the mechanism(s) by which lovastatin inhibit DNMTs. On the other hand, we found that lovastatin induced methylation of GATA2 factor. This result was in consistent with the latest data reported by MacLeod et al. (20), showing that lovastatin therapy is related to higher MTHFR methylation levels in a stroke group implying that statins can induce DNA methylation.We also evaluated the effect of lovastatin on expression of MSCs markers. Some recent investigations have indicated that CD146 could be considered as a highly specific marker of endometrial stem/progenitor cells (17,61). In addition, Figueira et al. (13) used CD146 marker to identify mesenchymal stem cells for the first time. The eMSCs expressed typical MSC surface markers including CD44, CD90 and CD105.In this study, flow cytometer data displayed that CD146 was reduced in response to lovastatin treatment in eMSCs, suggesting that CD146 could effectively be implicated in the endometriosis pathogenesis by activating the angiogenesis and inflammation (47). Additionally, CD146 is an endothe¬lial cell adhesion molecule that is upregulated in different types of malignant cell, such as ovarian cancer (62,65). A great number of experiments have suggested that CD146 induced angiogenesis, tumor growth and metastasis (66). Moreover, Flanagan et al. (67) showed that laminin-411 attached to CD146 enabling TH17 cell penetrate into the tissues and induce inflammation. Studies have revealed that lovastatin, which is a potent inhibitor for the expression of VEGF, plays a pivotal role in diminishing blood-vessel formation (68). Similarly, in the recent study, Jiang et al. (69) reported that CD146 interacts with VEGFR-2 in a tumor angiogenesis mechanism. In line with previous investigations, our research presents a new target of action for lovastatin, in inhibition of angiogenesis via suppressing CD146.Based on the previous in vitro studies, doses of 1 to 5 µM were used for lovastatin treatment in MSCs (33,38). In these experiments, mild growth stimulatory effects in eMSCs were derived from human endometrium, and endometriosis was observed at dose of 1 and 5 µM. In addition, Kupcsik et al. (38) revealed that lovastatin concentration at 10 µM is associated with cytotoxic effects and leads to detachment of eMSC from culture plate.Zhou and Hu (23) showed that stem cell differentiation could be augmented by DNA demethylation, starting advancement for studying the induction of stem cell fate through epigenetic reprograming. In this study, for the first time, we demonstrated that aberrant demethylation of CpG island promoter of BMP2 occurred in endometriosis tissues. We also provided a facet of molecular basis of the BMP2 down-regulation in these tissues from the viewpoint of epigenetic disease. It is hoped that epigenetic reprograming of BMP2 becomes a helpful cue for the further research in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.
Conclusion
The proposed mechanisms of statins action on the endometriosis tissues are suppression of endometrial cells proliferation and apoptosis, reduction of oxidative stress and inflammation, and inhibition of the angiogenesis. Our study indicated that lovastatin treatment could increase osteogenic differentiation through up-regulation of BMP2 and RUNX2 mRNA expression. In addition, reduction of GATA2 in response to lovastatin treatment might be in favor of increased adipogenic differentiation potentials. Expression of stem cell markers and subsequently stemness was also reduced in the eMSCs after lovastatin treatment.Furthermore, consistent with the previous studies, our investigation revealed that lovastatin decreased angiogenesis and increased implantation and decidualization.Several recent investigations have suggested that statins could have a pivotal role in the medical management of women suffering from endometriosis. They also offer clinical benefits without interfering in estrogen. Despite this fact, more clinical trials are needed to confirm the safety and effectiveness of this kind of treatment in endometriosis.
Authors: Lewis R Silverman; Erin P Demakos; Bercedis L Peterson; Alice B Kornblith; Jimmie C Holland; Rosalie Odchimar-Reissig; Richard M Stone; Douglas Nelson; Bayard L Powell; Carlos M DeCastro; John Ellerton; Richard A Larson; Charles A Schiffer; James F Holland Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Quanxi Li; Athilakshmi Kannan; Wei Wang; Francesco J Demayo; Robert N Taylor; Milan K Bagchi; Indrani C Bagchi Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2007-08-21 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Liudmila L Kodach; Sylvia A Bleuming; Maikel P Peppelenbosch; Daniel W Hommes; Gijs R van den Brink; James C H Hardwick Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2007-08-14 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Matthew T Dyson; Damian Roqueiro; Diana Monsivais; C Mutlu Ercan; Mary Ellen Pavone; David C Brooks; Toshiyuki Kakinuma; Masanori Ono; Nadereh Jafari; Yang Dai; Serdar E Bulun Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 5.917