Literature DB >> 28366554

Comparative study of the calculated risk of radiation-induced cancer after photon- and proton-beam based radiosurgery of liver metastases.

Gracinda Mondlane1, Michael Gubanski2, Pehr A Lind3, Ana Ureba4, Albert Siegbahn4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The potential of proton therapy to improve the sparing of the healthy tissue has been demonstrated in several studies. However, even small doses delivered to the organs at risk (OAR) may induce long-term detriments after radiotherapy. In this study, we investigated the possibility to reduce the risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers with intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), when used for radiosurgery of liver metastases.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients, previously treated for liver metastases with photon-beam based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) were retrospectively planned for radiosurgery with IMPT. A treatment plan comparison was then performed in terms of calculated risk of radiation-induced secondary cancer. The risks were estimated using two distinct models (Dasu et al., 2005; Schneider et al., 2005, 2009). The plans were compared pairwise with a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a significance level of 0.05.
RESULTS: Reduced risks for induction of fatal and other types of cancers were estimated for the IMPT plans (p<0.05) with the Dasu et al. MODEL: Using the Schneider et al. model, lower risks for carcinoma-induction with IMPT were estimated for the skin, lungs, healthy part of the liver, esophagus and the remaining part of the body (p<0.05). The risk of observing sarcomas in the bone was also reduced with IMPT (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that the risks of radiation-induced secondary cancers after radiosurgery of liver metastases may be reduced, if IMPT is used instead of photon-beam based SBRT.
Copyright © 2017 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IMPT; Liver metastases; SBRT; Secondary cancers

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28366554     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  6 in total

Review 1.  Proton beam therapy for gastrointestinal cancers: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Shahed N Badiyan; Christopher L Hallemeier; Steven H Lin; Matthew D Hall; Michael D Chuong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-10

2.  Secondary Malignancy Risk Following Proton vs. X-ray Radiotherapy of Thymic Epithelial Tumors: A Comparative Modeling Study of Thoracic Organ-Specific Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Laila König; Juliane Hörner-Rieber; Matthew Forsthoefel; Peter Haering; Eva Meixner; Tanja Eichkorn; Anna Krämer; Thomas Mielke; Eric Tonndorf-Martini; Matthias F Haefner; Jürgen Debus; Jonathan W Lischalk
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Proton therapy needs further technological development to fulfill the promise of becoming a superior treatment modality (compared to photon therapy).

Authors:  Daniel E Hyer; Xuanfeng Ding; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Proton beam therapy in apneic oxygenation treatment of an unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Yi-Lan Lin
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2018-10-27

5.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for whole pelvis irradiation in prostate cancer: A dosimetric and plan robustness study between photons and protons.

Authors:  Ashley L K Ong; K W Ang; Zubin Master; Sharon M M Wong; Jeffrey K L Tuan
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-03

6.  Secondary Malignancy Risk Following Proton vs. X-ray Treatment of Mediastinal Malignant Lymphoma: A Comparative Modeling Study of Thoracic Organ-Specific Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Laila König; Peter Haering; Clemens Lang; Mona Splinter; Bastian von Nettelbladt; Fabian Weykamp; Philipp Hoegen; Jonathan W Lischalk; Klaus Herfarth; Jürgen Debus; Juliane Hörner-Rieber
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.