Literature DB >> 28365949

Effect and influence factor analysis of intrahepatic Glisson's sheath vascular disconnection approach for anatomical hepatectomy by three-dimensional laparoscope.

Dapeng Qiu1, Hao Zhuang, Feng Han.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects and influence factor analysis of intrahepatic Glisson's sheath vascular disconnection approach for anatomical hepatectomy by three-dimensional (3D) laparoscope.
METHODS: 82 patients with liver cancer were selected and divided into the control group with 45 cases and observation group with 37 cases according to different treatment methods. The control group was subjected to conventional laparotomy or resection under two-dimensional (2D) laparoscope while the observation group was subjected to anatomical hepatectomy by intrahepatic Glisson's sheath vascular disconnection approach under 3D laparoscope, and the therapeutic effects were compared.
RESULTS: The operation time and porta hepatis anatomy time were not significantly different (p>0.05). The amount of bleeding in the observation group was less than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The achievement ratio of the operation in both groups was compared and showed no statistical difference (p=1.00). With a median follow-up time of 26.5 months, the complication occurrence rate in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (p<0.05). Comparison of the survival rate of both groups showed no differences. The multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that the average maximum diameter of tumor and tumor close to porta hepatis were independent risk factors that influenced the operative results of the observation group.
CONCLUSION: Intrahepatic Glisson's sheath vascular disconnection approach by 3D laparoscope for anatomical hepatectomy was superior in terms of safety and effectiveness, and the average maximum diameter of tumor and tumor close to porta hepatis were independent risk factors that influenced the operative results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28365949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J BUON        ISSN: 1107-0625            Impact factor:   2.533


  3 in total

1.  The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Nereo Vettoretto; Nader K Francis; Marco Augusto Bonino; Nathan J Curtis; Daniele Amparore; Simone Arolfo; Manuel Barberio; Luigi Boni; Ronit Brodie; Nicole Bouvy; Elisa Cassinotti; Thomas Carus; Enrico Checcucci; Petra Custers; Michele Diana; Marilou Jansen; Joris Jaspers; Gadi Marom; Kota Momose; Beat P Müller-Stich; Kyokazu Nakajima; Felix Nickel; Silvana Perretta; Francesco Porpiglia; Francisco Sánchez-Margallo; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Marlies Schijven; Gianfranco Silecchia; Roberto Passera; Yoav Mintz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laennec's approach for laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy based on Laennec's capsule.

Authors:  Yue Hu; Jiong Shi; Shaohe Wang; Wenjie Zhang; Xitai Sun; Beicheng Sun; Decai Yu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  3D Versus 4K Display System - Influence of "State-of-the-art"-Display Technique on Surgical Performance (IDOSP-study) in Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Randomized Cross-over Trial.

Authors:  Roger Wahba; Rabi Datta; Jana Bußhoff; Thomas Bruns; Andrea Hedergott; Caroline Gietzelt; Georg Dieplinger; Hans Fuchs; Bernd Morgenstern; Desdemona Möller; Martin Hellmich; Christiane J Bruns; Dirk L Stippel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 13.787

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.