J Daniel Markley1, Shaina Bernard2, Gonzalo Bearman3, Michael P Stevens3. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, MCV Campus, VMI Building, Suite 205, 1000 East Marshall Street, P.O. Box 980049, Richmond, VA, 23298-0049, USA. john.markley@vcuhealth.org. 2. Department of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, 401 North 12th Street, Richmond, VA, 23298-0042, USA. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, MCV Campus, VMI Building, Suite 205, 1000 East Marshall Street, P.O. Box 980049, Richmond, VA, 23298-0049, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Antibiotic de-escalation (ADE) is widely accepted as an integral strategy to curtail the global antibiotic resistance crisis. However, there is significant uncertainty regarding the ideal ADE strategy and its true impact on antibiotic resistance. Rapid diagnostic testing has the potential to enhance ADE strategies. Herein, we aim to discuss the current strategies, controversies, and challenges of ADE in the inpatient setting. RECENT FINDINGS: A consensus definition of ADE remains elusive at this time. Preliminary studies utilizing rapid diagnostic tests including matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF), procalcitonin, and other molecular techniques have demonstrated the potential to support ADE strategies. In the absence of evidence-based, highly specific ADE protocols, the likelihood that individual providers will make consistent, often challenging, decisions to de-escalate antibiotic therapy is low. Antimicrobial stewardship programs should support local physicians with ADE and develop innovative ways to integrate ADE into the broader construct of antimicrobial stewardship programs. The evolving field of rapid diagnostics has significant potential to improve ADE strategies, but more research is needed to fully realize this goal.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Antibiotic de-escalation (ADE) is widely accepted as an integral strategy to curtail the global antibiotic resistance crisis. However, there is significant uncertainty regarding the ideal ADE strategy and its true impact on antibiotic resistance. Rapid diagnostic testing has the potential to enhance ADE strategies. Herein, we aim to discuss the current strategies, controversies, and challenges of ADE in the inpatient setting. RECENT FINDINGS: A consensus definition of ADE remains elusive at this time. Preliminary studies utilizing rapid diagnostic tests including matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF), procalcitonin, and other molecular techniques have demonstrated the potential to support ADE strategies. In the absence of evidence-based, highly specific ADE protocols, the likelihood that individual providers will make consistent, often challenging, decisions to de-escalate antibiotic therapy is low. Antimicrobial stewardship programs should support local physicians with ADE and develop innovative ways to integrate ADE into the broader construct of antimicrobial stewardship programs. The evolving field of rapid diagnostics has significant potential to improve ADE strategies, but more research is needed to fully realize this goal.
Authors: Jens U Jensen; Lars Hein; Bettina Lundgren; Morten H Bestle; Thomas T Mohr; Mads H Andersen; Klaus J Thornberg; Jesper Løken; Morten Steensen; Zoe Fox; Hamid Tousi; Peter Søe-Jensen; Anne Ø Lauritsen; Ditte Strange; Pernille L Petersen; Nanna Reiter; Søren Hestad; Katrin Thormar; Paul Fjeldborg; Kim M Larsen; Niels E Drenck; Christian Ostergaard; Jesper Kjær; Jesper Grarup; Jens D Lundgren Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Tamar F Barlam; Sara E Cosgrove; Lilian M Abbo; Conan MacDougall; Audrey N Schuetz; Edward J Septimus; Arjun Srinivasan; Timothy H Dellit; Yngve T Falck-Ytter; Neil O Fishman; Cindy W Hamilton; Timothy C Jenkins; Pamela A Lipsett; Preeti N Malani; Larissa S May; Gregory J Moran; Melinda M Neuhauser; Jason G Newland; Christopher A Ohl; Matthew H Samore; Susan K Seo; Kavita K Trivedi Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-05-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Katherine K Perez; Randall J Olsen; William L Musick; Patricia L Cernoch; James R Davis; Geoffrey A Land; Leif E Peterson; James M Musser Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: S Schroeder; M Hochreiter; T Koehler; A-M Schweiger; B Bein; F S Keck; T von Spiegel Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2008-11-26 Impact factor: 3.445