OBJECTIVES: Epidemiological studies suggest that cyclothymic disorder is the most prevalent subtype of bipolar disorder (BD). However, it is rarely diagnosed, especially in youth. This may be because it can be difficult to ascertain whether a youth meets diagnostic criteria. Clearer, easy-to-apply criteria could reduce misdiagnosis. The objective oftable this study was to determine whether proposed research diagnostic criteria for cyclothymic disorder (RDCyc), based on DSM-5 criteria, could be quantified and validated in youth. METHODS: Participants from the Longitudinal Assessment of Manic Symptoms (LAMS) study were recruited based on symptoms of mania and followed prospectively. RDCyc criteria were: 1) At least one core symptom each of mania and depression; 2) one additional symptom of mania and of depression; 3) persistence over two consecutive six-month periods, and 4) impairment. Exclusionary criteria were having a [hypo]manic or depressive episode. Outcomes at the two-year follow-up were compared between RDCyc youth and other diagnostic groups (BD I/II, BD NOS/non-RDCyc cyclothymic disorder, disruptive behavior disorders [DBD], depression). RESULTS: Thirty-seven youth met RDCyc criteria. There were no consistent differences between the RDCyc youth and youth with other BD subtypes (ps=0.001-0.960, with all-but-one p value >0.02). RDCyc youth had higher depression (p<0.0005) and mania scores (p=0.001), lower functioning (p=0.012), and higher suicide risk than DBD youth (p=0.001). They had higher mania scores than depressed youth (p.018). LIMITATIONS: The majority of youth in the sample were recruited due to elevated symptoms of mania, which may limit the generalizability of the results. Youth were followed for two years, which may not be long enough to determine whether or not they will eventually develop a manic or depressive episode. CONCLUSIONS: Applying RDCyc criteria identified youth who were similar to others with BD and were more impaired than those with DBD. Using these criteria could reduce misdiagnosis and increase our understanding of this prevalent, but largely ignored, diagnosis.
OBJECTIVES: Epidemiological studies suggest that cyclothymic disorder is the most prevalent subtype of bipolar disorder (BD). However, it is rarely diagnosed, especially in youth. This may be because it can be difficult to ascertain whether a youth meets diagnostic criteria. Clearer, easy-to-apply criteria could reduce misdiagnosis. The objective oftable this study was to determine whether proposed research diagnostic criteria for cyclothymic disorder (RDCyc), based on DSM-5 criteria, could be quantified and validated in youth. METHODS:Participants from the Longitudinal Assessment of Manic Symptoms (LAMS) study were recruited based on symptoms of mania and followed prospectively. RDCyc criteria were: 1) At least one core symptom each of mania and depression; 2) one additional symptom of mania and of depression; 3) persistence over two consecutive six-month periods, and 4) impairment. Exclusionary criteria were having a [hypo]manic or depressive episode. Outcomes at the two-year follow-up were compared between RDCyc youth and other diagnostic groups (BD I/II, BD NOS/non-RDCyc cyclothymic disorder, disruptive behavior disorders [DBD], depression). RESULTS: Thirty-seven youth met RDCyc criteria. There were no consistent differences between the RDCyc youth and youth with other BD subtypes (ps=0.001-0.960, with all-but-one p value >0.02). RDCyc youth had higher depression (p<0.0005) and mania scores (p=0.001), lower functioning (p=0.012), and higher suicide risk than DBD youth (p=0.001). They had higher mania scores than depressed youth (p.018). LIMITATIONS: The majority of youth in the sample were recruited due to elevated symptoms of mania, which may limit the generalizability of the results. Youth were followed for two years, which may not be long enough to determine whether or not they will eventually develop a manic or depressive episode. CONCLUSIONS: Applying RDCyc criteria identified youth who were similar to others with BD and were more impaired than those with DBD. Using these criteria could reduce misdiagnosis and increase our understanding of this prevalent, but largely ignored, diagnosis.
Authors: Sarah McCue Horwitz; Christine A Demeter; Maria E Pagano; Eric A Youngstrom; Mary A Fristad; L Eugene Arnold; Boris Birmaher; Mary Kay Gill; David Axelson; Robert A Kowatch; Thomas W Frazier; Robert L Findling Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: David A Axelson; Boris Birmaher; Michael A Strober; Benjamin I Goldstein; Wonho Ha; Mary Kay Gill; Tina R Goldstein; Shirley Yen; Heather Hower; Jeffrey I Hunt; Fangzi Liao; Satish Iyengar; Daniel Dickstein; Eunice Kim; Neal D Ryan; Erica Frankel; Martin B Keller Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Robert L Findling; Booil Jo; Thomas W Frazier; Eric A Youngstrom; Christine A Demeter; Mary A Fristad; Boris Birmaher; Robert A Kowatch; Eugene Arnold; David A Axelson; Neal Ryan; Jessica C Hauser; Daniel J Brace; Linda E Marsh; Mary Kay Gill; Judith Depew; Brieana M Rowles; Sarah McCue Horwitz Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Boris Birmaher; Mary Kay Gill; David A Axelson; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina R Goldstein; Haifeng Yu; Fangzi Liao; Satish Iyengar; Rasim S Diler; Michael Strober; Heather Hower; Shirley Yen; Jeffrey Hunt; John A Merranko; Neal D Ryan; Martin B Keller Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: S Nassir Ghaemi; Michael Bauer; Frederick Cassidy; Gin S Malhi; Philip Mitchell; James Phelps; Eduard Vieta; Eric Youngstrom Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Isabella Pacchiarotti; David J Bond; Ross J Baldessarini; Willem A Nolen; Heinz Grunze; Rasmus W Licht; Robert M Post; Michael Berk; Guy M Goodwin; Gary S Sachs; Leonardo Tondo; Robert L Findling; Eric A Youngstrom; Mauricio Tohen; Juan Undurraga; Ana González-Pinto; Joseph F Goldberg; Ayşegül Yildiz; Lori L Altshuler; Joseph R Calabrese; Philip B Mitchell; Michael E Thase; Athanasios Koukopoulos; Francesc Colom; Mark A Frye; Gin S Malhi; Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Gustavo Vázquez; Roy H Perlis; Terence A Ketter; Frederick Cassidy; Hagop Akiskal; Jean-Michel Azorin; Marc Valentí; Diego Hidalgo Mazzei; Beny Lafer; Tadafumi Kato; Lorenzo Mazzarini; Anabel Martínez-Aran; Gordon Parker; Daniel Souery; Ayşegül Ozerdem; Susan L McElroy; Paolo Girardi; Michael Bauer; Lakshmi N Yatham; Carlos A Zarate; Andrew A Nierenberg; Boris Birmaher; Shigenobu Kanba; Rif S El-Mallakh; Alessandro Serretti; Zoltan Rihmer; Allan H Young; Georgios D Kotzalidis; Glenda M MacQueen; Charles L Bowden; S Nassir Ghaemi; Carlos Lopez-Jaramillo; Janusz Rybakowski; Kyooseob Ha; Giulio Perugi; Siegfried Kasper; Jay D Amsterdam; Robert M Hirschfeld; Flávio Kapczinski; Eduard Vieta Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Ziv E Bell; Mary A Fristad; Eric A Youngstrom; L Eugene Arnold; Theodore P Beauchaine Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Eric A Youngstrom; Andrea S Young; Katherine Van Eck; Ekaterina Stepanova; Joshua A Langfus; Gabrielle Carlson; Robert L Findling Journal: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Date: 2021-06-14
Authors: Ralph Kupka; Anne Duffy; Jan Scott; Jorge Almeida; Vicent Balanzá-Martínez; Boris Birmaher; David J Bond; Elisa Brietzke; Ines Chendo; Benicio N Frey; Iria Grande; Danella Hafeman; Tomas Hajek; Manon Hillegers; Marcia Kauer-Sant'Anna; Rodrigo B Mansur; Afra van der Markt; Robert Post; Mauricio Tohen; Hailey Tremain; Gustavo Vazquez; Eduard Vieta; Lakshmi N Yatham; Michael Berk; Martin Alda; Flávio Kapczinski Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2021-07-23 Impact factor: 5.345