Literature DB >> 28365279

Preliminary evidence of sex differences in behavioral and neural responses to palatable food reward in rats.

Elaine B Sinclair1, Britny A Hildebrandt2, Kristen M Culbert3, Kelly L Klump2, Cheryl L Sisk4.   

Abstract

The female bias in eating disorder prevalence is the largest in all of psychiatry. Binge eating on palatable food (PF) is a core, maladaptive symptom that cuts across all major types of eating disorders and can be studied via animal models. Using an individual differences rat model of binge eating that identifies binge eating prone (BEP) and binge eating resistant (BER) phenotypes, we previously showed that, compared with males, females consume more PF and are more likely to be classified as BEP. One potential explanation for this sex difference is that PF is inherently more rewarding to females, leading to higher rates of binge eating. Here we tested the hypothesis that females have more robust behavioral and neural responses to PF reward than males. Adult male (N=18) and female (N=17) Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to the Conditioned Place Preference paradigm using PF as the unconditioned stimulus. Select males (N=9) and females (N=9) were video-recorded during three of the PF-paired conditioning sessions to score feeding behavior. Following CPP, 13 male and 12 female rats were exposed to PF just prior to sacrifice to induce expression of the neural activation marker Fos, and Fos expression was quantified in mesocorticolimbic, hypothalamic, and amygdalar circuits. In the CPP paradigm, females displayed a more robust shift in preference for the chamber paired with PF compared with males, and behavioral analyses revealed that average duration of individual feeding bouts during pairing sessions was longer in females than in males. Fos expression was significantly higher in females vs. males in select regions of the mesocorticolimbic reward circuit, with no sex differences in hypothalamic or amygdalar regions. These results provide initial evidence that PF may be more rewarding to females than to males, possibly due to heightened responsiveness of neural substrates that mediate the hedonic and motivational responses to PF, which in part, may underlie sex differences in binge eating proneness.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binge eating; Conditioned place preference; Food reward; Mesocorticolimbic reward circuit

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28365279     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  17 in total

Review 1.  Neuroendocrinology of reward in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: Beyond leptin and ghrelin.

Authors:  Laura A Berner; Tiffany A Brown; Jason M Lavender; Emily Lopez; Christina E Wierenga; Walter H Kaye
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 2.  Estradiol and the control of feeding behavior.

Authors:  H M Rivera; T L Stincic
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 3.  Sexes on the brain: Sex as multiple biological variables in the neuronal control of feeding.

Authors:  Megan G Massa; Stephanie M Correa
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.187

4.  Sex differences in motivated behaviors in animal models.

Authors:  Zhimin Song; Manu Kalyani; Jill B Becker
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-05-03

5.  Effects of chronic stress on reinstatement of palatable food seeking: Sex differences and relationship to trait anxiety.

Authors:  Kevin T Ball; Olivia Best; Erin Hagan; Claire Pressimone; Lindsay Tosh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-04-04

6.  Hedonic Eating: Sex Differences and Characterization of Orexin Activation and Signaling.

Authors:  Laura Buczek; Jennifer Migliaccio; Gorica D Petrovich
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  A virtual issue highlighting animal studies of eating disorders as valuable tools for examining neurobiological underpinnings and treatment of eating disorders.

Authors:  Natasha Fowler; Kelly L Klump
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.861

8.  Moderate Prenatal Alcohol Exposure Impairs Visual-Spatial Discrimination in a Sex-Specific Manner: Effects of Testing Order and Difficulty on Learning Performance.

Authors:  Johnny A Kenton; Victoria K Castillo; Penelope E Kehrer; Jonathan L Brigman
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 9.  A Narrative Review of Sex Differences in Eating Disorders: Is There a Biological Basis?

Authors:  Kristen M Culbert; Cheryl L Sisk; Kelly L Klump
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  Intermittent, extended access to preferred food leads to escalated food reinforcement and cyclic whole-body metabolism in rats: Sex differences and individual vulnerability.

Authors:  Samantha R Spierling; Alison D Kreisler; Casey A Williams; Savannah Y Fang; Sarah N Pucci; Kelsey T Kines; Eric P Zorrilla
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.