Joseph T Church1, Anne C Kim2, Kimberly M Erickson3, Ankur Rana4, Robert Drongowski5, Ronald B Hirschl5, Robert H Bartlett5, George B Mychaliska5. 1. Section of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Michigan Medical School and The C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: jchurc@med.umich.edu. 2. Department of Pediatric Surgery-General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH. 3. Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of North Carolina Department of Surgery, Chapel Hill, NC. 4. Austin Pediatric Surgery, Dell Children's Medical Center, Austin, TX. 5. Section of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Michigan Medical School and The C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is usually reserved for infants ≥34weeks estimated gestational age (EGA) owing to concerns about increased mortality and incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). We sought to characterize survival, rates of ICH, and complications in <34week EGA neonates placed on ECLS. METHODS: 752 neonates of EGA 29-34weeks were identified in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry (1976-2008). Data analyzed included birthweight, survival, pre-ECLS conditions, ventilatory parameters and complications (including ICH and other neurological outcomes). Data were compared using t-test, Chi-square and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: When compared to survival rates of 34week EGA neonates (58%), survival was statistically different for 29-33week EGA (48%, p=0.05). No significant difference in ICH incidence was seen between the 29-33week and 34week groups (21% vs. 17%, respectively), but a significant difference was seen in the incidence of cerebral infarct between groups (22% for 29-33weeks vs. 16% for 34weeks; p=0.03). ICH and survival did not correlate with EGA during logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Though rates of survival and cerebral infarction were worse at 29-33weeks EGA compared with 34weeks, these differences were modest and may be clinically acceptable. This suggests that EGA<34weeks may not be an absolute contraindication to use of ECLS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is usually reserved for infants ≥34weeks estimated gestational age (EGA) owing to concerns about increased mortality and incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). We sought to characterize survival, rates of ICH, and complications in <34week EGA neonates placed on ECLS. METHODS: 752 neonates of EGA 29-34weeks were identified in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry (1976-2008). Data analyzed included birthweight, survival, pre-ECLS conditions, ventilatory parameters and complications (including ICH and other neurological outcomes). Data were compared using t-test, Chi-square and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: When compared to survival rates of 34week EGA neonates (58%), survival was statistically different for 29-33week EGA (48%, p=0.05). No significant difference in ICH incidence was seen between the 29-33week and 34week groups (21% vs. 17%, respectively), but a significant difference was seen in the incidence of cerebral infarct between groups (22% for 29-33weeks vs. 16% for 34weeks; p=0.03). ICH and survival did not correlate with EGA during logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Though rates of survival and cerebral infarction were worse at 29-33weeks EGA compared with 34weeks, these differences were modest and may be clinically acceptable. This suggests that EGA<34weeks may not be an absolute contraindication to use of ECLS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.