Literature DB >> 28365007

Future remnant liver function as predictive factor for the hypertrophy response after portal vein embolization.

Kasia P Cieslak1, Floor Huisman1, Thomas Bais1, Roelof J Bennink2, Krijn P van Lienden2, Joanne Verheij3, Marc G Besselink1, Olivier R C Busch1, Thomas M van Gulik4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative portal vein embolization is widely used to increase the future remnant liver. Identification of nonresponders to portal vein embolization is essential because these patients may benefit from associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), which induces a more powerful hypertrophy response. 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy is a quantitative method for assessment of future remnant liver function with a calculated cutoff value for the prediction of postoperative liver failure. The aim of this study was to analyze future remnant liver function before portal vein embolization to predict sufficient functional hypertrophy response after portal vein embolization.
METHODS: Sixty-three patients who underwent preoperative portal vein embolization and computed tomography imaging were included. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy was performed to determine pre-portal vein embolization and post-portal vein embolization future remnant liver function. Receiver operator characteristic analysis of pre-portal vein embolization future remnant liver function was performed to identify patients who would meet the post-portal vein embolization cutoff value for sufficient function (ie, 2.7%/min/m2).
RESULTS: Mean pre-portal vein embolization future remnant liver function was 1.80% ± 0.45%/min/m2 and increased to 2.89% ± 0.97%/min/m2 post-portal vein embolization. Receiver operator characteristic analysis in 33 patients who did not receive chemotherapy revealed that a pre-portal vein embolization future remnant liver function of ≥1.72%/min/m2 was able to identify patients who would meet the safe future remnant liver function cutoff value 3 weeks after portal vein embolization (area under the curve = 0.820). The predictive value was less pronounced in 30 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (area under the curve = 0.618). A total of 45 of 63 patients underwent liver resection, of whom 5 of 45 developed postoperative liver failure; 4 of 5 patients had a post-portal vein embolization future remnant liver function below the cutoff value for safe resection.
CONCLUSION: When selecting patients for portal vein embolization, future remnant liver function assessed with hepatobiliary scintigraphy can be used as a predictor of insufficient functional hypertrophy after portal vein embolization, especially in nonchemotherapy patients. These patients are potential candidates for ALPPS.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28365007     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  11 in total

1.  Hepatic function assessment to predict post-hepatectomy liver failure: what can we trust? A systematic review.

Authors:  Federico Tomassini; Mariano C Giglio; Giuseppe De Simone; Roberto Montalti; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-08-04

2.  Liver venous deprivation versus portal vein embolization before major hepatectomy: future liver remnant volumetric and functional changes.

Authors:  Boris Guiu; François Quenet; Fabrizio Panaro; Lauranne Piron; Christophe Cassinotto; Astrid Herrerro; François-Régis Souche; Margaux Hermida; Marie-Ange Pierredon-Foulongne; Ali Belgour; Serge Aho-Glele; Emmanuel Deshayes
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 3.  ICG Clearance Test and 99mTc-GSA SPECT/CT Fusion Images.

Authors:  Yuji Iimuro
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-11-22

Review 4.  Current Modalities for the Assessment of Future Remnant Liver Function.

Authors:  Fadi Rassam; Pim B Olthof; Roelof J Bennink; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-11-30

5.  Primary tumor resection improves survival in patients with multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on a population study.

Authors:  Linlin Yin; Si Zhao; Hanlong Zhu; Guozhong Ji; Xiuhua Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The role of hepatobiliary scintigraphy combined with spect/ct in predicting severity of liver failure before major hepatectomy: a single-center pilot study.

Authors:  Matteo Serenari; Chiara Bonatti; Lucia Zanoni; Giuliano Peta; Elena Tabacchi; Alessandro Cucchetti; Matteo Ravaioli; Cinzia Pettinato; Alberto Bagni; Antonio Siniscalchi; Antonietta D'Errico; Rita Golfieri; Stefano Fanti; Matteo Cescon
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-11-02

Review 7.  Challenges and Opportunities for Treating Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nikolaos Serifis; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Daniel J Cloonan; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Hepat Med       Date:  2021-11-02

Review 8.  A Comparison of Pitfalls after ALPPS Stage 1 or Portal Vein Embolization in Small-for-Size Setting Hepatectomies.

Authors:  Andreas A Schnitzbauer
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-12-04

Review 9.  Liver Functional Volumetry by Tc-99m Mebrofenin Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy before Major Liver Resection: A Game Changer.

Authors:  Manoj Gupta; Partha Sarathi Choudhury; Shivendra Singh; Dibyamohan Hazarika
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

Review 10.  Colorectal liver metastases: Current management and future perspectives.

Authors:  Jack Martin; Angelica Petrillo; Elizabeth C Smyth; Nadeem Shaida; Samir Khwaja; H K Cheow; Adam Duckworth; Paula Heister; Raaj Praseedom; Asif Jah; Anita Balakrishnan; Simon Harper; Siong Liau; Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis; Emmanuel Huguet
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.