Literature DB >> 28364444

Acute type A dissection in octogenarians: does emergency surgery impact in-hospital outcome or long-term survival?

Julia Dumfarth1,2, Sven Peterss2, Maximilian Luehr3, Christian D Etz3, Thomas Schachner1, Markus Kofler1, Bulat A Ziganshin2,4, Hanno Ulmer5, Michael Grimm1, John A Elefteriades2, Friedrich W Mohr3.   

Abstract

Objectives: Surgical therapy for acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) in octogenarians carries high morbidity and mortality. The role of isolated medical treatment in this setting is controversial. The aim of this study is to determine whether risk of surgery for AADA outweighs risk of death from medical treatment only.
Methods: From 2002 to 2015, 90 consecutive octogenarians (mean age, 83.5 ± 3 years) were treated for AADA at three institutions: 67 patients underwent surgery, 23 patients received medical treatment. Analysis of early and late outcome was performed.
Results: Patients in the medical treatment group were significantly older than in the surgical group (84.9 ± 3.7 vs 83 ± 2.5 years, P  = 0.008) and in a more critical state. In patients undergoing surgical repair, perioperative mortality was 14.9% ( n  = 10). Rate of prolonged ventilation (63.2% vs 5.9%; P  < 0.001) and renal failure (35.1% vs 5.9%, P  = 0.029) was significantly higher in the surgical group. Thirty-day survival was impaired in the medical treatment group (34.8% vs 61.2% in the surgical group; P  = 0.032). Coronary artery disease (OR 3.95, 95% CI 1.16-13.49; P  = 0.029) and complicated dissections (OR 5.28, 95% CI 1.48-18.88; P  = 0.010)-composite variable of preoperative resuscitation, neurological injury and malperfusion-emerged as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in the surgical group. There was no difference in long-term survival. Conclusions: Emergency surgery for AADA in octogenarians is associated with relatively high intraoperative mortality and may reasonably be avoided in patient with complicated presentation. Despite better immediate survival after surgery, long-term survival does not differ between medical and surgical patients, reflecting the extremely advanced point in life cycle octogenarians.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical treatment ; Octogenarians ; Surgery ; Survival benefit; Type A aortic dissection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28364444     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  5 in total

Review 1.  Is Exercise Blood Pressure Putting the Brake on Exercise Rehabilitation after Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery?

Authors:  Na Zhou; Warner M Mampuya; Marie-Christine Iliou
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Initial experience with the new type A arch dissection stent: restoration of supra-aortic vessel perfusion.

Authors:  Matteo Montagner; Markus Kofler; Roland Heck; Semih Buz; Christoph Starck; Stephan Kurz; Volkmar Falk; Jörg Kempfert
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26

3.  Endovascular treatment of the dissected proximal aortic arch: a systematic review.

Authors:  Changtian Wang; Ludwig Karl von Segesser; Denis Berdajs; Enrico Ferrari
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-29

4.  The future of stenting in patients with type A aortic dissection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amer Harky; Jeremy Chan; Beverly MacCarthy-Ofosu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 5.  Outcomes of surgery for acute type A dissection in octogenarians versus non-octogenarians: a systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Aditya Eranki; Michael Merakis; Michael L Williams; Campbell D Flynn; Claudia Villanueva; Ashley Wilson-Smith; Yangsin Lee; Ross Mejia
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.522

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.