Literature DB >> 28364295

Objective assessment of visual pursuit in patients with disorders of consciousness: an exploratory study.

Sarah Wannez1,2, Thomas Hoyoux3, Thomas Langohr3, Olivier Bodart4,5, Charlotte Martial4,5, Jérôme Wertz6, Camille Chatelle4,5,7,8, Jacques G Verly3, Steven Laureys4,5.   

Abstract

Visual pursuit is a key marker of residual consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC). Currently, its assessment relies on subjective clinical decisions. In this study, we explore the variability of such clinical assessments, and present an easy-to-use device composed of cameras and video processing algorithms that could help the clinician to improve the detection of visual pursuit in a clinical context. Visual pursuit was assessed by an experienced research neuropsychologist on 31 patients with DOC and on 23 healthy subjects, while the device was used to simultaneously record videos of both one eye and the mirror. These videos were then scored by three researchers: the experienced research neuropsychologist who did the clinical assessment, another experienced research neuropsychologist, and a neurologist. For each video, a consensus was decided between the three persons, and used as the gold standard of the presence or absence of visual pursuit. Almost 10% of the patients were misclassified at the bedside according to their consensus. An automatic classifier analyzed eye and mirror trajectories, and was able to identify patients and healthy subjects with visual pursuit, in total agreement with the consensus on video. In conclusion, our device can be used easily in patients with DOC while respecting the current guidelines of visual pursuit assessment. Our results suggest that our material and our classification method can identify patients with visual pursuit, as well as the three researchers based on video recordings can.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic detection; Behavioral assessment; Disorders of consciousness; Minimally conscious state; Visual pursuit

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28364295     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-017-8469-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  23 in total

1.  Cerebral processing of auditory and noxious stimuli in severely brain injured patients: differences between VS and MCS.

Authors:  Mélanie Boly; Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville; Philippe Peigneux; Bernard Lambermont; François Damas; André Luxen; Maurice Lamy; Gustave Moonen; Pierre Maquet; Steven Laureys
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Can electromyography objectively detect voluntary movement in disorders of consciousness?

Authors:  T A Bekinschtein; M R Coleman; J Niklison; J D Pickard; F F Manes
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Assessment of visual pursuit in post-comatose states: use a mirror.

Authors:  A Vanhaudenhuyse; C Schnakers; S Brédart; S Laureys
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Diagnostic precision of PET imaging and functional MRI in disorders of consciousness: a clinical validation study.

Authors:  Johan Stender; Olivia Gosseries; Marie-Aurélie Bruno; Vanessa Charland-Verville; Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse; Athena Demertzi; Camille Chatelle; Marie Thonnard; Aurore Thibaut; Lizette Heine; Andrea Soddu; Mélanie Boly; Caroline Schnakers; Albert Gjedde; Steven Laureys
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Ronald T Seel; Mark Sherer; John Whyte; Douglas I Katz; Joseph T Giacino; Amy M Rosenbaum; Flora M Hammond; Kathleen Kalmar; Theresa Louise-Bender Pape; Ross Zafonte; Rosette C Biester; Darryl Kaelin; Jacob Kean; Nathan Zasler
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 6.  The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Joseph T Giacino; S Ashwal; N Childs; R Cranford; B Jennett; D I Katz; J P Kelly; J H Rosenberg; J Whyte; R D Zafonte; N D Zasler
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-02-12       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Detection of visual pursuit in patients in minimally conscious state: a matter of stimuli and visual plane?

Authors:  Marie Thonnard; Sarah Wannez; Shannan Keen; Serge Brédart; Marie-Aurélie Bruno; Olivia Gosseries; Athena Demertzi; Aurore Thibaut; Camille Chatelle; Vanessa Charland-Verville; Lizette Heine; Dina Habbal; Steven Laureys; Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Different beliefs about pain perception in the vegetative and minimally conscious states: a European survey of medical and paramedical professionals.

Authors:  A Demertzi; C Schnakers; D Ledoux; C Chatelle; M-A Bruno; A Vanhaudenhuyse; M Boly; G Moonen; S Laureys
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Longitudinal Assessment of Clinical Signs of Recovery in Patients with Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome after Traumatic or Nontraumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Sergio Bagnato; Cristina Boccagni; Antonino Sant'Angelo; Alexander A Fingelkurts; Andrew A Fingelkurts; Giuseppe Galardi
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Why use a mirror to assess visual pursuit in prolonged disorders of consciousness? Evidence from healthy control participants.

Authors:  Damian Cruse; Marco Fattizzo; Adrian M Owen; Davinia Fernández-Espejo
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.474

View more
  2 in total

1.  Functional MRI Motor Imagery Tasks to Detect Command Following in Traumatic Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Yelena G Bodien; Joseph T Giacino; Brian L Edlow
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.003

2.  Public perception of the vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a crowdsourced study.

Authors:  Daniel Kondziella; Man Cheung Cheung; Anirban Dutta
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.