Adina Dreier-Wolfgramm1, Bernhard Michalowsky2, Mary Guerriero Austrom3, Marjolein A van der Marck4, Steve Iliffe5, Catherine Alder6, Horst Christian Vollmar7,8, Jochen René Thyrian2, Diana Wucherer2, Ina Zwingmann2, Wolfgang Hoffmann9,2. 1. Institute for Community Medicine, Dept. Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. adina.dreier@uni-greifswald.de. 2. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Germany. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Indiana University Center for Aging Research (IU-CAR), Indiana University School of Medicine (IUSM), Indianapolis, USA. 4. Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Geriatric Medicine/Radboudumc Alzheimer Centre, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands. 5. Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, UK. 6. USA Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, USA. 7. Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany. 8. Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany. 9. Institute for Community Medicine, Dept. Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dementia is one of the most prevalent diseases in the older population. Various dementia care models have been developed to address patient's healthcare needs. They can be described as "collaborative care" or "person-centered care". Referring to the needs of the workforce working with persons with dementia, a key element is the use of interprofessional education (IPE). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to describe different international collaborative care models to define a minimum standard of healthcare professions for collaborative dementia care in primary care. This helps to identify requirements for IPE to optimize care of people with dementia and to support informal caregivers in the future. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this article six dementia care models from 4 different countries (Germany, USA, UK and Netherlands) are described and compared regarding aims, interventions and healthcare professionals involved. RESULTS: Care teams are minimally comprised of general practitioners or primary care providers, nurses, and social workers. Additional healthcare disciplines may be involved for specific interventions. Mostly, care team members received specific training but such training did not necessarily incorporate the IPE approach. To ensure successful collaboration of professions, IPE training programs should at least consist of the following core topics: (1) early diagnosis, (2) postdiagnostic support, (3) advanced care planning for patients and caregivers and (4) effective collaborative care. CONCLUSION: The IPE programs for dementia should be expanded and must be widely implemented in order to assess the impact on collaborative practice. This study will provide the knowledge base for structuring IPE trainings developing educational agendas and adapting existing guidelines to improve collaborative dementia care in the future.
BACKGROUND:Dementia is one of the most prevalent diseases in the older population. Various dementia care models have been developed to address patient's healthcare needs. They can be described as "collaborative care" or "person-centered care". Referring to the needs of the workforce working with persons with dementia, a key element is the use of interprofessional education (IPE). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to describe different international collaborative care models to define a minimum standard of healthcare professions for collaborative dementia care in primary care. This helps to identify requirements for IPE to optimize care of people with dementia and to support informal caregivers in the future. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this article six dementia care models from 4 different countries (Germany, USA, UK and Netherlands) are described and compared regarding aims, interventions and healthcare professionals involved. RESULTS: Care teams are minimally comprised of general practitioners or primary care providers, nurses, and social workers. Additional healthcare disciplines may be involved for specific interventions. Mostly, care team members received specific training but such training did not necessarily incorporate the IPE approach. To ensure successful collaboration of professions, IPE training programs should at least consist of the following core topics: (1) early diagnosis, (2) postdiagnostic support, (3) advanced care planning for patients and caregivers and (4) effective collaborative care. CONCLUSION: The IPE programs for dementia should be expanded and must be widely implemented in order to assess the impact on collaborative practice. This study will provide the knowledge base for structuring IPE trainings developing educational agendas and adapting existing guidelines to improve collaborative dementia care in the future.
Entities:
Keywords:
Dementia; Interdisciplinary communication; Interprofessional education; Patient care planning; Primary care
Authors: Michael A LaMantia; Catherine A Alder; Christopher M Callahan; Sujuan Gao; Dustin D French; Mary G Austrom; Karim Boustany; Lee Livin; Bharath Bynagari; Malaz A Boustani Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Stephen Turner; Steve Iliffe; Murna Downs; Jane Wilcock; Michelle Bryans; Enid Levin; John Keady; Ronan O'Carroll Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2004-07-22 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Jane Wilcock; Priya Jain; Mark Griffin; Ingela Thuné-Boyle; Frances Lefford; David Rapp; Steve Iliffe Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Steve Iliffe; Amy Waugh; Marie Poole; Claire Bamford; Katie Brittain; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Chris Fox; Cornelius Katona; Gill Livingston; Jill Manthorpe; Nick Steen; Barbara Stephens; Vanessa Hogan; Louise Robinson Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Deborah E Barnes; Jing Zhou; Rod L Walker; Eric B Larson; Sei J Lee; W John Boscardin; Zachary A Marcum; Sascha Dublin Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Quincy M Samus; Betty Smith Black; Diane Bovenkamp; Michael Buckley; Christopher Callahan; Karen Davis; Laura N Gitlin; Nancy Hodgson; Deirdre Johnston; Helen C Kales; Michele Karel; John Jay Kenney; Shari M Ling; Maï Panchal; Melissa Reuland; Amber Willink; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Anke Richters; Minke S Nieuwboer; Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Rene J F Melis; Marieke Perry; Marjolein A van der Marck Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andreas Fellgiebel; Erik Farin; Isabella Bablok; Harald Binder; Dominikus Stelzer; Klaus Kaier; Erika Graf; Julian Wangler; Michael Jansky; Michael Löhr; Michael Schulz; Marie Kockläuner; Katharina Geschke; Alexandra Wuttke-Linnemann Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Fabian Kleinke; Bernhard Michalowsky; Anika Rädke; Moritz Platen; Franka Mühlichen; Annelie Scharf; Wiebke Mohr; Peter Penndorf; Thomas Bahls; Neeltje van den Berg; Wolfgang Hoffmann Journal: Trials Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Conceição Balsinha; Steve Iliffe; Sónia Dias; Alexandre Freitas; Filipa F Barreiros; Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Date: 2022-02-18 Impact factor: 1.458