Literature DB >> 28363123

The implications of shedder status and background DNA on direct and secondary transfer in an attack scenario.

Ane Elida Fonneløp1, Merete Ramse2, Thore Egeland3, Peter Gill4.   

Abstract

In court questions are often raised related to how trace DNA was deposited, directly during the crime or innocently for instance by secondary transfer. It is therefore of interest to have knowledge of the probability of transfer or secondary transfer in different situations. Factors that could influence transfer probabilities are background DNA and the shedder status of the involved persons. In this study, we have classified participants as high or low DNA shedders. We observed DNA transfer in a simulated attack scenario, and demonstrated that shedder status has a significant influence of transfer rates. We have examined the background DNA in samples from T-shirts worn in an area with frequent human traffic and detected multiple contributors. We further demonstrated that DNA from co-workers of a T-shirt wearer can be secondarily transferred from the environment and detected in samples, and that the composition of background DNA is correlated with the shedder status of the wearer. Finally, we have illustrated the inference with the results of transfer probabilities and a fictive case with the use of a Bayesian network.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Background DNA; Forensic; Shedder status; Touch DNA; Transfer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28363123     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  8 in total

1.  "I've never been at the crime scene!" - gloves as carriers for secondary DNA transfer.

Authors:  Katrin Tanzhaus; Marie-Therese Reiß; Tom Zaspel
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Impact of several wearers on the persistence of DNA on clothes-a study with experimental scenarios.

Authors:  Micaela Poetsch; Manuel Pfeifer; Helen Konrad; Thomas Bajanowski; Janine Helmus
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 3.  The diversity of shedder tests and a novel factor that affects DNA transfer.

Authors:  Max Schwender; Malte Bamberg; Lisa Dierig; Sebastian N Kunz; Peter Wiegand
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Evidence Collection and Analysis for Touch Deoxyribonucleic Acid in Groping and Sexual Assault Cases.

Authors:  Julie L Valentine; Paige Presler-Jur; Heather Mills; Suzanne Miles
Journal:  J Forensic Nurs       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 1.175

5.  Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: An experimental study.

Authors:  Francesco Sessa; Monica Salerno; Giuseppe Bertozzi; Giovanni Messina; Pietrantonio Ricci; Caterina Ledda; Venerando Rapisarda; Santina Cantatore; Emanuela Turillazzi; Cristoforo Pomara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.

Authors:  John M Butler; Sheila Willis
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 7.  DNA Transfer in Forensic Science: Recent Progress towards Meeting Challenges.

Authors:  Roland A H van Oorschot; Georgina E Meakin; Bas Kokshoorn; Mariya Goray; Bianca Szkuta
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Who Packed the Drugs? Application of Bayesian Networks to Address Questions of DNA Transfer, Persistence, and Recovery from Plastic Bags and Tape.

Authors:  Ane Elida Fonneløp; Sara Faria; Gnanagowry Shanthan; Peter Gill
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.096

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.