Literature DB >> 28362722

Prokaryote genome fluidity is dependent on effective population size.

Nadia Andrea Andreani1,2, Elze Hesse3, Michiel Vos2.   

Abstract

Many prokaryote species are known to have fluid genomes, with different strains varying markedly in accessory gene content through the combined action of gene loss, gene gain via lateral transfer, as well as gene duplication. However, the evolutionary forces determining genome fluidity are not yet well understood. We here for the first time systematically analyse the degree to which this distinctive genomic feature differs between bacterial species. We find that genome fluidity is positively correlated with synonymous nucleotide diversity of the core genome, a measure of effective population size Ne. No effects of genome size, phylogeny or homologous recombination rate on genome fluidity were found. Our findings are consistent with a scenario where accessory gene content turnover is for a large part dictated by neutral evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28362722      PMCID: PMC5520154          DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2017.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


Results and discussion

Many bacterial species have been shown to exhibit extensive variation in gene repertoires, where a set of core genes shared by all strains are supplemented with a set of accessory genes that are only present in a subset of strains (Ochman ; Gogarten ; Tettelin ). Although accessory genome analyses are routinely performed in prokaryote genomics studies, whether certain genome characteristics are associated with particularly low or high genome fluidity has not been systematically tested. We here make use of the increasing availability of whole-genome sequences to, for the first time, perform a meta-analysis to (1) gauge the extent to which genome fluidity varies among different species and (2) test which genome characteristics best explain genome fluidity. Methods to quantify pan-genome diversity are generally sensitive to the absence of rare accessory genes from genome samples. We therefore use the φ measure of genome fluidity that has been shown to be robust to sample size (Kislyuk ) (Supplementary Methods). This measure of genomic fluidity is defined as the ratio of unique gene families to the sum of gene families in pairs of genomes averaged over randomly chosen genome pairs from within a group of sampled genomes. Because it is vital to reliably score gene presence/absence and most available genomes are not sequenced to completion, we first verified that good quality (<150 contigs) non-closed genomes resulted in fluidity estimates comparable to those based on closed genomes (linear regression, R2=0.70, P<0.001; Supplementary Figure S1). Genome fluidity could be calculated for 90 free-living species for which five or more genomic data sets were available (3 archaea and 87 bacteria belonging to 15 major taxonomic groups, Supplementary Table S1). Only a single species was selected per genus to minimize phylogenetic bias. As estimates for individual species are dependent on genome selection and to a degree on the specifics of bioinformatics processing, they are not to be taken as absolutes and we will refrain from highlighting individual species, analysing broad patterns only. Genome fluidity φ was plotted against synonymous nucleotide diversity of the core genome (πsyn) on a natural log scale for all species (Figure 1), which showed a significant positive relationship (linear regression: ln(φ)=−1.39(0.12)+0.27(0.03) × ln(π); a: t=−11.61*** and b: t=8.59***, adjusted R2=0.45). No genetically monomorphic species with high gene content variation or species with diverse core genomes but limited variation in accessory gene content were found. The same analysis was performed for the genera Pseudomonas and Streptococcus for which multiple species genome sets are available (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). All estimates of φ for these two genera were found to lie inside the 95% prediction interval of the relationship depicted in Figure 1 (Supplementary Figure S2), adding to the generality of our finding. A linear mixed-effects model was used with phylogenetic grouping included (group-dependent random intercepts) to test for the effect of genome size in addition to πsyn (fixed effects) (Table 1). This analysis was limited to the 77 species belonging to the broad Proteobacteria and Terrabacteria classifications. No effect of phylogeny or genome size (ranging from 0.9 to 10.2 Mb) on genome fluidity was found, but the positive relation with evolutionary divergence of the core genome remained highly significant (Table 1).
Figure 1

The genome fluidity statistic φ as a function of synonymous core genome nucleotide variation π for 90 free-living prokaryote species on a ln-ln scale. White dots: Proteobacteria, black dots: Terrabacteria (Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Cyanobacteria), grey dots: other taxa.

Table 1

Results of the linear mixed-effects model testing the additive effects of genome size and synonymous core genome diversity (π syn, ln-transformed) on accessory genome fluidity (φ, ln-transformed) with random intercepts fitted for each broad phylogenetic group (that is, Proteobacteria and Terrabacteria)

 Parameter estimate±s.e.aF-test
Intercept−1.64±0.18***, t=−8.87 
Genome size−0.02±0.04NS, t=−0.42F1,4=0.18, P=0.67
πsyn0.17±0.04***, t=4.05F1,4=15.42, P<0.001
Phylogenetic group<1% of total variance 

Abbreviation: NS, not significant.

Note: significance of parameter estimates are based on Wald’s t-test, ***P<0.001.

The most parsimonious model was arrived at by sequentially deleting terms and comparing model fits using F-tests of likelihood ratios.

Interestingly, the intercept of the relationship of φ with πsyn is significantly different from zero (Table 1), indicating that accessory genomes diverge before single-nucleotide polymorphisms appear in the core genome. This finding supports the emerging view that changes in gene content occur at high rates relative to mutation in bacteria (Touchon ; Nowell ; Vos ; Wielgoss ). The uptake and loss of accessory genes is in part mediated via recombination of flanking homologous sequences (Polz ). To test whether the flexibility of the accessory genome is dependent on the rate of homologous recombination in the core genome, we compared φ estimates and r/m estimates (the probability that a nucleotide is changed as the result of recombination relative to point mutation) for 26 species that also featured in a meta-analysis of homologous recombination rate (Vos and Didelot, 2009). No significant relationship was detected (linear regression: φ=0.13(0.01)+0.01(0.01) × ln(r/m), a: t=9.78*** and b: t=0.54NS, adjusted R2=−0.03; Supplementary Table S4), confirming results of a previous analysis (Narra and Ochman, 2006). The φ estimate only provides a general indication of genome fluidity as it ignores genome rearrangements or plasmids, and we cannot exclude the fact that elevated or decreased levels of genome fluidity are associated with some of the many phyla that could not be included in this analysis due to a lack of data. These caveats aside, the positive relationship of genome fluidity with synonymous diversity is highly significant. The synonymous nucleotide diversity equals two times the product of the mutation rate μ and effective population size Ne for haploid species. As variation in prokaryote mutation rate is believed to be relatively small (Lynch, 2010), πsyn can be taken as a proxy for Ne. Large effective population size is expected to result in generally higher levels of genetic diversity due to neutral evolution (Kimura, 1984). The result of our cross-species meta-analysis is therefore consistent with the expectation that large Ne species exhibit greater accessory genome variation. A variety of studies have suggested that many gene content changes have only minor effects on fitness and are effectively neutral (Gogarten and Townsend, 2005; Baumdicker ; Haegeman and Weitz, 2012; Knöppel ), although it is clear that a proportion of gene gains and losses will be significantly deleterious or beneficial. To gain a full understanding of selection on the accessory genome, it will be vital to collect data on the distribution of fitness effects of gene content changes (Vos ).
  16 in total

Review 1.  Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation.

Authors:  H Ochman; J G Lawrence; E A Groisman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Horizontal gene transfer, genome innovation and evolution.

Authors:  J Peter Gogarten; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  A comparison of homologous recombination rates in bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Michiel Vos; Xavier Didelot
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Evolution of the mutation rate.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Minor fitness costs in an experimental model of horizontal gene transfer in bacteria.

Authors:  Anna Knöppel; Peter A Lind; Ulrika Lustig; Joakim Näsvall; Dan I Andersson
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 6.  Horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of bacterial and archaeal population structure.

Authors:  Martin F Polz; Eric J Alm; William P Hanage
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  The infinitely many genes model for the distributed genome of bacteria.

Authors:  Franz Baumdicker; Wolfgang R Hess; Peter Pfaffelhuber
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Genomic fluidity: an integrative view of gene diversity within microbial populations.

Authors:  Andrey O Kislyuk; Bart Haegeman; Nicholas H Bergman; Joshua S Weitz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  A neutral theory of genome evolution and the frequency distribution of genes.

Authors:  Bart Haegeman; Joshua S Weitz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Organised genome dynamics in the Escherichia coli species results in highly diverse adaptive paths.

Authors:  Marie Touchon; Claire Hoede; Olivier Tenaillon; Valérie Barbe; Simon Baeriswyl; Philippe Bidet; Edouard Bingen; Stéphane Bonacorsi; Christiane Bouchier; Odile Bouvet; Alexandra Calteau; Hélène Chiapello; Olivier Clermont; Stéphane Cruveiller; Antoine Danchin; Médéric Diard; Carole Dossat; Meriem El Karoui; Eric Frapy; Louis Garry; Jean Marc Ghigo; Anne Marie Gilles; James Johnson; Chantal Le Bouguénec; Mathilde Lescat; Sophie Mangenot; Vanessa Martinez-Jéhanne; Ivan Matic; Xavier Nassif; Sophie Oztas; Marie Agnès Petit; Christophe Pichon; Zoé Rouy; Claude Saint Ruf; Dominique Schneider; Jérôme Tourret; Benoit Vacherie; David Vallenet; Claudine Médigue; Eduardo P C Rocha; Erick Denamur
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Diversity within species: interpreting strains in microbiomes.

Authors:  Thea Van Rossum; Pamela Ferretti; Oleksandr M Maistrenko; Peer Bork
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 2.  Horizontal gene transfer and adaptive evolution in bacteria.

Authors:  Brian J Arnold; I-Ting Huang; William P Hanage
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Toward quantifying the adaptive role of bacterial pangenomes during environmental perturbations.

Authors:  Roth E Conrad; Tomeu Viver; Juan F Gago; Janet K Hatt; Stephanus N Venter; Ramon Rossello-Mora; Konstantinos T Konstantinidis
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 11.217

4.  Prochlorococcus have low global mutation rate and small effective population size.

Authors:  Zhuoyu Chen; Xiaojun Wang; Yu Song; Qinglu Zeng; Yao Zhang; Haiwei Luo
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 5.  Evolution of Microbial Genomics: Conceptual Shifts over a Quarter Century.

Authors:  Eugene V Koonin; Kira S Makarova; Yuri I Wolf
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 18.230

6.  Lateral Gene Transfer Dynamics in the Ancient Bacterial Genus Streptomyces.

Authors:  Bradon R McDonald; Cameron R Currie
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 7.  Et tu, Brute? Not Even Intracellular Mutualistic Symbionts Escape Horizontal Gene Transfer.

Authors:  Sergio López-Madrigal; Rosario Gil
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Piggy: a rapid, large-scale pan-genome analysis tool for intergenic regions in bacteria.

Authors:  Harry A Thorpe; Sion C Bayliss; Samuel K Sheppard; Edward J Feil
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.524

9.  Rapid Gene Turnover as a Significant Source of Genetic Variation in a Recently Seeded Population of a Healthcare-Associated Pathogen.

Authors:  Lucía Graña-Miraglia; Luis F Lozano; Consuelo Velázquez; Patricia Volkow-Fernández; Ángeles Pérez-Oseguera; Miguel A Cevallos; Santiago Castillo-Ramírez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Distinct Campylobacter fetus lineages adapted as livestock pathogens and human pathobionts in the intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Gregorio Iraola; Samuel C Forster; Nitin Kumar; Philippe Lehours; Sadjia Bekal; Francisco J García-Peña; Fernando Paolicchi; Claudia Morsella; Helmut Hotzel; Po-Ren Hsueh; Ana Vidal; Simon Lévesque; Wataru Yamazaki; Claudia Balzan; Agueda Vargas; Alessandra Piccirillo; Bonnie Chaban; Janet E Hill; Laura Betancor; Luis Collado; Isabelle Truyers; Anne C Midwinter; Hatice T Dagi; Francis Mégraud; Lucía Calleros; Ruben Pérez; Hugo Naya; Trevor D Lawley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.