| Literature DB >> 28362359 |
María C Nevárez-Martínez1,2, Marek P Kobylański3, Paweł Mazierski4, Jolanta Wółkiewicz5, Grzegorz Trykowski6, Anna Malankowska7, Magda Kozak8, Patricio J Espinoza-Montero9, Adriana Zaleska-Medynska10.
Abstract
Vertically oriented, self-organizedEntities:
Keywords: TiO2–MnO2 nanotubes; alloys; anodization; toluene degradation; visible light induced photocatalysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28362359 PMCID: PMC6154631 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22040564
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Sample labels, preparation conditions, and selected properties of pristine TiO2 and TiO2–MnO2 nanotubes.
| Sample Label | Preparation Parameters | External Diameter (nm) | Tube Length (μm) | Wall Thickness (nm) | Average Crystallite Size (nm) | EDX Analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrolyte, Applied Voltage | Ti (wt. %) | Mn (wt. %) | C (wt. %) | O (wt. %) | |||||
| Ti_30V | EG 98% ( | 81 ± 9 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 10 ± 2 | 33 | 71.47 | 0 | 0.19 | 28.34 |
| Ti_40V | EG 98% ( | 100 ± 7 | 5 ± 0.4 | 13 ± 2 | 34 | 66.73 | 0 | 0.03 | 33.24 |
| Ti_50V | EG 98% ( | 120 ± 12 | 16.2 ± 0.2 | 18 ± 3 | 38 | 67.69 | 0 | 0.03 | 32.28 |
| Ti90Mn10_30V | EG 98% ( | 76 ± 9 | 1 ± 0.1 | 8 ± 3 | 31 | 76.15 | 8.91 | 0.01 | 14.83 |
| Ti90Mn10_40V | EG 98% ( | 92 ± 8 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 9 ± 3 | 32 | 82.73 | 7.77 | 0.01 | 9.51 |
| Ti90Mn10_50V | EG 98% ( | 118 ± 4 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 9 ± 2 | 34 | 68.79 | 6.46 | 0.03 | 24.72 |
| Ti85Mn15_40V_2% | EG 98% ( | 94 ± 11 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 9 ± 2 | 31 | 77.20 | 11.14 | 0.01 | 11.67 |
| Ti85Mn15_40V_5% | EG 95% ( | 90 ± 7 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 9 ± 2 | 35 | 79.94 | 12.40 | 0.01 | 7.66 |
| Ti85Mn15_40V_10% | EG 90% ( | 115 ± 8 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 11 ± 2 | 34 | 61.76 | 9.11 | 1.18 | 27.95 |
| Ti95Mn5_40V | EG 98% ( | 94 ± 8 | 3.4 ± 0.3 | 9 ± 1 | 32 | 70.89 | 2.10 | 0.03 | 27.00 |
Figure 1Top-view and cross-sectional SEM images of pristine TiO2 and TiO2–MnO2 NTs (the effect of applied voltage, manganese content in the Mn/Ti alloy, and water content in the electrolyte on the morphology of formed nanotubes) and EDX mapping of the Ti90Mn10_30V sample.
Figure 2Proposed growth mechanism of TiO2–MnO2 NTs.
Figure 3XRD spectra of pristine TiO2 and TiO2–MnO2 NTs. Effect of (a) anodization potential; (b) manganese content in the alloy; and (c) water content in the electrolyte.
Figure 4Raman spectra of pristine TiO2 and TiO2–MnO2 NTs. Effect of (a) anodization potential; (b) manganese content in the alloy; and (c) water content in the electrolyte.
Figure 5UV-Vis spectra of pristine TiO2 and TiO2–MnO2 NTs. Effect of (a) anodization potential; (b) manganese content in the alloy; and (c) water content in the electrolyte.
Figure 6Photoluminescence spectra of pristine TiO2 and TiO2–MnO2 NTs. Effect of (a) anodization potential; (b) manganese content in the alloy; and (c) water content in the electrolyte.
Figure 7Photoactivity of pristine TiO2 and TiO2–MnO2 NTs in gas phase degradation of toluene under Vis light irradiation (λmax = 465 nm). Effect of (a) applied voltage; (b) manganese content in the alloy, and (c) water content in the electrolyte.
Initial reaction rate and reaction rate constant for the gas phase degradation of toluene (200 ppmv) under Vis light irradiation (25-LED array, λmax = 465 nm, irradiation intensity = 14.5 mW·cm−2) in the presence of pristine TiO2 and TiO2–MnO2 NTs.
| Sample Label | Photocatalytic Toluene Degradation | |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Reaction Rate × 102 (μmol·dm−3·min−1) | Reaction Rate Constant × 103 (min−1) | |
| Ti_30V | 0.37 ± 0.09 | 0.42 ± 0.10 |
| Ti_40V | 0.43 ± 0.09 | 0.49 ± 0.10 |
| Ti_50V | 0.64 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.04 |
| Ti90Mn10_30V | 8.54 ± 0.53 | 9.57 ± 0.59 |
| Ti90Mn10_40V | 4.97 ± 0.30 | 5.57 ± 0.33 |
| Ti90Mn10_50V | 6.04 ± 0.08 | 6.77 ± 0.09 |
| Ti85Mn15_40V_2% | 4.18 ± 0.77 | 4.69 ± 0.87 |
| Ti85Mn15_40V_5% | 3.79 ± 0.43 | 4.24 ± 0.48 |
| Ti85Mn15_40V_10% | 5.84 ± 1.61 | 6.54 ± 1.81 |
| Ti95Mn5_40V | 5.76 ± 0.12 | 6.45 ± 0.14 |
Figure 8(a) Photoactivity of Ti90Mn10_30V sample in gas phase degradation of toluene under different wavelengths of irradiation (λmax = 375, 415, 465 nm) and (b) possible excitation mechanism of TiO2–MnO2 NTs under Vis light irradiation.