Literature DB >> 28362219

Validity of auditory perceptual assessment of velopharyngeal function and dysfunction - the VPC-Sum and the VPC-Rate.

Anette Lohmander1, Emilie Hagberg1,2, Christina Persson3, Elisabeth Willadsen4, Inger Lundeborg5, Julie Davies6, Christina Havstam7, Maria Boers8, Mia Kisling-Møller9, Suvi Alaluusua10, Ragnhild Aukner11, Nina Helen Pedersen12, Leena Turunen10, Jill Nyberg1,2.   

Abstract

Overall weighted or composite variables for perceptual auditory estimation of velopharyngeal closure or competence have been used in several studies for evaluation of velopharyngeal function during speech. The aim of the present study was to investigate the validity of a composite score (VPC-Sum) and of auditory perceptual ratings of velopharyngeal competence (VPC-Rate). Available VPC-Sum scores and judgments of associated variables (hypernasality, audible nasal air leakage, weak pressure consonants, and non-oral articulation) from 391 5-year olds with repaired cleft palate (the Scandcleft project) were used to investigate content validity, and 339 of these were compared with an overall judgment of velopharyngeal competence (VPC-Rate) on the same patients by the same listeners. Significant positive correlations were found between the VPC-Sum and each of the associated variables (Cronbachs alpha 0.55-0.87, P < 0.001), and a moderately significant positive correlation between VPC-Sum and VPC-Rate (Rho 0.698, P < 0.01). The latter classified cases well when VPC-Sum was dichotomized with 67% predicted velopharyngeal competence and 90% velopharyngeal incompetence. The validity of the VPC-Sum was good and the VPC-Rate a good predictor, suggesting possible use of both measures depending on the objective.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audible nasal emission; VPI symptom; hypernasality; velopharyngeal closure; velopharyngeal competence; velopharyngeal impairment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28362219     DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2017.1302510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon        ISSN: 0269-9206            Impact factor:   1.346


  2 in total

1.  Timing Of Primary Surgery for cleft palate (TOPS): protocol for a randomised trial of palate surgery at 6 months versus 12 months of age.

Authors:  William Shaw; Gunvor Semb; Anette Lohmander; Christina Persson; Elisabeth Willadsen; Jill Clayton-Smith; Inge Kiemle Trindade; Kevin J Munro; Carrol Gamble; Nicola Harman; Elizabeth J Conroy; Dieter Weichart; Paula Williamson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Coverage, reporting degree and design of the Swedish quality registry for patients born with cleft lip and/or palate.

Authors:  Kristina Klintö; Agneta Karsten; Agneta Marcusson; Anna Paganini; Sara Rizell; Jenny Cajander; Karin Brunnegård; Malin Hakelius; Åsa Okhiria; Petra Peterson; Avni Abdiu; Christina Havstam; Hans Mark; Emilie Hagberg; Lena Björnström; Anna-Paulina Wiedel; Magnus Becker
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.