Literature DB >> 28362186

A proposal for a new classification of complications in craniosynostosis surgery.

Dmitri Shastin1, Sharron Peacock1, Velu Guruswamy2, Melpo Kapetanstrataki3, David T Bonthron3, Maggie Bellew4, Vernon Long5, Lachlan Carter6, Ian Smith4, John Goodden1, John Russell6, Mark Liddington4, Paul Chumas1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Complications have been used extensively to facilitate evaluation of craniosynostosis practice. However, description of complications tends to be nonstandardized, making comparison difficult. The authors propose a new pragmatic classification of complications that relies on prospective data collection, is geared to capture significant morbidity as well as any "near misses" in a systematic fashion, and can be used as a quality improvement tool. METHODS Data on complications for all patients undergoing surgery for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis between 2010 and 2015 were collected from a prospective craniofacial audit database maintained at the authors' institution. Information on comorbidities, details of surgery, and follow-up was extracted from medical records, anesthetic and operation charts, and electronic databases. Complications were defined as any unexpected event that resulted or could have resulted in a temporary or permanent damage to the child. RESULTS A total of 108 operations for the treatment of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis were performed in 103 patients during the 5-year study period. Complications were divided into 6 types: 0) perioperative occurrences; 1) inpatient complications; 2) outpatient complications not requiring readmission; 3) complications requiring readmission; 4) unexpected long-term deficit; and 5) mortality. These types were further subdivided according to the length of stay and time after discharge. The overall complication rate was found to be 35.9%. CONCLUSIONS The proportion of children with some sort of complication using the proposed definition was much higher than commonly reported, predominantly due to the inclusion of problems often dismissed as minor. The authors believe that these complications should be included in determining complication rates, as they will cause distress to families and may point to potential areas for improving a surgical service.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACS = American College of Surgeons; FOAR = frontoorbital advancement and remodeling; ICP = intracranial pressure; LOS = length of stay; MACR = major calvarial reconstruction; MICR = minor calvarial reconstruction; NSQIP = National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; SD = standard deviation; audit; complications; craniofacial; craniosynostosis; morbidity; outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28362186     DOI: 10.3171/2017.1.PEDS16343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  3 in total

1.  Recombinant mouse periostin ameliorates coronal sutures fusion in Twist1+/- mice.

Authors:  Shanshan Bai; Dong Li; Liang Xu; Huichuan Duan; Jie Yuan; Min Wei
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.531

2.  Fronto-orbital advancement and reconstruction using reverse frontal bone graft without the use of orbital bar: a technical note.

Authors:  James M W Robins; Asim J Sheikh; Dmitri Shastin; Moritz W J Schramm; Paula Carter; John L Russell; Mark Liddington; Paul D Chumas
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  On the Negative Outcomes of Craniofacial Surgery.

Authors:  S M Balaji
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.