BACKGROUND: In vitro dynamic culture conditions play a pivotal role in developing engineered tissue grafts, where the supply of oxygen and nutrients, and waste removal must be permitted within construct thickness. For tubular scaffolds, mass transfer is enhanced by introducing a convective flow through rotating bioreactors with positive effects on cell proliferation, scaffold colonization and extracellular matrix deposition. We characterized a novel polyurethane-based tubular scaffold and investigated the impact of 3 different culture configurations over cell behavior: dynamic (i) single-phase (medium) rotation and (ii) double-phase exposure (medium-air) rotation; static (iii) single-phase static culture as control. METHODS: A new mixture of polyol was tested to create polyurethane foams (PUFs) as 3D scaffold for tissue engineering. The structure obtained was morphologically and mechanically analyzed tested. Murine fibroblasts were externally seeded on the novel porous PUF scaffold, and cultured under different dynamic conditions. Viability assay, DNA quantification, SEM and histological analyses were performed at different time points. RESULTS: The PUF scaffold presented interesting mechanical properties and morphology adequate to promote cell adhesion, highlighting its potential for tissue engineering purposes. Results showed that constructs under dynamic conditions contain enhanced viability and cell number, exponentially increased for double-phase rotation; under this last configuration, cells uniformly covered both the external surface and the lumen. CONCLUSIONS: The developed 3D structure combined with the alternated exposure to air and medium provided the optimal in vitro biochemical conditioning with adequate nutrient supply for cells. The results highlight a valuable combination of material and dynamic culture for tissue engineering applications.
BACKGROUND: In vitro dynamic culture conditions play a pivotal role in developing engineered tissue grafts, where the supply of oxygen and nutrients, and waste removal must be permitted within construct thickness. For tubular scaffolds, mass transfer is enhanced by introducing a convective flow through rotating bioreactors with positive effects on cell proliferation, scaffold colonization and extracellular matrix deposition. We characterized a novel polyurethane-based tubular scaffold and investigated the impact of 3 different culture configurations over cell behavior: dynamic (i) single-phase (medium) rotation and (ii) double-phase exposure (medium-air) rotation; static (iii) single-phase static culture as control. METHODS: A new mixture of polyol was tested to create polyurethane foams (PUFs) as 3D scaffold for tissue engineering. The structure obtained was morphologically and mechanically analyzed tested. Murine fibroblasts were externally seeded on the novel porous PUF scaffold, and cultured under different dynamic conditions. Viability assay, DNA quantification, SEM and histological analyses were performed at different time points. RESULTS: The PUF scaffold presented interesting mechanical properties and morphology adequate to promote cell adhesion, highlighting its potential for tissue engineering purposes. Results showed that constructs under dynamic conditions contain enhanced viability and cell number, exponentially increased for double-phase rotation; under this last configuration, cells uniformly covered both the external surface and the lumen. CONCLUSIONS: The developed 3D structure combined with the alternated exposure to air and medium provided the optimal in vitro biochemical conditioning with adequate nutrient supply for cells. The results highlight a valuable combination of material and dynamic culture for tissue engineering applications.
Noncommunicable diseases, mainly cardiovascular diseases, cancers, diabetes, obesity
and chronic respiratory diseases, are the main causes of death in high-income
countries. Cardiovascular pathologies account for 17.3 million deaths annually,
followed by malignant tumors with 7.6 million, respiratory diseases (4.2 million)
and diabetes (1.3 million) (1). Considering the 12 major causes of death in the world, more than half
regard hollow organ pathologies (2, 3).Over the last 50 years, transplantation of a wide variety of tissues and organs,
reconstructive surgical techniques and replacement with artificial devices have
significantly enhanced patient life expectancy and quality of life. Unfortunately,
these solutions suffer from many limitations, such as donor shortage and requirement
for lifelong immunosuppressive assumption, increased risk of infections, undesirable
side effects and, in some cases, finite durability (4-5-6).This situation led to the tissue engineering (TE) approach to develop in vitro
cellularized functional substitutes able to restore or improve tissue and organ
activities (6, 7). In this regard,
bioreactor-scaffold complexes, together with autologous cells, are pivotal to
obtaining a functional implantable tissue engineered graft.To reproduce in vitro optimal biochemical and biomechanical conditioning, the
optimization of the mass transport within cultured three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds
is necessary. For the regeneration of complex hollow constructs, mass transfer can
be enhanced by a convective flow obtained through dynamic culture within
longitudinal rotation bioreactors. These devices allow an increased removal of
catabolites and an optimized nutrient diffusion in 3D scaffolds, compared with
static culture. In this last condition, an adequate oxygen supply reaches a maximum
scaffold depth of 100 µm (8-9-10). A controlled increase in
rotational speed, inducing different laminar shear stress, can positively influence
uniform cell proliferation, a better colonization and extracellular matrix
deposition (ECM) throughout the scaffold thickness (11-12-13-14).In addition to the dynamic culture conditions, scaffold architecture and biomaterial
chemistry affect grafts mechanical properties, mass transport, cellular response and
interaction with the scaffold (15, 16). A
controlled pore size and an increased pore interconnection allow cell migration,
proliferation and tissue growth, promoting also the postimplant angiogenesis
throughout the scaffold (17).Synthetic scaffolds are very promising for hollow tissue regeneration because of the
ease in controlling their architecture, surface chemistry and mechanical properties,
in relation to the targeted tissue (15, 16, 18, 19), by adjusting production process
parameters (20, 21). Among synthetic polymers
used for tubular tissue-engineered structures (14, 16, 22), polyurethane foams (PUFs) are very
interesting for 3D scaffold applications (i.e., bone, cartilage and soft tissues)
(23-24-25-26) thanks to their high tunable process
properties that can modify pore size, interconnectivity and mechanical
properties.At present, despite the relevance of suitable supply of oxygen and nutrients with 3D
scaffolds throughout dynamic bioreactors, in the literature there is no evidence
about a generalization of convective flow as both biochemical and mechanical
stimulus in in vitro dynamic cultures. Moreover, the differences in cell metabolism,
viability and colonization of a tubular support between a double-phase (medium-air)
(8) in comparison with a
single-phase (medium only), or static incubation of the construct, have never been
reported in the literature.Thus, in the present work we demonstrated the importance of the convective flow
induced by longitudinal rotation for tubular constructs. Firstly, we investigated a
new formulation of PUF scaffold for application in tubular TE, characterizing the
mechanical and biological properties. Then, we analyzed the effect of longitudinal
rotation on cell activity into the PUF scaffold under different configurations of in
vitro culture. We compared 2 diverse dynamic conditioning cases: (i) single-phase
(medium) rotation and (ii) double-phase exposure (medium-air) rotation. A
single-phase exposure (only culture medium) in static condition was used as a
control. The ultimate aim was to identify the optimal dynamic culture conditions in
terms of cell proliferation, metabolism and colonization, demonstrating that the
double-phase exposure positively affects cell behavior.
Materials and Methods
Polyurethane foam Synthesis
PUFs were synthesized following a previously described 1-step bulk polymerization
method (27, 28), using water as an
expanding agent and iron-acetylacetonate (FeAA) as catalyst. Briefly, a new
polyol mixture was ad hoc prepared using the reagents listed in Table I. FeAA (0.001%
w/wpolyol), distilled water (2% w/wpolyol) and the
appropriate amount of isocyanate (stoichiometric ratio of OH/NCO = 100/73) and
methylene diphenyl diisocyanate prepolymer (Desmodur® PF, Bayer, Germany; –NCO =
23.0% ± 0.5%) were added to the polyol mixture, mixed with a mechanical stirrer
for 60 seconds and finally poured into a custom-made poly(methylmethacrylate)
mold (V = 500 cm3). The expanding reaction took place at room
temperature (RT). Foams were extracted from the mold after 72 hours, and the
superficial compact skins were removed to obtain a homogeneous porous structure.
Then foams were postcured at RT for 7 days. The synthesized structures were
sliced selecting 2 different heights (h = 3 mm and h = 6 mm), purified by a
48-hour immersion in absolute ethanol at RT, and subsequently carefully dried in
a fume hood before characterization.
Table I
Components of the polyol mixture and their main properties
Component
Functionality
OH number (mgKOH/g)
MW (Da)
Producer
Desmophen® 10WF18
2.7
27.6
5,500
Bayer
Desmophen® 7619W
≈ 3
128.8
-
Bayer
Desmophen® 4051B
≈ 4
467.4
480
Bayer
1-4, Butandiol
2
1,245.0
-
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethylene glycol (EG)
2
1,810.0
-
Sigma-Aldrich
Potassium acetate in EG
-
1,810.0
-
Sigma-Aldrich
DABCO 33-LV
-
560.0
-
Air Products
MW = molecular weight; OH = hydroxy group.
Components of the polyol mixture and their main propertiesMW = molecular weight; OH = hydroxy group.
Scaffold Morphological Characterization
Scanning Electron Microscopy Observation
Samples morphology was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM;
Stereoscan 360; Cambridge Instruments) at 15-18 keV and working distance of
7.5-12 mm. Before analysis, the samples were sputter-coated with a 20-nm
layer of gold (Sputter Coater S150B; Edwards). The images were acquired at
25× and 100× magnification.
Micro-computed Tomography
Three PUF specimens (Ø = 6 mm, h = 6 mm) were individually analyzed.
Porosity, average pore size, pore size distribution and pore interconnection
were evaluated by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis using a 1172
micro-CT imaging system (Skyscan; Aartselaar) following a previously
described protocol (28). 3D reconstruction of the internal pore morphology was
carried out using axial bitmap images and analyzed by CTan software
(Skyscan; Aartselaar). The gray scale threshold was set between 55 and 230,
removing all objects smaller than 400 voxels and not connected to the 3D
model. To eliminate potential edge effects, the cylindrical volume of
interest (VOI) was selected in the center of the specimen (Ø = 3 mm, h = 1.5
mm). Scaffold porosity was then calculated as:where vol% of binarized object is the total volume of
scaffold, calculated as the product between the voxel volume and the voxel
number of binarized solid elements contained in the VOI.A shrink-wrap process was performed between two 3D measurements to shrink the
outside boundary of the VOI in a scaffold through any openings whose size
was equal to or larger than a fixed threshold value (29). Interconnectivity was calculated
as follows:where V is the total volume of the VOI, Vshrink-wrap is the VOI
volume after shrink-wrap processing and Vm is the volume of the
sample material. The interconnective pore size was hereby called the
cutoff pore diameter.
Water Uptake
Dried samples (Ø = 4 mm, h = 3 mm) were immersed in deionized water
(dH2O) at 37°C; at each time point (0.5, 2, 6, 24 hours, and
every 24 hours up to the 25th day). Specimens were drawn from the water,
wiped with filter paper to remove excess liquid, and weighed. The water
uptake (W.U.%) was calculated according to the Eq. [3]:where W is the dry weight and
W is the wet weight at the time point
t.
Mechanical Compression Characterization
The mechanical properties of PUFs were investigated using a dynamic
mechanical analyzer (DMA Q800; TA Instruments). Compression tests were
performed on disk-shaped specimens (Ø = 4 mm, h = 3 mm) in dry (n = 3) and
hydrated (n = 3) condition by applying a preload of 0.1 N; after an isotherm
at 37°C for 5 minutes, a deformation ramp of 2.5%/min up to 50% deformation
of the initial thickness was applied, followed by a deformation ramp of
5%/min down to 0.1% deformation. Specimens for hydrated tests were
previously immersed in dH2O to reach the swelling plateau.
Experiments were carried out in immersion in a custom-made chamber, to
maintain the sample in hydrated condition for the whole test time Tangent
modulus (E), collapse modulus (m∗), stress at 10% deformation
(σ10%), maximum stress (σmax), residual
deformation (ε∗) and hysteresis area (I), related to energy dispersion, were
drawn from the stress–strain curve (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Representative stress–strain curve obtained by compressive test of
polyurethane foam (PUF) samples. Mechanical parameters reported are
tangent modulus (E), collapse modulus (m∗), stress at 10%
deformation (σ10%), maximum stress (σmax),
residual deformation (ε∗) and hysteresis area.
Representative stress–strain curve obtained by compressive test of
polyurethane foam (PUF) samples. Mechanical parameters reported are
tangent modulus (E), collapse modulus (m∗), stress at 10%
deformation (σ10%), maximum stress (σmax),
residual deformation (ε∗) and hysteresis area.
In Vitro Biological Characterization
Cell Expansion
Cells from a murine fibroblast cell line (L929, 85011425; Sigma-Aldrich) were
cultured and expanded in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM 5671;
Sigma-Aldrich), with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, F7524; Sigma-Aldrich), 1%
HEPES (H3375; Sigma-Aldrich), 1% sodium pyruvate (P2256; Sigma-Aldrich), 1%
L-glutamine (G7513; Sigma-Aldrich) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (P0781;
Sigma-Aldrich).
Scaffold Preparation and Disinfection
For static culture, PUF samples (Ø = 8 mm, h=6 mm) were cut using a biopsy
punch. For dynamic culture, cylindrical samples were prepared with an inner
diameter of 4 mm. All PUF samples were disinfected by immersion in 70% v/v
ethanol solution (EtOH) for 30 minutes, subsequently washed with sterile
phosphate buffered saline (PBS) 4 times and left drying overnight in a
biosafety cabinet.
Biological Assessment
Biological tests were performed under static culture conditions, to evaluate
the interaction of L929 fibroblasts with PUF. L929 (seeding density = 2 ×
104 cell/cm2) were seeded on the scaffolds. Cells
seeded on polystyrene culture plate (TCP) were considered as controls
(Ctrl). At each time point (t = 1, 3 and 7 days) SEM and viability and DNA
quantification analyses were performed.
Dynamic Culture Configurations
Dynamic cultures were performed as described here below, and at considered
time points, different analysis were performed. Sterilized
cylindrical-shaped scaffolds were mounted on a plain 4 mm Ø stainless steel
mandrel using surgical gloves. For the dynamic tests, 2 different conditions
were examined (Fig. 2).
The first (Fig. 2A)
consisted of a double-phase culture (double-phase): the scaffold was half
immersed in culture medium and alternatively exposed to the air and to the
culture medium in a rotating bioreactor with a speed rate of 3 rpm. In the
second configuration (Fig.
2B), the entire scaffold was immersed in the culture medium, with
a rotation speed of 3 rpm (single-phase). In the static culture (Fig. 2C), considered as
the control, the scaffold was completely covered by the culture medium
(static). The bioreactor setup (Fig. 3) was suitable for tubular
scaffolds and its configuration was adapted from the previous one (8); the Petri-like cap
of the device was maintained as it allowed a safe and sterile exchange of
the controlled air of the incubator with the inner chamber. For the
single-phase and double-phase configurations, the rotation movement was
transmitted through polyoxymethylene holders to the cylindrical scaffold
harbor, using direct current motors (PSU 130; Lascar Electronics Ltd.).
Fig. 2
Scheme of the experimental conditions in the InBreath bioreactor.
Double-phase (A) scaffolds were under longitudinal
rotation and alternately exposed to air and culture medium.
Single-phase (B) scaffolds were under longitudinal
rotation and exposed only to culture medium. Static culture
(control; (C) scaffolds were cultivated in static
conditions and exposed only to culture medium. Light blue represents
the tubular polyurethane foam (PUF) scaffold, gray indicates the
plain stainless steel mandrel and rose indicates culture medium.
Fig. 3
(A) Polyurethane foam (PUF) cylindrical sample,
(B) PUF scaffolds located on a plain stainless
steel mandrel in the InBreath bioreactor (8). (C) Bioreactor
setup used for the different configuration culture systems as it is
inserted in the incubator; in this picture the Petri dish–like cap,
which allows for oxygen exchange with the controlled environment of
the incubator while maintaining sterility of the inner chamber, is
visible.
Scheme of the experimental conditions in the InBreath bioreactor.
Double-phase (A) scaffolds were under longitudinal
rotation and alternately exposed to air and culture medium.
Single-phase (B) scaffolds were under longitudinal
rotation and exposed only to culture medium. Static culture
(control; (C) scaffolds were cultivated in static
conditions and exposed only to culture medium. Light blue represents
the tubular polyurethane foam (PUF) scaffold, gray indicates the
plain stainless steel mandrel and rose indicates culture medium.(A) Polyurethane foam (PUF) cylindrical sample,
(B) PUF scaffolds located on a plain stainless
steel mandrel in the InBreath bioreactor (8). (C) Bioreactor
setup used for the different configuration culture systems as it is
inserted in the incubator; in this picture the Petri dish–like cap,
which allows for oxygen exchange with the controlled environment of
the incubator while maintaining sterility of the inner chamber, is
visible.PUF cylindrical scaffolds (5 for each time point) were seeded with L929
(density = 2 × 106 cells per specimen) by 4 cell suspension drops
(10 µL/drop) every 90°. Double-phase and single-phase systems were
continuously rotating at 2 rpm for 4 hours in the incubator to promote cell
adhesion and for a more homogeneous cell distribution. Samples in static
condition were maintained for the same time in the incubator, without any
rotation. At the end of the seeding step, each bioreactor was maintained
under static conditions for 24 hours, after adding 45 mL of DMEM to
completely submerge the scaffolds and allow better cell adhesion. Then, 15
mL of culture medium was removed from the double-phase system to expose the
superior half of the scaffold to the air. Half of the media volume was
manually changed every 72 hours. Analyses were performed for 7, 14 and 21
days; for each time point, 5 samples were harvested.
Sample Analyses
Cell Viability Assay
Cell viability was evaluated at each time point with the resazurin
colorimetric assay (Alamar Blue®; Serotec Ltd, Kidlington, Oxford, UK).
Samples cultured in bioreactors were transferred to a 24-well plate.
Briefly, the Alamar Blue® solution was diluted at a 1:10 ratio in DMEM; 500
µL (direct cytocompatibility test) or 1 mL (dynamic culture) was added to
each sample and incubated for 4 hours in the incubator. Supernatant
fluorescence at 590 nm (λ = 510 nm as the reference wavelength) was measured
by a Multifunction Tecan (GENios Plus).
DNA Quantification
The total number of cells was estimated by DNA quantification for the static
and the dynamic cultures. Samples were immersed in cell digestion buffer at
55°C overnight with 0.005 volume proteinase K, followed by a treatment with
sodium acetate pH 5.2 to precipitate proteins and debris. To extract DNA,
the supernatant was diluted in 98% and 70% EtOH and centrifuged. The
resulting DNA pellet was rehydrated with dH2O. Total DNA was
marked with SYBR® Green (S9430; Sigma-Aldrich). A calibration curve using
salmon sperm (500 ng/μL) was plotted as the reference line for the extracted
DNA. Fluorescence at 535 nm was measured by Tecan spectrophotometer, by
analyzing each rehydrated DNA sample (100 µL each) in triplicate. Cell
number was estimated considering an average DNA quantity of 7 pg/cell.
SEM Observations
Microscopic investigations were performed by SEM. The specimens were fixed by
immersion in a solution of 3% v/v of 50% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium
cacodylate for 2 hours, and subsequently washed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate.
Later, samples were dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethyl
alcohol and finally gold sputtered. Images of inner and outer specimen
surfaces were acquired at 250× magnification for samples obtained in the
cytocompatibility test, and at 25× and 100× magnifications for dynamic
experiments in bioreactor.
Histological Analysis
To assess the extent of scaffold colonization and ECM overall deposition,
histological analyses were performed on 10-µm-thick slices of the
cylindrical samples (superior, middle and inferior part) for each time point
and for the 3 culture configurations. PUF constructs were fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde. After treatment with sucrose (30% w/v in PBS) and a
following step with a 50% tissue-freezing medium in 30% w/v sucrose
solution, specimens were immersed in OCT and frozen in liquid nitrogen.
Thereafter, samples were cut by a microtome and stained with hematoxylin and
eosin. Histological images were acquired at 2× magnification.
Statistical Analysis
Results were expressed as means and standard deviation of at least 3 samples.
Two-way and multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) test were performed using
GraphPad Prism software for Windows (GraphPad Software Inc.). A significance
level of a p value <0.05 was applied.
Results
Morphological Characterization of PUF Scaffolds
SEM Observation
The morphology of PUF observed by SEM analysis is shown in Figure 4A. PUF presented
homogeneous morphology with regular round-shaped pores and size
distribution, with a high pore interconnection.
Fig. 4
(A) Representative SEM images of the surface and
cross-section morphology of polyurethane foam (PUF). Red arrows show
high pore interconnections (scale bar: 100 μm). (B)
Average pore size distribution obtained by micro-computed tomography
analysis; pore interconnection is expressed in terms of accessible
porosity at different cutoff pore diameters. (C) Water
uptake for up to 17 days. (D) Representative
compressive stress–strain curves of PUF tested in dry and hydrated
conditions. PUF = polyurethane foam.
(A) Representative SEM images of the surface and
cross-section morphology of polyurethane foam (PUF). Red arrows show
high pore interconnections (scale bar: 100 μm). (B)
Average pore size distribution obtained by micro-computed tomography
analysis; pore interconnection is expressed in terms of accessible
porosity at different cutoff pore diameters. (C) Water
uptake for up to 17 days. (D) Representative
compressive stress–strain curves of PUF tested in dry and hydrated
conditions. PUF = polyurethane foam.
Micro-CT Analysis
The values of total porosity, open porosity, pore size and pore wall
thickness obtained by micro-CT are reported in Table II. Values of total porosity
indicated that interconnected pores occupied most of the volume of the
structures. The values of the average pore size and the thickness of pore
wall confirmed the qualitative observations with SEM. The percentage of
accessible porosity decreased with increasing interconnection diameter, but
was always at about 80%, indicating a high pore interconnection (Fig. 4B).
Table II
Total porosity, open porosity, average pore size and pore wall
thickness for PUF analyzed by micro-CT
Total porosity, open porosity, average pore size and pore wall
thickness for PUF analyzed by micro-CTmicro-CT = micro-computed tomography; PUF = polyurethane
foam.The kinetics of PUF water uptake (Fig. 4C) showed a transitory initial
phase, with high water uptake rate, until reaching a plateau after 7 days.
As expected, the plateau value was maintained for the test time considered,
without any significant difference among the W.U.% values (p>0.05).
Mechanical Characterization
In Figure 4D,
representative hysteresis cycle curves of PUF specimens obtained by
compressive tests performed in dry or hydrated (wet) condition are shown,
and in Table III
the values of the considered mechanical parameters are reported.
Table III
Compressive mechanical properties of PUF scaffolds
E (MPa)
m∗ (MPa)
σ10% (MPa)
σmax (MPa)
ε∗ (%)
I (J/cm3)
Dry
0.05 ± 0.00
0.03 ± 0.01
0.005 ± 0.000
0.03 ± 0.01
10.92 ± 1.01
0.32 ± 0.05
Wet
0.02 ± 0.00
0.03 ± 0.00
0.001 ± 0.000
0.02 ± 0.00
11.62 ± 1.87
0.13 ± 0.01
PUF = polyurethane foam.
Compressive mechanical properties of PUF scaffoldsPUF = polyurethane foam.Comparing the curves of PUF related to the dry and wet condition, the water
uptake caused a decrease in the mechanical properties, with a significant
difference in the elastic modulus, σ10%, and σmax
values (p<0.01) (Tab.
III). This decrease of the PUF mechanical properties in hydrated
condition could be related to the plasticizing effect of water that causes a
high flexibility and a lower mechanical strength. In addition, the
significant difference in the PUF residual deformation (p<0.05) and
hysteresis area (p<0.01) confirmed the effect of water absorption. In
particular, the decrease in hysteresis area value indicated the elastic
mechanical behavior of the PUF in a hydrated condition, compared with the
viscoelastic behavior detected for PUF tested in a dry condition.
Biological Assessment
Viability of cells on PUF scaffolds, as well as for Ctrl, was statistically
increased (p<0.01), with an exponential trend, during the cell culture (Fig. 5A). No statistically
significant difference was found between viability of cells on PUF and Ctrl
(i.e., culture plastic) at 1-day and 3-day culture, indicating that L929 were
well adherent on PUF specimens. Just after 7 days, a statistical difference
between PUF and Ctrl was evidenced. DNA quantification (Fig. 5B) confirmed the results obtained in
the viability test, in that estimated cell numbers at each time point presented
the same trend and the same statistical difference (p<0.01). SEM
investigations (see Supplementary Figure 1, available online as supplementary material at www.jab-fm.com – SEM images of internal, external and
cross-section of PUF samples for direct cytotoxicity. Scale bars = 100 μm)
evidenced the morphological modification of L929 upon scaffolds. A progressive
cell spreading was visible, from a rounded shape after 1 day to a well-adhesive
and flattened conformation observed 7 days after seeding; cells adhered also in
PUF pores below the external surface.
Fig. 5
Quantitative analyses performed on polyurethane foam (PUF) scaffolds for
cell attachment and growth. Three time points are reported (1, 3 and 7
days); TCP was used as control (Ctrl). (A) Alamar Blue
assay (Ctrl day 1 only); (B) DNA quantification.
jabfm.5000334p≤0.0001.
Quantitative analyses performed on polyurethane foam (PUF) scaffolds for
cell attachment and growth. Three time points are reported (1, 3 and 7
days); TCP was used as control (Ctrl). (A) Alamar Blue
assay (Ctrl day 1 only); (B) DNA quantification.
jabfm.5000334p≤0.0001.
Dynamic Culture Configurations
Viability Assay and DNA Quantification
Values obtained from viability test and DNA quantification (Fig. 6) showed different
cell responses in the 3 configurations in the bioreactor. For the static
configuration, there was a stable metabolic activity for the 7-day and
14-day time points that was reduced in the last time point; DNA
quantification indicated an increase in cell number from 7 days to 14 days,
but this growth significantly slowed after 21 days of culture (p<0.05).
In contrast, in the single-phase configuration, viability presented a 7-day
to 14-day significant increase (p<0.01), while it became stable up to the
last time point. The estimated cell number was constant throughout the
culture. Focusing on the double-phase configuration, cells increased both in
viability and in number, with a statistically significant increase
(p<0.01) (Fig.
6).
Fig. 6
(A) Alamar Blue viability assay and (B) DNA
quantification performed on polyurethane foam (PUF) samples under
dynamic culture and static control conditions, for up to 21
days.
(A) Alamar Blue viability assay and (B) DNA
quantification performed on polyurethane foam (PUF) samples under
dynamic culture and static control conditions, for up to 21
days.
SEM Observations and Histological Analysis
In the static configuration (Fig. 7), cells completely covered the external surface with ECM
during culture time, and formed a continuous layer, closing the smallest
pores of the PUF scaffold. The internal surface was quite bare, and no cells
were detectable attached to the PUF pore wall surface. In the single-phase
exposure, ECM entirely covered the external surface, closing all pores
throughout the dynamic culture duration, but still the luminal side of the
scaffold was scarcely populated and minimal ECM formation was noticeable in
the smallest pores in the inner surface of the PUF scaffold. In the
double-phase configuration, the scaffold colonization improved in comparison
with the previous culture conditions. The external surface was uniformly
covered by a major ECM layer. Fibroblasts partially covered the luminal side
throughout the dynamic culture: cell number gradually increased reaching the
stage of ECM deposition, demonstrating a higher rate of cell proliferation
and migration throughout the scaffold thickness.
Fig. 7
SEM images at 21 days of culture of static, single-phase and
double-phase samples. Images were acquired on the external surface
and inner surface of different samples of the polyurethane foam
(PUF) scaffold (scale bar = 500 µm).
SEM images at 21 days of culture of static, single-phase and
double-phase samples. Images were acquired on the external surface
and inner surface of different samples of the polyurethane foam
(PUF) scaffold (scale bar = 500 µm).This evidence was supported by histological sections. Hematoxylin and eosin
staining (Fig. 8)
indicated that after 21 days of culture, the static configuration's outward
surface had a thick layer of rounded cells; while, in the single-phase
configuration, cells were elongated and organized into a compact tissue.
Similarly, in the double-phase configuration, the external side was covered
by many elongated cells, well organized in a dense and close matrix with
rounded fibroblasts, colonizing also the scaffold thickness. Internally, the
double-phase configuration seemed to present a thicker rounded-cell layer
than the single-phase, which was not present at all in the static
configuration. Moreover, the cross-section evidenced that no cells colonized
the scaffold thickness in the static condition; otherwise, in the
single-phase and in double-phase, cells penetrated the entire scaffold wall.
The outcome was further improved for the last dynamic culture condition,
where fibroblasts formed conglomerates within the thickness.
Fig. 8
Histological images with hematoxylin and eosin staining at 21 days of
culture of static, single-phase and double-phase samples. In = inner
surface, out = outer surface (scale bar = 2 mm).
Histological images with hematoxylin and eosin staining at 21 days of
culture of static, single-phase and double-phase samples. In = inner
surface, out = outer surface (scale bar = 2 mm).
Discussion
This study investigated a new polyol mixture for the production of PUFs as a scaffold
for hollow TE, and the effect of different dynamic culture conditions on cell
behavior and scaffold colonization. To this purpose, high porosity (about 90%) and
high interconnectivity (>65%) are required to provide an adequate exchange of
nutrient and waste products across the scaffold thickness and to promote rapid cell
ingrowth and scaffold colonization (16, 17).
Considering this, we were able to develop a 3D PUF porous scaffold with adequate
morphological structure (porosity of 89.13%, interconnectivity higher than 80%).
Preliminary biological assessment demonstrated the absence of toxic compounds
released in culture media by PUF at day 1. The viability was further improved
between days 3 and 7, while the DNA content depicted a similar growth trend for
cells cultured both on PUF and static tissue culture plates. SEM micrographs
indicated the presence of vital and proliferative cells, evidencing the ability of
PUF scaffolds to promote cell adhesion and growth. Moreover, since pore dimension
influences cells’ ECM production, pore size must be higher than 68 μm; in
particular, pore size in the range between 275 and 500 μm promotes tissue ingrowth
(16, 17, 30, 31). These values were comparable to PUF
average pore size (548 ± 120 μm). Our PUF morphological characterization
demonstrated the suitability of PUF as a possible substrate for TE tubular scaffolds
for hollow tissue regeneration, such as tracheas and esophagi. The mechanical
characterization of the matrices produced showed Young's modulus (about 0.05 MPa),
under uniaxial compression, to be comparable to soft tissues (32, 33). On the one hand, this parameter is one of
the most important to be considered in TE applications, since elastic modulus,
coupled with stresses and deformations, indicates the capability of the material to
resist to physiological loads. On the other hand, the mechanical characterization
gave us relevant information underlining the need for cell colonization and matrix
deposition to enhance the performances of the material before a possible transplant.
In this regard, a final direct comparison of the mechanical properties between PUF
scaffold and decellularized ECM would be interesting at the end of in vitro culture,
to evaluate the effect of the ECM produced and the polymeric structure.Further, the state-of-the-art analysis demonstrated that forced convective flow
throughout the scaffold wall enhances oxygen supply, nourishment and waste removal
with beneficial effects on cell proliferation, scaffold colonization and ECM
deposition (8, 13). In the present study, the
convective flow was introduced by the longitudinal rotation, comparing 2 different
dynamic conditions (single-phase and double-phase) with static controls. Our initial
consideration was based on the equation of mass transport, valid for the static
condition:where D is the diffusion coefficient of the considered substance through the medium,
c is the molar concentration of a substance, V is the molar rate of consumption per
unit volume. A similar situation was analyzed by Asnaghi et al (8).The introduction of longitudinal rotation added the further convective term to (Eq.
[4]), due
to the rotation speed, valid for both the single-phase and double-phase conditions
(Eq. [5]):where v is the velocity of “fluid” due to the rotational speed and the diffusivity
coefficient D varies depending on the phase (air or culture medium).The practical effectiveness of the longitudinal rotation in terms of biochemical and
mechanical conditioning to increase cellular metabolism and scaffold colonization
was demonstrated with DNA quantification and viability assay in dynamic cultures,
both under the single-phase rotation and the double-phase exposure. Their higher
viability and cell number in comparison with the static configuration was most
likely related to the introduction of the velocity term in Equation [5].
In contrast, the absence of the convective term in the static configuration causes a
lower nutrient supply, insufficient to guarantee good cell viability throughout the
thickness of the 3D matrix. These quantitative results were also confirmed by SEM
and histological analyses where single-phase and double-phase conditioning promoted
higher cell colonization throughout the scaffold thickness. The direct comparison
between single-phase and double-phase configurations indicated that the alternating
exposure to air and culture medium further enhances cell metabolism and
proliferation. This observation can be related to the higher value of diffusion in
Equation [5]:
in the single-phase, D was considered for oxygen within a fluid
(culture medium) through a minimum of 0.3 cm to a maximum of 1 cm of medium; this
parameter could justify the best cellular results obtained in the single-phase in
comparison with static configuration. On the other hand, in the double-phase,
D has 2 contributors, air and medium, due to the longitudinal
rotation and due to the level of culture medium which half cover the PUF scaffold.
This gives the advantage of a faster oxygen diffusion in the thin layer of media
covering the matrix when the scaffold is half-exposed to air (34). Thus, in the double-phase configuration,
the scaffold surface exposed to air was subjected to an enhanced oxygenation and
nourishment. On that side, cells were almost directly in contact with air, except
for a thin medium layer that allows a major exchange of gases thanks to the reduced
thickness of this layer (order of micrometers) in comparison with the medium barrier
present in the single-phase (order of centimeters). The media convection in the
scaffold improves the homogeneous distribution of the nutrients dissolved in the
culture media, increasing cellular activity. Taking benefits from the increased
exchange of oxygen, cell ingrowth and ECM production on the PUF pore wall surface
were increased, as evidenced by the results displayed. Similar outcomes were also
reached in a work by Anton et al, where the alternate contact of cells to air and
medium enhanced cellular nutrients and oxygen supply (35), but a single-phase comparison was not
reported.To better support our theory, computational simulations of the 3 culture conditions
should be implemented to evaluate the contribution of the double effect of
convection and the alternating exposure to air and medium. The final aim will be to
better understand the contribution of the different components of fluid shear and
gas phases to the cellular metabolism and activities during the culture in
bioreactors, both for the double-phase and single-phase conditions.Thus, among the investigated cellular culture conditions, double-phase alternating
rotation represents the optimal in vitro condition for cell proliferation,
metabolism and scaffold colonization.
Conclusion
In this study, we first established that PUF morphology was adequate to promote cell
adhesion and, combined with convective flow, cell movement from the external layer
toward the luminal surface, highlighting the great potential of this newly developed
foam. Secondly, we demonstrated the effectiveness of convective flow generated by
longitudinal rotation during cell culture, coupled with double-phase exposure, for
tubular 3D porous scaffolds. The alternating exposure to air and culture medium of
the seeded porous scaffolds improves viability, proliferation, scaffold thickness
colonization and ECM production, since the biochemical and mechanical conditioning
optimizes the oxygen supply and the exchange of nutrients and waste.In summary, alternated double-phase rotation provided the optimal biochemical and
mechanical stimuli able to promote the development of functional 3D TE constructs in
the rotating bioreactor developed.